Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 08-06-2016, 11:38 AM
 
12,265 posts, read 6,472,102 times
Reputation: 9435

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mack Knife View Post
Well, we have an ass and a liar running for President. Seems you like the liar. Fair enough.

The thing about an ass is that most often it is a means to an end. A liar though, it's part of them and they'll lie about anything and everything without reason, they just lie, it really is who they are.
Some of them have been known to lie their way to deadly and expensive wars.
Study: Bush, aides made 935 false statements in run-up to war - CNN.com

 
Old 08-06-2016, 11:42 AM
 
46,951 posts, read 25,990,037 times
Reputation: 29442
Quote:
Originally Posted by pghquest View Post
And now you know why the Democrats wants more illegals to enter the country.

Who cares how much the nation is destroyed in the process, Democrats need to win at all cost..
So in the Republican mind, "Hispanic" has to mean"illegal"? How's that outreach going?
 
Old 08-06-2016, 11:45 AM
 
4,120 posts, read 6,609,150 times
Reputation: 2290
Think there are 4 threads on the first two pages about Clinton being a criminal or about indicting her.
 
Old 08-06-2016, 12:25 PM
 
46,951 posts, read 25,990,037 times
Reputation: 29442
Quote:
Originally Posted by NCN View Post
I am wondering how anyone can do a poll that reflects the outcome. Popular vote maybe but sometimes the person winning the popular vote loses the election??
That's why sites like 538 and RCP aggregate state and national polls, feed them into models that take the electoral college into account, and publish results that covers both popular and electoral votes. It's just that Trump's followers hate them, because it's looking - bad.
 
Old 08-06-2016, 02:24 PM
 
Location: North America
14,204 posts, read 12,281,720 times
Reputation: 5565
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dane_in_LA View Post
That's why sites like 538 and RCP aggregate state and national polls, feed them into models that take the electoral college into account, and publish results that covers both popular and electoral votes. It's just that Trump's followers hate them, because it's looking - bad.
Yes, the worst thing that can be done is when non experts try to skew the polls. Hell, even experts sometimes try to do that as well. Remember Dick Morris in 2012? Sometimes you can see obvious bias in the polling data of course. The Survey USA polls in NC are a good example of this. They aren't using the voter file to weight their results and assuming the electorate will be less black and more older whites. Overall the polls give a pretty good picture of things. My guess is that after the bound the polls will settle back to +3-4 for Clinton. Basically back where we were before the election.
 
Old 08-06-2016, 02:44 PM
 
Location: Home is Where You Park It
23,856 posts, read 13,749,968 times
Reputation: 15482
Quote:
Originally Posted by NCN View Post
I am wondering how anyone can do a poll that reflects the outcome. Popular vote maybe but sometimes the person winning the popular vote loses the election??
That's what makes the fivethirtyeight site so compelling. Silver currently has the best track record of translating the polling data on the popular vote into the Electoral College vote.

Losing the popular vote but winning the electoral vote has happened 3 times, including Bush v. Gore.

"In fact, it is possible for a candidate to not get a single person's vote -- not one -- in 39 states or the District of Columbia, yet be elected president by wining the popular vote in just 11 of these 12 states:

California
New York
Texas
Florida
Pennsylvania
Illinois
Ohio
Michigan
New Jersey
North Carolina
Georgia
Virginia"

Electoral College System: How to Lose, but Win an Election

Take a look at that list to see why Trump has an uphill battle.
 
Old 08-06-2016, 03:28 PM
 
Location: North America
14,204 posts, read 12,281,720 times
Reputation: 5565
Quote:
Originally Posted by jacqueg View Post
That's what makes the fivethirtyeight site so compelling. Silver currently has the best track record of translating the polling data on the popular vote into the Electoral College vote.

Losing the popular vote but winning the electoral vote has happened 3 times, including Bush v. Gore.

"In fact, it is possible for a candidate to not get a single person's vote -- not one -- in 39 states or the District of Columbia, yet be elected president by wining the popular vote in just 11 of these 12 states:

California
New York
Texas
Florida
Pennsylvania
Illinois
Ohio
Michigan
New Jersey
North Carolina
Georgia
Virginia"

Electoral College System: How to Lose, but Win an Election

Take a look at that list to see why Trump has an uphill battle.
Including one time where the loser lost both the popular vote and the electoral college .
 
Old 08-06-2016, 04:05 PM
 
Location: Long Island
1,147 posts, read 1,899,102 times
Reputation: 438
That's why we use FQDN's and DNS, not IP's to browse the internet.
 
Old 08-06-2016, 04:34 PM
 
11,181 posts, read 10,532,733 times
Reputation: 18618
Quote:
Originally Posted by mightleavenyc View Post
They survey 3,000 people. That's why I tend to look at that poll rather than a Reuters poll that surveys like 600 people and sees wild swings all the time.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dane_in_LA View Post
As far as I can tell, only 400 people per poll. That's questionable methodology.
Yes, each poll represents 400 people taken from a fixed group of 3000 likely voters who were selected on 7/4. The poll attempts to track those same 3000 people over time in order to determine how/if their opinions shift.
They describe it as a " a pioneering approach to tracking changes in Americans' opinions throughout a campaign for the White House."
How the USC Dornsife/L.A. Times Daybreak tracking poll works - LA Times
The USC Dornsife / LA Times Presidential Election "Daybreak" Poll | Understanding America Study
 
Old 08-06-2016, 09:20 PM
 
1,683 posts, read 811,803 times
Reputation: 1613
The FOX NEWS poll that came out a few days ago had Clinton ahead by 10.

Is FOX NEWS conservative enough for the conservatives out there??
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Closed Thread


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top