Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Current Events
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 04-19-2019, 03:14 PM
 
Location: Honolulu, HI
24,650 posts, read 9,477,090 times
Reputation: 22988

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Javacoffee View Post
Baggage gets weighed. Passengers should also get weighed. I'm 100 pounds soak-n-wet. Why shouldn't someone who weighs three or four times that not pay more for the ride?
I agree. Airplane seats are not getting any bigger, so go ahead and charge that 280 pounder over there and their massive luggge extra for using up more airplane fuel due to their weight.

This should provide an incentive for folks to either slim down, or stop packing so much luggage (including carry ons they can’t fit in the overhead bin)
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 04-19-2019, 03:29 PM
 
500 posts, read 319,422 times
Reputation: 1322
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rocko20 View Post
https://www.travelandleisure.com/air...ing-passengers

Interesting. I wonder if this would eventually be used to start charging heavier passengers an additional fee


High time to introduce this policy!

Why should I have to pay the same fare as those overweight slugs who cost the airlines more to operate?
The current system is monstrously unfair.

Fat shaming? You betcha! They need all the shaming we can heap upon them; something has to make them come to their senses.
.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-19-2019, 03:51 PM
 
Location: equator
11,054 posts, read 6,655,273 times
Reputation: 25581
Waiting for a commercial pilot to "weigh in" on this topic.

As the average person has gotten heavier and heavier, this has to have an effect on fuel consumption.

The "average weight" used for calculations MUST have increased---we would hope.

Or we are really flying by the seat of our pants.

I agree it would be fair to weigh passengers as we do luggage. It's science, not opinion.

You can bet your life they do it in smaller aircraft. A decade back, a 10-seater aircraft crashed on take-off in my former desert town. Overloaded.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-19-2019, 03:55 PM
 
Location: BFE
1,415 posts, read 1,190,347 times
Reputation: 4513
Quote:
Originally Posted by K12144 View Post
Smart move on the part of the airlines. Get people judging and bickering amongst each other (in this case, start a big fat-hate-fest), and they won't notice that you're introducing ridiculous policies to hose them. Divide and conquer, etc.
You nailed it. Just look at the posts in this thread.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-19-2019, 03:58 PM
 
Location: Avignon, France
11,163 posts, read 7,974,219 times
Reputation: 28973
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sand&Salt View Post
Waiting for a commercial pilot to "weigh in" on this topic.

As the average person has gotten heavier and heavier, this has to have an effect on fuel consumption.

The "average weight" used for calculations MUST have increased---we would hope.

Or we are really flying by the seat of our pants.

I agree it would be fair to weigh passengers as we do luggage. It's science, not opinion.

You can bet your life they do it in smaller aircraft. A decade back, a 10-seater aircraft crashed on take-off in my former desert town. Overloaded.
They already use a higher weight average per passenger. Trust me... they have it down to a science for weight, balance and fuel efficiency.
Folks trying to invent a better mouse trap.. funny.
Sounds like most of you have disdain for fat people and just want to punish them for taking up more space.

Last edited by Sydney123; 04-19-2019 at 04:24 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-19-2019, 04:00 PM
 
Location: BFE
1,415 posts, read 1,190,347 times
Reputation: 4513
Quote:
Originally Posted by BBBentley View Post
Why should I have to pay the same fare as those overweight slugs who cost the airlines more to operate?
The current system is monstrously unfair.
Here Here!

And why should I have to pay as much as those damn Handicapped people who insist on ramps and elevators and stuff that cost business a butt-load?



And what's with short people?

Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-19-2019, 04:01 PM
 
Location: Somewhere.
10,481 posts, read 25,296,262 times
Reputation: 9120
A simple way to weigh people without their knowledge: When you go to get your tickets, you step onto a rubberized area that weighs you. The ticket person see's the weight, but you don't. Could this work? They could also find a way to weigh you while going through the scanners.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-19-2019, 04:02 PM
 
Location: NJ
1,860 posts, read 1,249,046 times
Reputation: 6027
So how does this making heavier people pay extra thing work? Over 150? Over 200? Over their recommended weight for their height? Over average? Someone who weighs 100 lbs soaking wet is probably 5'0 or close to it. My husband is over a foot taller than that and weighs almost double. But hes not overweight. So he has to pay double your fare simply because he exists? What do you intend to shame out of him?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-19-2019, 04:29 PM
 
6,806 posts, read 4,479,600 times
Reputation: 31230
Quote:
Originally Posted by LO28SWM View Post
So how does this making heavier people pay extra thing work? Over 150? Over 200? Over their recommended weight for their height? Over average? Someone who weighs 100 lbs soaking wet is probably 5'0 or close to it. My husband is over a foot taller than that and weighs almost double. But hes not overweight. So he has to pay double your fare simply because he exists? What do you intend to shame out of him?
It's not about fat, it's about weight. If he weighs more than the average guy, yes, he should pay more. X-large people pay more for X-large clothes because it takes more material to make the clothing. Why should an airplane ride be any different? I'm not shaming anyone. It costs more to fly heavy people, so pay your fair share.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-19-2019, 04:34 PM
 
4,717 posts, read 3,272,243 times
Reputation: 12122
Quote:
Originally Posted by BereniceUK View Post
A few years ago, before a Powell River to Vancouver flight, I had to sit on the baggage scales. Not because I was at all overweight, but, if I remember right, because of the heavy weight of my suitcase, they needed to check my weight too.
The only time in my life I took a chartered flight, it was for the downtown airport in Kansas City to a business meeting in Des Moines. They actually called a couple of days before and asked what I weighed! Cool flight- I had a picture taken of myself in front of the plane and posted it on FB.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Current Events

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:53 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top