Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Current Events
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
View Poll Results: Should Maj. Nidal be executed, or serve a life term with no chance of parole?
Execute him 29 72.50%
Life sentence with no parole 10 25.00%
Not sure 1 2.50%
Voters: 40. You may not vote on this poll

Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 04-03-2014, 12:46 PM
 
Location: Between West Chester and Chester, PA
2,802 posts, read 3,193,523 times
Reputation: 4900

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by BucFan View Post
Gun ban likely has prevented a lot of these incidents when people lose control, anger take over - and the consequence are what we saw yesterday. I totally disagree with your post.
Disagree all you want. Gun Free Zones are easy kill zones. Do you think a person with bad intentions is going to go where just about everybody or almost everybody is armed? Hell no!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 04-03-2014, 12:57 PM
 
5,705 posts, read 3,676,471 times
Reputation: 3907
Quote:
Originally Posted by Creature of the Wheel View Post
Disagree all you want. Gun Free Zones are easy kill zones. Do you think a person with bad intentions is going to go where just about everybody or almost everybody is armed? Hell no!
Sure. Is that why so many people die from guns on gun free planes and airports every year? Using your logic they should be some of the most dangerous places to be then and yet the opposite is true.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-03-2014, 12:59 PM
 
10,785 posts, read 5,699,785 times
Reputation: 10926
Quote:
Originally Posted by biggunsmallbrains View Post
Sure. Is that why so many people die from guns on gun free planes and airports every year? Using your logic they should be some of the most dangerous places to be then and yet the opposite is true.
Silly argument to make when there is active screening for weapons at airports.

A much better argument to make would be related to the safety of gun free school zones.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-03-2014, 01:11 PM
 
Location: Sugarmill Woods , FL
6,234 posts, read 8,454,597 times
Reputation: 13810
Quote:
Originally Posted by PrimusPilus View Post
Sad!
Not to sound naive, but why is there so much gun violence in America? We are probably the only western nation that doesn't introspect hard enough.
Yes why would the military need those guns they use?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-03-2014, 01:28 PM
 
7,280 posts, read 10,962,647 times
Reputation: 11491
Quote:
Originally Posted by Retroit View Post
Why is a person with mental illness allowed to continue to serve? Would it be acceptable for them to be sent into war with mental illness? (Presuming that all those in the military should be battle-ready.)

Why aren't soldiers able to carry firearms on base? If we don't trust them in a peacetime military base, how would we trust them in a conflict zone? Seem to me that soldiers should be required to carry arms at all times. If they are not mentally able, they should not be in the military.
If all soldiers carried firearms at all our military bases, we'd have so many accidental discharges, it comes down to probability, not lack of training or responsibility. There is a big difference between carrying a weapon in combat or combat zone and on a military base in the States. The functions and activities military personnel are engaged in while on a military base in the US are different than those carried out while deployed. It just wouldn't work very well.

It has nothing to do with trust, it has everything to do with the nature of the routine activities soldiers will engage in considering the two different environments.

The soldier with a mental illness remains in the military while undergoing treatment. The military can control if they are or are not deployed to a combat zone. Just because someone is afflicted with a mental illness doesn't mean they will always be so. The idea that they will always remain unsuitable means we also accept the mental illness is not treatable. If the soldier is found to be unfit for military service in any capacity and can't be treated to a degree that makes them fit, they can be discharged but at least provide them with the dignity, honor and treatment we demand everyone else gets. To do less is making the soldier a 2nd class citizen, that is unacceptable.

The rules of engagement are radically different between soldiers and the police. The mindset is different too. It just wouldn't work and in any case, highly doubtful it would have made a difference. The guy got his shots off pretty quick and the last thing you want is an entire base of soldiers walking round combat equipped on the edge waiting for something. Of course, that is the effect of the two shootings anyway but there is another answer.

There will always be the individual who can defeat any security measures, always.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-03-2014, 01:33 PM
 
Location: Between West Chester and Chester, PA
2,802 posts, read 3,193,523 times
Reputation: 4900
Quote:
Originally Posted by PrimusPilus View Post
Sad!
Not to sound naive, but why is there so much gun violence in America? We are probably the only western nation that doesn't introspect hard enough.
The problem isn't the guns. It's the people.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-03-2014, 01:35 PM
 
Location: Between West Chester and Chester, PA
2,802 posts, read 3,193,523 times
Reputation: 4900
Quote:
Originally Posted by biggunsmallbrains View Post
Sure. Is that why so many people die from guns on gun free planes and airports every year? Using your logic they should be some of the most dangerous places to be then and yet the opposite is true.
Your moniker says it all.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-03-2014, 01:43 PM
 
Location: Austin, TX
155 posts, read 211,663 times
Reputation: 113
Quote:
Originally Posted by edwardvanderbosch View Post
Yes why would the military need those guns they use?
If it were so simple, this would happen in every base in not just the US, but the whole world. But this seems to happen only in the US. So your head banger doesn't make sense, after all.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-03-2014, 01:44 PM
 
Location: Austin, TX
155 posts, read 211,663 times
Reputation: 113
Quote:
Originally Posted by Creature of the Wheel View Post
The problem isn't the guns. It's the people.
You mean to say people in the US are different compared to people elsewhere?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-03-2014, 02:05 PM
 
7,280 posts, read 10,962,647 times
Reputation: 11491
Quote:
Originally Posted by Creature of the Wheel View Post
The problem isn't the guns. It's the people.
Nope, that is the call of the NRA which only makes things worse. It isn't the people, there will always be people who do things contrary to law and so on. We can blame people all we want and say it is the bad apples. That works in some instances where you have shooters like those that walk into schools and so one and kill a bunch of people and who know exactly what they are doing. That also applies to the criminal elements that use guns.

The person who has a mental illness while not excusing the act of murder isn't the point of failure. Anyone can become ill because of a mental problem or even a physical one that affects them mentally. In those cases and this one too, the safeguards we have established aren't sufficient to deal with the problem.

If it turns out, the shooter had a mental problem it was the procedures and policies that weren't adequate to prevent the tragedy that allowed the events to happen. We have more traffic at our airports than any military base in the US yet the same procedures we use to at airports isn't available at our military bases and in case no one is looking, our military bases are as large a target as anything else.

The guy bought the gun legally, according to reports. In essence, because no one seems to be able to figure it out, someone under the care of mental health professionals and up for PTSD evaluation was able to buy a gun. Why is that so? Could he have obtained a gun otherwise? Perhaps but we'll never know will we?

This isn't about a 2nd amendment right as some might say, no one is talking about taking away the rights of anyone but this is about insuring the rights of everyone are guaranteed, including the 2nd amendment.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Current Events

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top