Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Well I think that about sums it up. My question is why is he even in the race with no chance of winning. I believe his staffers figured out that he was never really serious about winning and was just doing it for publicity, because if he is as smart as some think, he would know he has no chance because he is aware that most will think of him as a scumbag.
He is one of the decoys the GOP throw out every time to manipulate the primaries. He is a pawn and he knows it.
Can you prove that statement? How do you know he was 'cheating', and what are you calling cheating?
I lived through all of this and have been involved in politics...well, almost my whole life I guess. I remember all of this quite clearly and there is public record of it. Gingrich admitted most of it because it was going to all come out at the time. It was really ugly for both parties back then.
Okay, you have proved your point. I accept that mea culpa and I forgive him his trespasses. I hope he goes on to make millions for speeches, just like Clinton the rapist exhibitionist.
I hope you hold the women just as guilty as Newt. Afterall, they had an affair with a married man. Water under the bridge.
I dont believe Newt has ran for elected office since leaving the House.
I didn't say he had. You misunderstood what I said. Decoys they throw out such as Guilianni, Thompson...they used Huckabee in the end last time to manipulate things. They always do that.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.