Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Economics
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 03-20-2016, 02:34 PM
 
Location: Orange County, CA
4,903 posts, read 3,363,830 times
Reputation: 2977

Advertisements

Lol, yeah not really surprised...

Yellen basically pulled a "Bank of Japan"; says one thing but does different when the time came...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 03-20-2016, 03:12 PM
 
577 posts, read 1,001,438 times
Reputation: 629
Quote:
Originally Posted by mathjak107 View Post
so they should raise rates with things regressing ?

i got to hand to you amateur economist wannabees , you guys are nuts .
I'm hardly a chicken little, and I will continue to take a long term view on my investments. If anything I invest more during the dips, even if I believe they will be larger dips because you really can't time the market.

But I still hold the opinion that the fed missed the boat on raising rates a couple years ago. They've hit their unemployment targets, and consumer inflation is within targets but they are still paralyzed to act. If they are now unable to raise rates because of global instability then in my opinion they missed the window to start raising them gradually as the economy improved.

And my larger fear is that because of the narrow focus on consumer inflation, they continue to miss other sources of inflation, mainly inflation in asset prices. In addition to measuring the prices of goods and services which the CPI captures, they should also be watching the growth in assets. While the CPI is measuring current inflation, the growth in asset prices marks future consumption. The CPI has started to rise recently, I believe this is a result of the wealth effect from rising asset prices starting to show in the current CPI.

But then again I'm just a Monday morning economist so you can disregard all that.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-20-2016, 03:17 PM
 
106,724 posts, read 108,937,910 times
Reputation: 80213
Actually we are below the feds inflation target .when you think about the fact that markets are almost where they were 16 years ago on an inflation adjusted basis there isn't much asset inflation in my opinion. Maybe we averaged 1.70% a year inflation adjusted.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-20-2016, 04:52 PM
 
Location: ATX-HOU
10,216 posts, read 8,123,991 times
Reputation: 2037
Quote:
Originally Posted by andywire View Post
I'm not sure who these people, but it is certainly their right to whine and complain.
It works both ways. Folks can complain about the complainers.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-20-2016, 06:51 PM
 
Location: Spain
12,722 posts, read 7,582,293 times
Reputation: 22639
Quote:
Originally Posted by dv1033 View Post
It works both ways. Folks can complain about the complainers.
Meta-complainers (tm)
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-22-2016, 10:13 PM
 
Location: NYC
20,550 posts, read 17,718,910 times
Reputation: 25616
Quote:
Originally Posted by FrankMiller View Post
If the Fed raises rates and drives the economy into the ground, how would all those newly-unemployed people earn money to save?
That because our current economy is fraudulently setup and rigged. When you have businesses that game on using cheap money to generate even more cheap money. That's not a healthy economy. They're holding jobs as hostage. Because workers pay taxes, these corporations don't. The game is so rigged.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-30-2016, 03:05 PM
 
31,927 posts, read 27,007,597 times
Reputation: 24824
Would have to research it further but IIRC historically Federal Reserve chairmen have not been big on interest rate hikes during POTUS election years. Certainly not when their personal party choice matches that of incumbent administration. Sort of like the unwritten rule/custom of SC justices not retiring while an opposition president is in office.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Economics

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:27 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top