Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 12-15-2018, 08:26 PM
 
14,488 posts, read 6,139,373 times
Reputation: 6846

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bureaucat View Post
Anyone nominated.

He’s that damned bad.

It will come down to a half-dozen states. Trump will lose the national popular vote to any Democrat nominated. In order to win he probably needs a third party candidate to pull of 5 to 10% because he’ll never win a majority. Expect a near record or better turnout because Trump generates turnout, although more is negative to him than positive.

It could go either way, but with a great chance of a record turnout, I like the chances that #45 will be a one-termer.



And when Trumpnhimsef is on the ballot he can increase turnout for himself. Just like Obama did
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 12-15-2018, 08:28 PM
 
14,488 posts, read 6,139,373 times
Reputation: 6846
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bureaucat View Post
Anyone nominated.

He’s that damned bad.

It will come down to a half-dozen states. Trump will lose the national popular vote to any Democrat nominated. In order to win he probably needs a third party candidate to pull of 5 to 10% because he’ll never win a majority. Expect a near record or better turnout because Trump generates turnout, although more is negative to him than positive.

It could go either way, but with a great chance of a record turnout, I like the chances that #45 will be a one-termer.



Anyone nominated? Great news. No excuse for libs to not make Warren their nominee or even Hillary again. Why are they even talking about who it should be then ?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-15-2018, 09:13 PM
 
11,985 posts, read 5,337,013 times
Reputation: 7284
Quote:
Originally Posted by dashrendar4454 View Post
Anyone nominated? Great news. No excuse for libs to not make Warren their nominee or even Hillary again. Why are they even talking about who it should be then ?
What I’m saying that anyone nominated will be competitive against Trump. Whether they win will depend on how about 6 to 9 competitive states fall. I don’t think that Trump can prevent whomever is nominated from getting at least 48% of the national popular vote. The Dem floor is about 48% of the vote nationally and around 213 electoral votes. The Pub floor is about 46% nationally and about 195 EV or so.

There hasn’t been a non-competitive Democratic nominee since Mike Dukakis in 1988.

Also, this was in response to WK ‘s query as to “who could take voters from Trump”. The voters in question were suburban Independents who voted in larger numbers for Trump in 2016 than expected, but who deserted the GOP in congressional races in 2018 to provide a check on Trump’s power.

2020 could go either way, but the higher the turnout, I think the better the chances that Trump is a one-termed, and if there is a massive turnout and Trump is re-elected, then so be it.

Last edited by Bureaucat; 12-15-2018 at 09:29 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-15-2018, 09:50 PM
 
Location: WI/MN resident
512 posts, read 480,957 times
Reputation: 1389
I might sound like a Liberal skeptic, but Trump will likely win if the economy is doing well by November 2020. As Bill Clinton said, "It's the economy, stupid!"

If Trump wins in 2020, there will be a blue tsunami in 2022, with Dems making big gains in both the House and the Senate, as we'll be in another recession by then.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-15-2018, 09:59 PM
 
Location: Los Angeles, CA
3,221 posts, read 1,752,266 times
Reputation: 2197
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bureaucat View Post
Anyone nominated.

He’s that damned bad.

It will come down to a half-dozen states. Trump will lose the national popular vote to any Democrat nominated. In order to win he probably needs a third party candidate to pull of 5 to 10% because he’ll never win a majority. Expect a near record or better turnout because Trump generates turnout, although more is negative to him than positive.

It could go either way, but with a great chance of a record turnout, I like the chances that #45 will be a one-termer.
People forget that last election was decided by less than 100,000 votes across three states. In his favor,Trump will have the advantage of being the incumbent, and having no challengers in a Republican primary. However, that has to be weighed against the fact that the next Democrat candidate will not have the same baggage as Hillary Clinton, and liberals continue to be motivated due to Trump's deep unpopularity. Further, as prior posters have noted, Trump has made no effort to broaden his base. I agree that it's highly unlikely Trump will win the popular vote. As long as Democrats don't nominate 1) Hillary; 2) Warren; or 3) any candidate with low energy charisma, then I'm optimistic about their chances of victory in 2020.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-15-2018, 10:10 PM
 
32,321 posts, read 15,272,293 times
Reputation: 13864
Quote:
Originally Posted by InnovativeAmerican View Post
I might sound like a Liberal skeptic, but Trump will likely win if the economy is doing well by November 2020. As Bill Clinton said, "It's the economy, stupid!"

If Trump wins in 2020, there will be a blue tsunami in 2022, with Dems making big gains in both the House and the Senate, as we'll be in another recession by then.
The middle class is still hurting under Trump
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-15-2018, 10:29 PM
 
Location: WI/MN resident
512 posts, read 480,957 times
Reputation: 1389
Quote:
Originally Posted by natalie469 View Post
The middle class is still hurting under Trump
I completely agree!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-16-2018, 03:50 AM
 
Location: Pennsylvania
31,335 posts, read 14,444,411 times
Reputation: 27877
Quote:
Originally Posted by xboxmas View Post
Since when have state elections mattered? There are Republican governors in Massachusetts and Vermont. Does that mean they are red? Illinois also recently had a Republican governor.

Indiana also had a D Senator for years, that didn't change anything.
Normally I might agree with you. But in these 2018 mid terms the state elections do matter. People were voting for or against - based on their opinion of Trump. Take it from a Trump voter - the results in these key swing states don't look good for Trump's re-election chances.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-16-2018, 04:05 AM
 
Location: Pennsylvania
31,335 posts, read 14,444,411 times
Reputation: 27877
Quote:
Originally Posted by Valhallian View Post
People forget that last election was decided by less than 100,000 votes across three states. In his favor,Trump will have the advantage of being the incumbent, and having no challengers in a Republican primary. However, that has to be weighed against the fact that the next Democrat candidate will not have the same baggage as Hillary Clinton, and liberals continue to be motivated due to Trump's deep unpopularity. Further, as prior posters have noted, Trump has made no effort to broaden his base. I agree that it's highly unlikely Trump will win the popular vote. As long as Democrats don't nominate 1) Hillary; 2) Warren; or 3) any candidate with low energy charisma, then I'm optimistic about their chances of victory in 2020.
Hillary is the one wild card that could bail out Trump no matter what else happens in the next two years, and I pray to the Lord above that the democrats nominate the corrupt biatch one more time.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-16-2018, 06:42 AM
 
13,875 posts, read 9,814,484 times
Reputation: 6870
A Beto/Harris ticket would destroy trump.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:07 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top