Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Economics > Investing
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 05-19-2016, 09:52 AM
 
26,194 posts, read 21,601,431 times
Reputation: 22772

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by BeerGeek40 View Post
Yep that was a bad prediction. What can I say.


You also called for a 20% decline in the market in October which never materialized
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 05-19-2016, 09:55 AM
 
Location: Pennsylvania
31,340 posts, read 14,281,167 times
Reputation: 27863
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lowexpectations View Post
You also called for a 20% decline in the market in October which never materialized
Don't forget this one. Which DID materialize.
02-21-2016, 06:56 PM
[SIZE=5]BeerGeek40[/SIZE]
Senior Member

Edit Status
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Pennsylvania
1,046 posts, read 517,918 times
Reputation: 1414



MasterCard is at $87 roughly.


$95 is almost a sure thing unless the entire market tanks.

[RIGHT] [/RIGHT]
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-19-2016, 10:11 AM
 
26,194 posts, read 21,601,431 times
Reputation: 22772
Quote:
Originally Posted by BeerGeek40 View Post
Don't forget this one. Which DID materialize.
02-21-2016, 06:56 PM
[SIZE=5]BeerGeek40[/SIZE]
Senior Member

Edit Status
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Pennsylvania
1,046 posts, read 517,918 times
Reputation: 1414



MasterCard is at $87 roughly.


$95 is almost a sure thing unless the entire market tanks.

[RIGHT] [/RIGHT]


No you surely got that one right but that collectively supports the point what what you "know" right? I mean in reality throwing out enough guesses means you'd get some right and some wrong

It's also interesting to look at other names closely associated with your call for relative performance

Ma +10.40% since your call
V +8.44%
AXP +16.6%
SPY +7.27%
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-19-2016, 10:47 AM
 
Location: SoCal
20,160 posts, read 12,769,893 times
Reputation: 16993
I didnt time the stock market in 2013. I felt it was very positive. Only in 2014 hat I felt the market was getting tired. But I didn't get out right away. Every time we had a high in 2015, I went slowly into cash. But I want to make sure I sold higher than I bought. I'm still far ahead in international fund like the I fund. I only remember I sold at around $26, it is now still $23-$24 time frame. But I did buy back some in Feb of this year. I think around $21-22. I only remember the price I sold and try to get back with a bit discount. Not smart but damn lucky.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-19-2016, 11:02 AM
 
Location: Pennsylvania
31,340 posts, read 14,281,167 times
Reputation: 27863
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lowexpectations View Post
No you surely got that one right but that collectively supports the point what what you "know" right? I mean in reality throwing out enough guesses means you'd get some right and some wrong

It's also interesting to look at other names closely associated with your call for relative performance

Ma +10.40% since your call
V +8.44%
AXP +16.6%
SPY +7.27%
Thanks for giving me credit.
I have been also discussing PCN on these boards which I bought for the retirement fund n December, rode it up 6% + payouts, and then sold it all a few days back....just before it started tanking.


I get some wrong and some right -- like anyone. I was way wrong in 2013....
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-19-2016, 11:46 AM
 
Location: Oregon, formerly Texas
10,069 posts, read 7,245,793 times
Reputation: 17146
I feel like there is a correction to at least Dow 15,000 due at some point in the near to medium term. Maybe 13,000 but I find that less likely.

I don't see anything that would cause a 60% drop like in 2008-09. The banks seem to be relatively healthy. Our big national economic problem is income/wealth inequality that causes slow growth, but that is like a festering sore, not an unexpected shock. The markets can do fine even when a lot of main street is just muddling along.

The real problem in 2007-08 was not that no one realized the market was inflated, is was that no one was quite congnizant of how far the rabbit hole went with CDOs, default swaps, etc... Smart people knew that sub-prime mortgages were bad. But what should have been a 20% correction turned out to be much worse because of the corrupt dealing going on that almost destroyed the banks.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-19-2016, 12:05 PM
 
Location: moved
13,660 posts, read 9,724,335 times
Reputation: 23487
Quote:
Originally Posted by redguard57 View Post
I feel like there is a correction to at least Dow 15,000 due at some point in the near to medium term. Maybe 13,000 but I find that less likely.

I don't see anything that would cause a 60% drop like in 2008-09. The banks seem to be relatively healthy. Our big national economic problem is income/wealth inequality that causes slow growth, but that is like a festering sore, not an unexpected shock. The markets can do fine even when a lot of main street is just muddling along.

