Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Nevada > Las Vegas
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 06-14-2015, 03:05 PM
 
848 posts, read 648,537 times
Reputation: 672

Advertisements

From the Las Vegas Review-Journal...

Water isn't a worry when it comes to Las Vegas Growth

Return flows deserve all credit for Las Vegas' water supply
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 06-14-2015, 03:41 PM
 
12,973 posts, read 15,807,980 times
Reputation: 5478
Quote:
Originally Posted by ND_Irish View Post
Not just the return flow credit though that certainly is important...but the whole placement of Las Vegas with respect to the dam. If it can't get passed the dam we get it all.

So we should gracefully grow to 3 million or so. Eventually it ends but not for a long time.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-14-2015, 04:01 PM
 
Location: Las Vegas, NV
165 posts, read 209,439 times
Reputation: 153
Quote:
Originally Posted by ND_Irish View Post
I've been trying to get people to understand this for ages. You don't really save any water with low flow shower heads or toilets. It's all getting treated in the wastewater facility and going back into the loop for someone else to use. Landscape irrigation and evaporation of pool water is where water is actually lost from the system.

All you are really doing with all that low flow BS is reducing the size requirements for the water treatment plants. You aren't really "saving" any water.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-14-2015, 04:06 PM
 
12,973 posts, read 15,807,980 times
Reputation: 5478
Quote:
Originally Posted by NDJeff View Post
I've been trying to get people to understand this for ages. You don't really save any water with low flow shower heads or toilets. It's all getting treated in the wastewater facility and going back into the loop for someone else to use. Landscape irrigation and evaporation of pool water is where water is actually lost from the system.

All you are really doing with all that low flow BS is reducing the size requirements for the water treatment plants. You aren't really "saving" any water.
There are losses and it is not any place near 100% so you still want to conserve particularly if it is easy conservation. But it does make the logic of cleaning up sewage for golf and park use rather dull. That does reuse the water but ends up with close to a complete loss.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-14-2015, 10:42 PM
 
Location: Henderson
1,245 posts, read 1,829,220 times
Reputation: 948
Quote:
Originally Posted by lvoc View Post
Not just the return flow credit though that certainly is important...but the whole placement of Las Vegas with respect to the dam. If it can't get passed the dam we get it all.

So we should gracefully grow to 3 million or so. Eventually it ends but not for a long time.
Wrong, Nevada would get about 270,000 acre feet a year regardless of what other States can get. The Vegas Valley would have a hard time getting to 2.25 million with the current water supply. The pipeline dream to the north is totally, totally dead.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-14-2015, 10:44 PM
 
12,973 posts, read 15,807,980 times
Reputation: 5478
Quote:
Originally Posted by bayview6 View Post
Wrong, Nevada would get about 270,000 acre feet a year regardless of what other States can get. The Vegas Valley would have a hard time getting to 2.25 million with the current water supply. The pipeline dream to the north is totally, totally dead.
If you think that you lack understanding of Nevada politics and water law.

And if you want to see the pipeline occur instantly just cut off the return credit.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-15-2015, 12:33 AM
 
625 posts, read 797,470 times
Reputation: 350
Quote:
Originally Posted by LuisSuarez View Post
10 Percent of California’s Water Goes to Almond Farming a stunning 1.1 trillion gallons of water each year. It would not bother me if I never ate another almond in the rest of my life.

10 percent of California’s water goes to almond farming.

Check the stats on water used for meat, and this whole demonizing almonds becomes ridiculous.

Cows Suck Up More Water Than Almonds - Bloomberg View

Seriously, Stop Demonizing Almonds

Real villain in the California drought isn't almonds
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-15-2015, 07:04 AM
 
Location: Henderson
1,245 posts, read 1,829,220 times
Reputation: 948
Quote:
Originally Posted by lvoc View Post
If you think that you lack understanding of Nevada politics and water law.

And if you want to see the pipeline occur instantly just cut off the return credit.
You are the guy who said that the Nevada Supreme Court would cover the back of the State Engineer. In two separate decisions the Nevada Supreme Court stated that the State Engineer would have to comply with the District Judge instructions. Since the State Engineer had previously stated that he could not make those determinations, it seems clear that the northern pipeline is not going anywhere. Moreover, the opponents of the pipeline have not even started on protecting their federal rights.

Anyway, the return credit is not going to disappear. There is no rational reason on this little green earth to remove it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-15-2015, 07:19 AM
 
Location: Salt Lake City/Las Vegas
1,596 posts, read 2,812,673 times
Reputation: 1902
It's short-sighted to think water shortages won't impact Las Vegas. Even if the allocations to Las Vegas remain viable, it does not mean we will not suffer.

Keep in mind the surrounding states will have their economies hampered by water shortages. As we discovered during the last recession, Las Vegas is hit hard by only a 5% drop in tourism. A 10% drop - devastating. Which state provides us with the most tourists? Yep, California.

So, think twice before saying something like, "This is California's problem, not ours." If California is significantly impacted by water shortages, the Las Vegas economy will feel it. Like it or not, our fate is tied to our neighbors. Their water problems ARE our water problems.

Bill
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-15-2015, 09:02 AM
 
12,973 posts, read 15,807,980 times
Reputation: 5478
Quote:
Originally Posted by UTES View Post
It's short-sighted to think water shortages won't impact Las Vegas. Even if the allocations to Las Vegas remain viable, it does not mean we will not suffer.

Keep in mind the surrounding states will have their economies hampered by water shortages. As we discovered during the last recession, Las Vegas is hit hard by only a 5% drop in tourism. A 10% drop - devastating. Which state provides us with the most tourists? Yep, California.

So, think twice before saying something like, "This is California's problem, not ours." If California is significantly impacted by water shortages, the Las Vegas economy will feel it. Like it or not, our fate is tied to our neighbors. Their water problems ARE our water problems.

Bill
California can fix its water problems at any time to whatever degree it wishes. It has huge water resources. Agriculture still receives water at very low prices. CA can simply make that water or part of it salable which would pretty much solve the problems of at least the southern portion of the state. And that is the piece Las Vegas is sensitive to...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Settings
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2000-2020 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Nevada > Las Vegas

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:36 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top