Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S.
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 07-27-2012, 11:59 PM
 
Location: Albuquerque, NM
37 posts, read 88,054 times
Reputation: 33

Advertisements

Did Washington state overtake Massachusetts in population during the 2010 census? Yes
Did Washington state overtake Massachusetts in importance during the 2010 census? No, due to the fact that MA has Boston and Seattle, WA is not quite on Boston's level.
Value this when talking about Dallas Metro overtaking Chicago Metro in population, which has a small chance of happening this century.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 07-28-2012, 01:08 AM
 
Location: Austin
1,795 posts, read 3,167,323 times
Reputation: 1255
Quote:
Originally Posted by armorgan86nm View Post
Did Washington state overtake Massachusetts in population during the 2010 census? Yes
Did Washington state overtake Massachusetts in importance during the 2010 census? No, due to the fact that MA has Boston and Seattle, WA is not quite on Boston's level.
Value this when talking about Dallas Metro overtaking Chicago Metro in population, which has a small chance of happening this century.
Not necessary, we still have 88 yrs to go, so anything is plausible. The Chicago metropolitan area only has 3 million more then DFW so it's not that big of a gap.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-28-2012, 02:06 AM
 
11,289 posts, read 26,199,461 times
Reputation: 11355
Quote:
Originally Posted by JoninATX View Post
Not necessary, we still have 88 yrs to go, so anything is plausible. The Chicago metropolitan area only has 3 million more then DFW so it's not that big of a gap.
Isn't that almost 50%?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-28-2012, 09:15 AM
 
Location: Austin
1,795 posts, read 3,167,323 times
Reputation: 1255
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chicago60614 View Post
Isn't that almost 50%?
Chicago has 9.8 million while DFW has 6.8 million. Half of 9.8 million would be 4.9 million.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-28-2012, 09:56 AM
 
Location: Austin, TX
12,059 posts, read 13,888,792 times
Reputation: 7257
Quote:
Originally Posted by armorgan86nm View Post
Did Washington state overtake Massachusetts in population during the 2010 census? Yes
Did Washington state overtake Massachusetts in importance during the 2010 census? No, due to the fact that MA has Boston and Seattle, WA is not quite on Boston's level.
Value this when talking about Dallas Metro overtaking Chicago Metro in population, which has a small chance of happening this century.
But WA state will continue to get more prominence and MA will continue to decline in importance.

Think of it this way. Back in 1950 MA had way more prominence than FL. Now FL has way more, along with way more population. Population is the first thing to be overtaken, then importance.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-28-2012, 09:58 AM
 
Location: Weymouth, The South
785 posts, read 1,882,361 times
Reputation: 475
Quote:
Originally Posted by JoninATX View Post
Chicago has 9.8 million while DFW has 6.8 million. Half of 9.8 million would be 4.9 million.
Nearly 50% of DFW.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-28-2012, 01:46 PM
 
Location: Austin
1,795 posts, read 3,167,323 times
Reputation: 1255
Quote:
Originally Posted by BruceTenmile View Post
Nearly 50% of DFW.
About 35%.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-29-2012, 09:06 PM
 
11,289 posts, read 26,199,461 times
Reputation: 11355
Quote:
Originally Posted by JoninATX View Post
Chicago has 9.8 million while DFW has 6.8 million. Half of 9.8 million would be 4.9 million.


Chicago metro is around 50% larger than Dallas metro.

Dallas = 6.8 million

50% = 3.4 million

Dallas grown by 50% = 10.2 million

Chicago metro = 9.8 million

Give or take, that was the point. It's closer to 45%, but I said 50% for simplicity.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-30-2012, 02:28 AM
 
148 posts, read 238,892 times
Reputation: 159
Default impact?

impact on chicago going from #3 to #4 in terms of population total? none. i believe this has been covered before. malignant population numbers create an impact? on what? were the #2 financial buisness center outside NYC in the us and somehow population total affects this? chicago is the nations commodities exchange command center. also the nations airline and rail transportation hub. chi also ranks 4th GDP worldwide, and is an alpha+ rated city. LA places higher with #3 gdp worldwide, has a higher population, but still rated as an alpha city same as dc and san fran. houston currently holds a beta+ rating, not bad, but it still has a ways to go even if poulation total city proper to city proper is more. to underscore again population numbers has 0 nothing nada to do with a cities importance. my family comes from metro manila a city of 20 million yet its only rated the same as houston at beta+... more likely its what the people are doing in that city with their jobs that affect or help other people elsewhere that determine a cities importance.

one may say ah to hell with global rankings theyre just as meaningless as population totals.... ha think again... the rankings are based on criteria such as economic, cultural, political, infrastructural aspects. this is from wikipedia - "A global city (also called world city or sometimes alpha city or world center) is a city generally considered to be an important node in the global economic system. The concept comes from geography and urban studies and rests on the idea that globalization can be understood as largely created, facilitated, and enacted in strategic geographic locales according to a hierarchy of importance to the operation of the global system of finance and trade."

so again how does a higher population total create a city of greater significance?
if somehow houston population went to #1 ahead of nyc would that make it the usa flagship city? nope!
if houston went to #2 spot ahead of LA would that make h-town better than LA? not really.
im not trashin on houston, im sure its a great place. its just that population numbers are just that. numbers and nothing more.

livin here in chi 30 somethin years, ive yet to see some "impact" psychologically or any, from la goin to #2 spot. people here would view this thread as insignificant. but theyd sure be glad if you like deep dish pizza and rooted for the cubs lol.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S.

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top