Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
You have without reading carefully, accepted on blind faith what both Frank Gaffney & the author at The Daily Caller told you he was saying without reading for yourself to see if their interpretations were true or false.
Your source "scholars", Mr. Gaffney & the author at The Daily Caller have embarrassed themselves in their writings & interpretations of Mr. Khan's studies. Apparently they only made cursory research & were unable to understand the jist of his academic/scholarly writings.
It's most unfortunate that they were unable to tell the difference between pure advocacy of Sharia law on one hand versus the study & discussion of the origins of Sharia law on the other hand. There's a huge difference.
To be blunt, Frank Gaffney is a notorious Islamophobe. Basically Pamela Geller with a fancy pedigree.
The reason Khan was there in the first place was as a counter point to Trumps calling for the end of Muslim immigration to the USA and his vilifying those Muslims already here in the USA.
Khan allowed the Clinton campaign to exploit his family's personal tragedy as a weapon against her political adversary. Although he seems to have a few issues of his own.
Well, it's in the context of Trump being exclusionary and divisive. You can quibble all you want.
sigh..
It doesn't have to be one or the other. I am going with Gary Johnson.
yeah I will say it again, you can call Trump whatever you want to call him, I don't care. but Hillary Clinton is no way a healer, believing that is ALSO a joke.
You can quibble all you want. Quite frankly, I don't know what your problem is.
Khan allowed the Clinton campaign to exploit his family's personal tragedy as a weapon against her political adversary. Although he seems to have a few issues of his own.
You obviously did not read what I wrote here around 4:30 about the material found at your 2 links which were presented here earlier by someone else.
Go take a careful look please.
And as per the thread topic, could not someone of a viewpoint opposite to yours say the very same thing about Patricia Smith that you just said about Khizr Khan?
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Conservatives..
