Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S.
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 12-31-2012, 08:46 AM
 
14,021 posts, read 15,022,389 times
Reputation: 10466

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bslette View Post
All right, I'll go back to the original point of the thread.

Some large cities that in my opinion don't have a landmark. I'm not going by biggest cities either, I'm just naming some cities.

Indianapolis - It doesn't really have a big one, yet the motor speedway is still a landmark.
Portland, OR
San Diego
Milwaukee
Columbus
Jacksonville
Kansas City
Tampa
Pittsburgh
Nashville
Denver
Etc.
For Pittsburgh I think the tower with the raised corners (P&g?) is very recongnizable.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 12-31-2012, 08:50 AM
 
Location: northern Vermont - previously NM, WA, & MA
10,749 posts, read 23,822,981 times
Reputation: 14665
Quote:
Originally Posted by BTA88 View Post
The For Boston, what about the Paul Revere statue in Boston Common? The park itself, most people wouldn't recognize, but the statue is used for lots of TV shows, sporting events and movies as a location shot.
That's not Paul Revere in the Public Gardens/Boston Common. That's actually George Washington on that horse. There is however a statue of Paul Revere in the Paul Revere mall behind the Old North Church in the North End. I think the Old North Church is an iconic Boston landmark, though not so sure most people outside the region could identify it.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Public_Garden_(Boston)

Quote:
Originally Posted by BTA88 View Post
It's criminal for Boston to have a building that looks like that at all, let alone for it to be city hall. That thing looks like it belongs somewhere in the northern mountain states, maybe Alaska. Very ugly, they should be ashamed.
It is criminal indeed, Boston City Hall is hideous. Even the mayor hates it and has lobbied to build a new one in another part of the city, though that's a financial boondoggle that the city isn't in favor of at oresent time. Though why put down the Northern mountains states or Alaska? Doubtful that Anchorage or Boise would have a city hall that ugly, though Dallas City Hall is almost as ugly as Boston's. They both look like they belong in Vladovostok, Russia or some other industrial armpit in Siberia.

Last edited by Champ le monstre du lac; 12-31-2012 at 09:02 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-31-2012, 09:13 AM
 
3,004 posts, read 5,150,626 times
Reputation: 1547
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bslette View Post
All right, I'll go back to the original point of the thread.

Some large cities that in my opinion don't have a landmark. I'm not going by biggest cities either, I'm just naming some cities.

Indianapolis - It doesn't really have a big one, yet the motor speedway is still a landmark.
Portland, OR
San Diego
Milwaukee
Columbus
Jacksonville
Kansas City
Tampa
Pittsburgh
Nashville
Denver
Etc.
Most people do recognize Monument Circle. They might not say Soldiers & Sailors monument, no but it's not really referred to that in Indianapolis even though that is the official name. It's Monument Circle, the middle of the city and almost geographic middle of the state.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-31-2012, 09:30 AM
JJG
 
Location: Fort Worth
13,612 posts, read 22,904,705 times
Reputation: 7643
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nairobi View Post
Eighth Wonder of the World - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

You will find the Astrodome listed in that article. At the time that it was built, is was an architectural breakthrough, an American cultural phenomenon, and it remains an icon of the pro-sports world. Anyone who says otherwise simply has no idea what they're talking about.

If you weren't alive in the 70s, then ask your parents about the Astrodome, children.
I was born in the late 80's. I know the significance it has....
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-31-2012, 09:57 AM
 
Location: Up on the moon laughing down on you
18,495 posts, read 32,953,051 times
Reputation: 7752
Quote:
Originally Posted by jtur88 View Post
Phoenix, Houston, Dallas,Atlanta, Baltimore.
What??? Houston has multiple easily recognized buildings. Dallas has that dandelion/ microphone building, and has Olympic park and coke
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-31-2012, 10:01 AM
 
Location: Up on the moon laughing down on you
18,495 posts, read 32,953,051 times
Reputation: 7752
Quote:
Originally Posted by JJG View Post
I was born in the late 80's. I know the significance it has....
I was born in the 80s outside the us and even I know the significance it has.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-31-2012, 11:58 AM
 
Location: Baghdad by the Bay (San Francisco, California)
3,530 posts, read 5,136,325 times
Reputation: 3145
I believe the Astrodome has moved from landmark to eyesore. It was a remarkable achievement in sports stadiums and changed the game of baseball (and even football, to a great degree) for both better and worse. It is now a rotting corpse, though.