The real problem in 2007-08 was not that no one realized the market was inflated, is was that no one was quite congnizant of how far the rabbit hole went with CDOs, default swaps, etc... Smart people knew that sub-prime mortgages were bad. But what should have been a 20% correction turned out to be much worse because of the corrupt dealing going on that almost destroyed the banks.
You may be entirely right about the "correction" to 15,000 (or even lower). We just don't know. But what irritates me is the incessant drumbeat of insistence, from so many directions, that the present market is somehow "incorrect". We had October 2014; anybody remember that? Then August 2015. Then January-February 2016. These were all ~10% "corrections". How many more "corrections" do we need, with no net growth in between, to atone for our sins? How many more dips and drops and crises of the moment? It's as if long-term equity investors are collectively guilty of hubris, greed and indifference. It's as if people who actually don't live paycheck-to-paycheck need to tithe to provide succor for the poor unfortunates who in a famous recent study can't come up with $400.

2007-2008 completely blindsided me. Living in the rural Midwest, we had no housing bubble. Our real-estate prices in 2007 were at late-1990s level. We had no interest-only mortgages or teaser-rates or rampant flipping. Not having a television, I didn't know about the waitresses in Miami buying McMansions with no money down, or guys in NYC tricking other guys in NYC to trick other guys in NYC with synthetic CDOs. The market-high in 2007 felt like the long-sought return to normalcy after a grueling start to the 21st century. Far from the advent of a new era of prosperity, October 2007 felt like the culmination of a long and tortuous convalescence. Instead it was a slide and then a freefall into abject horror.

And now instead of receiving credit for enduring the past 16 years, we hear that we're chumps and idiots for retaining belief in the market. Sometimes I really wish that ominous black sedans would go driveway to driveway at 3 am, visiting the short-sellers and the like, whisking them quietly away to labor camps in Alaska. Sorry. I couldn't help myself. It's America in 2016, not Russia in 1937. But sometimes the similarities are uncanny.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-19-2016, 12:32 PM
 
18,114 posts, read 15,690,551 times
Reputation: 26820
One way to ensure you don't make emotional moves or attempt to time the market is to set yourself up for regular investing on a schedule. Obviously this is best for investing in funds/ETF, instead of single stocks unless you plan to hold a single stock for a very long time.

Not just 401K contributions, but contributions made outside of payroll into other investments which would be post-tax. If you "set it and forget it" so monies are taken out of your savings or checking and invested automatically, the feelings of anxiety that often accompanies it can be abated if you don't watch the market every day.

Is ignorance bliss? It is if you decide you're in this for the long haul and until you need the money, which for most people is during retirement AND you have a significant time horizon (over 10 years).

In 2008 I was not watching the market at all. I was saving money and contributing whatever I was at the time to the company 401K funds. I didn't panic because I was unaware of what was happening in my funds (ignorance was bliss). I didn't look at the statements. Ultimately I knew I needed to keep working and keep saving, so that's what I did. I was more concerned with staying employed in those years. I had a chunk 'o cash at that point, but at no time did I exit the market or change my allocation of the monies that were invested. Aside from 401K contributions, I didn't throw more cash into the market either though, which of course I wish I had done in early 2009. But what was invested stayed invested and rose back up, without my interference.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-19-2016, 01:25 PM
 
Location: Oregon, formerly Texas
10,069 posts, read 7,245,793 times
Reputation: 17146
Quote:
Originally Posted by lottamoxie View Post
One way to ensure you don't make emotional moves or attempt to time the market is to set yourself up for regular investing on a schedule. Obviously this is best for investing in funds/ETF, instead of single stocks unless you plan to hold a single stock for a very long time.

Not just 401K contributions, but contributions made outside of payroll into other investments which would be post-tax. If you "set it and forget it" so monies are taken out of your savings or checking and invested automatically, the feelings of anxiety that often accompanies it can be abated if you don't watch the market every day.

Is ignorance bliss? It is if you decide you're in this for the long haul and until you need the money, which for most people is during retirement AND you have a significant time horizon (over 10 years).

In 2008 I was not watching the market at all. I was saving money and contributing whatever I was at the time to the company 401K funds. I didn't panic because I was unaware of what was happening in my funds (ignorance was bliss). I didn't look at the statements. Ultimately I knew I needed to keep working and keep saving, so that's what I did. I was more concerned with staying employed in those years. I had a chunk 'o cash at that point, but at no time did I exit the market or change my allocation of the monies that were invested. Aside from 401K contributions, I didn't throw more cash into the market either though, which of course I wish I had done in early 2009. But what was invested stayed invested and rose back up, without my interference.
You were lucky you were employed. That was a luxury. Recall that 800,000 jobs a month were being lost during that period.

In my case, I was just out of school and had just recently been hired so was first fired in the inevitable RIFs that occurred in a crisis. I had sunk my life's savings in mutual funds... without a job I needed the cash especially when I had a family member get sick & had to sell my shares at an almost 50% loss.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-19-2016, 02:13 PM
 
18,114 posts, read 15,690,551 times
Reputation: 26820
Quote:
Originally Posted by redguard57 View Post
You were lucky you were employed. That was a luxury. Recall that 800,000 jobs a month were being lost during that period.
I was lucky in 2008. The layoff axe hit me in 2011 though and I spent a year looking.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Economics > Investing

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top