Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > South Carolina > Greenville - Spartanburg area
 [Register]
Greenville - Spartanburg area Greenville - Spartanburg - Simpsonville - Greer - Easley - Taylors - Mauldin - Duncan
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 04-26-2018, 10:16 PM
 
Location: South Carolina
21,023 posts, read 27,262,444 times
Reputation: 6000

Advertisements

The City of Greenville does not need an increase in rinky-dink low rise buildings. It needs to be proactive in vertical growth by requiring a minimum height for new building construction.

As the redevelopment of Greenville County Square is a project of Greenville County, it should have input from and listen to the citizens of Greenville County.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 04-27-2018, 07:25 AM
 
1,279 posts, read 853,731 times
Reputation: 2055
The Libertarian in me thinks that if government can tell us, "you may not build a building unless it's tall enough to meet the taste of certain people", government has gotten too powerful.

Maybe government could instead focus on luring headquarters of corporations that will need enough office space to require a tall building.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-27-2018, 07:37 AM
 
2,781 posts, read 3,294,697 times
Reputation: 2164
I'm pretty underwhelmed with the design of this building. This is a unique property where there will really be one opportunity to get it right for the next 80 years or so. Once it's developed, we're stuck with it so I really hope they go back to the drawing board and come up with a more inspiring concept.

I think that since this property is currently owned by the government, it is probably appropriate to have more public input in the process that with a standard commercial property. They are using the profit from the project to build new government offices. Should be a win all around - new government offices and creation of a new tax base for the portion of the property that will become commercial.

I'll miss all of the extra free parking that currently exists at the site.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-27-2018, 07:47 AM
 
Location: Greenville, SC
5,238 posts, read 8,794,997 times
Reputation: 2647
Quote:
Originally Posted by Carolina Knight View Post
The City of Greenville does not need an increase in rinky-dink low rise buildings. It needs to be proactive in vertical growth by requiring a minimum height for new building construction.

As the redevelopment of Greenville County Square is a project of Greenville County, it should have input from and listen to the citizens of Greenville County.
I don't understand why some people REALLY want tall buildings in Greenville?





I do have my theories though.

Penis Envy: How Size Influences Self-Esteem – PsychologyTomorrowMagazine
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-27-2018, 07:55 AM
 
1,947 posts, read 2,760,501 times
Reputation: 1814
Quote:
Originally Posted by WhitewaterVol View Post
I'm pretty underwhelmed with the design of this building. This is a unique property where there will really be one opportunity to get it right for the next 80 years or so. Once it's developed, we're stuck with it so I really hope they go back to the drawing board and come up with a more inspiring concept.

I think that since this property is currently owned by the government, it is probably appropriate to have more public input in the process that with a standard commercial property. They are using the profit from the project to build new government offices. Should be a win all around - new government offices and creation of a new tax base for the portion of the property that will become commercial.

I'll miss all of the extra free parking that currently exists at the site.
From experience, public input just slows things down. You get too many opinions from folks that have agenda’s. It’s either my way or no way. It leaves too many unhappy with the final decision. That is why there are elected officials and assigned committees to make right choices. The public need to trust and accept those in charge are making the right decisions. Greenville is blessed with good forward decision makers.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-27-2018, 08:34 AM
 
Location: Greenville SC 'Waterfall City'
10,105 posts, read 7,409,249 times
Reputation: 4077
I think they should go for a mountain villa / ski lodge type of look given its location near Falls Park.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-27-2018, 05:46 PM
 
Location: Greenville, SC
401 posts, read 379,547 times
Reputation: 442
At first glance a few days ago, I wasn't sure what to think. Then I did some reading about this group of developers and they are impressive. I think these conceptual drawings represent the basics of the plan. A major impact game changing building fronting the site and a building with height in the center. These guys know what they're doing.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-27-2018, 06:33 PM
 
Location: South Carolina
21,023 posts, read 27,262,444 times
Reputation: 6000
Quote:
Originally Posted by Art123 View Post
I don't understand why some people REALLY want tall buildings in Greenville?





I do have my theories though.

Penis Envy: How Size Influences Self-Esteem – PsychologyTomorrowMagazine
Many of us do not understand why some people really want short buildings then complain later about not having enough space.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-27-2018, 06:39 PM
 
Location: South Carolina
21,023 posts, read 27,262,444 times
Reputation: 6000
Quote:
Originally Posted by WhitewaterVol View Post
I'm pretty underwhelmed with the design of this building. This is a unique property where there will really be one opportunity to get it right for the next 80 years or so. Once it's developed, we're stuck with it so I really hope they go back to the drawing board and come up with a more inspiring concept.

I think that since this property is currently owned by the government, it is probably appropriate to have more public input in the process that with a standard commercial property. They are using the profit from the project to build new government offices. Should be a win all around - new government offices and creation of a new tax base for the portion of the property that will become commercial.

I'll miss all of the extra free parking that currently exists at the site.
Greenville County has the opportunity to bring something unique to the City of Greenville. I would hate to see it fail.

Will Greenville County have public input with the proposed renderings?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-27-2018, 06:43 PM
 
Location: South Carolina
21,023 posts, read 27,262,444 times
Reputation: 6000
Quote:
Originally Posted by furmanpals View Post
From experience, public input just slows things down. You get too many opinions from folks that have agenda’s. It’s either my way or no way. It leaves too many unhappy with the final decision. That is why there are elected officials and assigned committees to make right choices. The public need to trust and accept those in charge are making the right decisions. Greenville is blessed with good forward decision makers.
You have one chance to do something right the first time. Make it count.

I am yet to see good forward decision makers for Greenville's future.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:




Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > South Carolina > Greenville - Spartanburg area

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top