Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Colorado
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 11-16-2016, 11:43 PM
 
4,857 posts, read 7,611,888 times
Reputation: 6394

Advertisements

Everytime another state passes a recreational use law there will be less demand from states like Colorado, as those new states can now grow their own.
Less demand means either lower prices or fewer growers. And it means there's that much less 'weed tourism'.
Either way there's some growing pains coming for states that went recreational early.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 11-17-2016, 06:09 AM
 
Location: Pueblo - Colorado's Second City
12,262 posts, read 24,464,513 times
Reputation: 4395
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dport7674 View Post
Everytime another state passes a recreational use law there will be less demand from states like Colorado, as those new states can now grow their own.
Less demand means either lower prices or fewer growers. And it means there's that much less 'weed tourism'.
Either way there's some growing pains coming for states that went recreational early.
Maybe not. Every state has wine but we still have a Napa Valley. So if Pueblo can sucrssfully set itself up as the Napa Valley for MJ then we will still see growth and why i have heard could reach 250,000 to 500,000 people by 2030.

Last edited by Josseppie; 11-17-2016 at 07:24 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-17-2016, 07:56 AM
 
Location: Pueblo - Colorado's Second City
12,262 posts, read 24,464,513 times
Reputation: 4395
As a side note from talking to people who have moved to Pueblo to work in the MJ/ Hemp industries most are urbanists and want to live in downtown Pueblo and make it a more urban enviorment. If this trend continues it will be interesting to see how the urban center grows and what it looks like in the next 4-14 years.

Pueblo might have hit the jackpot. Not only could it see significant growth but it could be dense growth not the surburban sprawl mess you have on the front range from Colorado Springs to Fort Collins.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-17-2016, 11:11 AM
 
4,857 posts, read 7,611,888 times
Reputation: 6394
Quote:
Originally Posted by Josseppie View Post
Maybe not. Every state has wine but we still have a Napa Valley. So if Pueblo can sucrssfully set itself up as the Napa Valley for MJ then we will still see growth and why i have heard could reach 250,000 to 500,000 people by 2030.
Good point
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-11-2016, 09:55 PM
 
Location: Pueblo - Colorado's Second City
12,262 posts, read 24,464,513 times
Reputation: 4395
Default Legalized Marijuana Could Drive A New Tech Boom

This is another example of why i like Pueblo being the MJ valley. It will be interesting to see how this side develops here in the next 5-10 years.


This is from Forbes:

All-in-all, legalizing marijuana has been a huge success in Colorado. Many states sat on the sidelines to see what impact it would have in Colorado, but now that they see how well it’s going lawmakers are introducing legislation to capitalize on the benefits in their own states.

Along with the various production and retail businesses that spring up when marijuana is legalized, there are also a variety of tech opportunities. As marijuana becomes a bigger industry across the entire country, it could drive a boom in marijuana-related tech.

The link: Forbes Welcome
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-20-2016, 11:00 PM
 
59 posts, read 54,749 times
Reputation: 136
Default Will pot projects go up in smoke?

Will pot projects go up in smoke? | The Pueblo Chieftain
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-20-2016, 11:50 PM
 
Location: Pueblo - Colorado's Second City
12,262 posts, read 24,464,513 times
Reputation: 4395
While i do not agree with the ruling it does not impsct excise taxes and the impact leagal MJ has had and will have on Pueblo. It will be intetesting to see how this aspect plays out.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-21-2016, 04:15 PM
 
Location: Colorado Springs
4,944 posts, read 2,941,945 times
Reputation: 3805
Quote:
Originally Posted by Josseppie View Post
As a side note from talking to people who have moved to Pueblo to work in the MJ/ Hemp industries most are urbanists and want to live in downtown Pueblo and make it a more urban enviorment. If this trend continues it will be interesting to see how the urban center grows and what it looks like in the next 4-14 years.

Pueblo might have hit the jackpot. Not only could it see significant growth but it could be dense growth not the surburban sprawl mess you have on the front range from Colorado Springs to Fort Collins.
Colorado Springs will have a better and more dense downtown core than Pueblo by 2020. CO springs is on the march lets hope Pueblo does not get left behind.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-21-2016, 07:44 PM
 
Location: Pueblo - Colorado's Second City
12,262 posts, read 24,464,513 times
Reputation: 4395
Quote:
Originally Posted by BornintheSprings View Post
Colorado Springs will have a better and more dense downtown core than Pueblo by 2020. CO springs is on the march lets hope Pueblo does not get left behind.
Pueblo has a lot of proposed peojects in downtown and many will start in 2017. Much more then in Colorado Springs.

I have been posting them in this thread:

//www.city-data.com/forum/color...o-tour-35.html
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-22-2016, 09:59 PM
 
59 posts, read 54,749 times
Reputation: 136
A review of the on line Pueblo Planning and Zoning Commission shows none of these projects are even in the pipeline for approval. A review of the on line Pueblo Regional Building Department shows no building permits have been issued for any of these projects.


I suspect that Pueblo will end up losing the Regional Tourism Act funds. The requirement for funding is that substantial work on the project must have started within five years of approval. That date is May of 2017.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Settings
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2000-2020 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Colorado
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:20 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top