Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 08-14-2016, 02:56 PM
 
1,020 posts, read 1,377,395 times
Reputation: 580

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by katzpaw View Post
Totally bogus. According to their website, 13 people completed 50,000 interviews in 2 weeks, That's 274 per day per interviewer and doesn't include incompletes or no answers (you'd need ~300-500,000 calls or more to get 50,000 completes). Also 1,000 per state gives more weight to smaller states. Of course there are are no breakdowns or details.
Yeah, I think I will stick with 538 for my poll-watching. I like their track record.

 
Old 08-14-2016, 03:01 PM
 
4,078 posts, read 2,338,899 times
Reputation: 1395
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ponderosa View Post
Voters under 35 in USA Today/Rock the Vote poll:

Clinton 56%
Trump 20%

Trump is not only losing this election for today, he is driving away an entire generation of voters who see him and his party as out of touch racists.



Young voters flee Donald Trump in what may be historic trouncing, poll shows
Young people vote in terribly low numbers, so that doesn't amount to much of anything
 
Old 08-14-2016, 03:12 PM
 
Location: Type 0.73 Kardashev
11,110 posts, read 9,810,680 times
Reputation: 40166
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ponderosa View Post
Voters under 35 in USA Today/Rock the Vote poll:

Clinton 56%
Trump 20%

Trump is not only losing this election for today, he is driving away an entire generation of voters who see him and his party as out of touch racists.

Young voters flee Donald Trump in what may be historic trouncing, poll shows
Quote:
Originally Posted by dexter75 View Post
Young people vote in terribly low numbers, so that doesn't amount to much of anything
In 2012, voters under the age of 30 were 19% of the electorate, while those 30-39 were 17%. If we guess that 9% of that 17% were 35-39, that means that 8% were 30-34 (ie, Ponderosa's 'under 35). 19% + 8% = 27% of the electorate.

What planet do you live on where getting killed 56%-20% with more than a quarter of the electorate, to quote you, 'doesn't amount to much of anything'?

PS - I see you utterly missed Ponderosa's point about the damage Trump is doing to the GOP in future elections by driving younger voters disproportionately to the Democratic Party.
 
Old 08-14-2016, 03:19 PM
 
Location: Mount Dora, FL
3,079 posts, read 3,121,138 times
Reputation: 1577
Quote:
Originally Posted by nononsenseguy View Post
A few weeks ago, Pat Cadell slammed the Reuters poll which showed Clinton with a 10 point lead after just the previous week showing Trump with a 10 point lead. That simply isn't possible, and Cadell knew it. He also used the occasion to slam other polls that had changed there methodology in order to favor Clinton.

Now we have a real poll, done fairly, of 50,000 people. It shows Trump leading Hillary, 67% to 19% nationwide.

Trump Leading 67% to Hillary
Putting faith in this poll, eh? Conservatives truly are in denial beyond any comprehension.
 
Old 08-14-2016, 03:38 PM
 
19,125 posts, read 25,323,648 times
Reputation: 25434
Quote:
Originally Posted by kingtodd View Post
Putting faith in this poll, eh? Conservatives truly are in denial beyond any comprehension.
Similar to those commercials for Jet.com, I predict that on the morning after election day, the heads of many of these delusional right-wingers will be spouting plumes of smoke. Whether the smoke will be purple--as in those commercials--is something else entirely, but when someone convinces himself/herself that something constitutes reality--despite all credible evidence--it can be very difficult to accept reality when it does finally arrive.

 
Old 08-14-2016, 04:30 PM
 
Location: NE Ohio
30,419 posts, read 20,304,341 times
Reputation: 8958
Quote:
Originally Posted by MTQ3000 View Post
Lol, when was the last presidential election in which anyone got 67% of the vote?

Yeah, exactly. No one has gotten even 61% in the last 100 years.

Mick

P.S. Love the moronic comments to that linked article.
This isn't an ordinary election. Reagan might have been close to this. His landslide was historic.
 
Old 08-14-2016, 04:33 PM
 
Location: NE Ohio
30,419 posts, read 20,304,341 times
Reputation: 8958
Quote:
Originally Posted by Spacecadet7 View Post
No actual like to the poll data? Because if it is on the Internet and you agree with it, then it must be true. Without any link to the data, I question if this is even a real poll, it seems more like a fake post on a random blog that some people are being suckered to believe it is true.
Seems like you didn't read the explanation of how the poll was done that was included with this. Not surprised. Many people don't like to read. They just make their assumptions and go with that.
 
Old 08-14-2016, 04:36 PM
 
Location: NE Ohio
30,419 posts, read 20,304,341 times
Reputation: 8958
Quote:
Originally Posted by jaguars010 View Post
he posts and then never returns
Gee, am I supposed to sit here for 24 hours waiting for the liberals to respond? I returned. It's only been a few hours. Get a life.

You are probably the same one who accused me of that on another thread.

Last edited by CaseyB; 08-14-2016 at 05:08 PM..
 
Old 08-14-2016, 04:36 PM
 
Location: Chicago, IL
1,988 posts, read 2,223,091 times
Reputation: 1536
Quote:
Originally Posted by nononsenseguy View Post
A few weeks ago, Pat Cadell slammed the Reuters poll which showed Clinton with a 10 point lead after just the previous week showing Trump with a 10 point lead. That simply isn't possible, and Cadell knew it. He also used the occasion to slam other polls that had changed there methodology in order to favor Clinton.

Now we have a real poll, done fairly, of 50,000 people. It shows Trump leading Hillary, 67% to 19% nationwide.

Trump Leading 67% to Hillary
I don't know whether to laugh at you or feel sorry for you.
 
Old 08-14-2016, 04:37 PM
 
Location: Caverns measureless to man...
7,588 posts, read 6,626,379 times
Reputation: 17966
Quote:
Originally Posted by nononsenseguy View Post
Seems like you didn't read the explanation of how the poll was done that was included with this. Not surprised. Many people don't like to read. They just make their assumptions and go with that.
Yes, that's exactly the point many of us are making. We did read the explanation of how the poll was supposedly done, and some of us have pointed out that it was clearly a lie - because some of the things they claim about their methodology are completely impossible.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Closed Thread


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top