The Astrodome, in its prime represented the optimistic, can-do spirit of Houston. The city was inhospitable to big-league baseball in summer heat, torrential thunderstorms and mosquito swarms, so they brought the game inside. Purists balked, but everyone was amazed. Everyone considered it a priviledge just to be in the place. I remember standing in the field level seats as a kid and looking up at the massive roof in awe. It was truly an amazing engineering achievement.

It misses the landmark status today, in my opinion, because, while being a great engineering achievement it is not a great architectural one- like Golden Gate Bridge or The St. Louis Arch. It was showy and entertaining, with its scoreboard and Judge Hoffheinz's palatial playpen, but the more public spaces lacked any soul or flair. It was a big, soulless, concrete spaceship sitting in the middle of a square mile of concrete parking lot. Not exactly the most attractive representation for a city, but nonetheless, iconic.

Now, it is a victim of the Houston Texans. As the primary tenants of Reliant Park, they have blocked all attempts to refurbish the Astrodome, because it would create a competitive fixture for their parking revenues in the lots that they would share. They want the thing destroyed and looking at its present condition, its hard to argue with them. That doesn't make their behavior any less shameful, though.

Indeed, the Astrodome was once a landmark. It's a shame the vision that led to its creation wasn't employed in its preservation.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-31-2012, 12:08 PM
 
9,961 posts, read 17,524,172 times
Reputation: 9193
Quote:
Originally Posted by dalparadise View Post
I believe the Astrodome has moved from landmark to eyesore. It was a remarkable achievement in sports stadiums and changed the game of baseball (and even football, to a great degree) for both better and worse. It is now a rotting corpse, though.

The Astrodome, in its prime represented the optimistic, can-do spirit of Houston. The city was inhospitable to big-league baseball in summer heat, torrential thunderstorms and mosquito swarms, so they brought the game inside. Purists balked, but everyone was amazed. Everyone considered it a priviledge just to be in the place. I remember standing in the field level seats as a kid and looking up at the massive roof in awe. It was truly an amazing engineering achievement.

It misses the landmark status today, in my opinion, because, while being a great engineering achievement it is not a great architectural one- like Golden Gate Bridge or The St. Louis Arch. It was showy and entertaining, with its scoreboard and Judge Hoffheinz's palatial playpen, but the more public spaces lacked any soul or flair. It was a big, soulless, concrete spaceship sitting in the middle of a square mile of concrete parking lot. Not exactly the most attractive representation for a city, but nonetheless, iconic.

Now, it is a victim of the Houston Texans. As the primary tenants of Reliant Park, they have blocked all attempts to refurbish the Astrodome, because it would create a competitive fixture for their parking revenues in the lots that they would share. They want the thing destroyed and looking at its present condition, its hard to argue with them. That doesn't make their behavior any less shameful, though.

Indeed, the Astrodome was once a landmark. It's a shame the vision that led to its creation wasn't employed in its preservation.
Yeah, the fact that they're discussing tearing down the Astrodome sort of diminishes some of the claims to landmark status. Can you imagine anyone even daring to discuss tearing down Fenway Park or Wrigley Field?

At the time of it's construction it really would've been a really amazing sight--and for a long time the Astrodome was one of the most famous stadiums in the US.However, it's not even in use at this point, and I wonder how many Americans can pick the Astrodome out of a lineup of domed stadiums these days.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-31-2012, 12:10 PM
 
Location: Victoria TX
42,554 posts, read 86,977,099 times
Reputation: 36644
Quote:
Originally Posted by HtownLove View Post
What??? Houston has multiple easily recognized buildings. Dallas has that dandelion/ microphone building, and has Olympic park and coke
I guess if you drive past them everyday, you'd recognize them, but nobody outside Houston or Dallas has any idea what buildings you are talking abouit.

Thanks to the miracle of imaginative architecture, no two big public buildings look exactly alike, but that doesn't mean everybody in the world recognizes all of them.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-31-2012, 12:14 PM
 
Location: Victoria TX
42,554 posts, read 86,977,099 times
Reputation: 36644
Quote:
Originally Posted by Deezus View Post
Can you imagine anyone even daring to discuss tearing down Fenway Park or Wrigley Field?
. . . or Yankee Stadium?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S.

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top