Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Massachusetts
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 12-03-2014, 11:59 AM
 
Location: Westwood, MA
5,037 posts, read 6,926,821 times
Reputation: 5961

Advertisements

I'm generally in favor of increased commuter rail service, but I don't think the benefits of a single commuter rail stop justify the cost. I also suspect that these trains will cause problems with the heavily-traveled Franklin line. My friend from Walpole is pretty opposed to the project for these reasons as well as increased rail traffic through town.

Walpole residents vow to stop deal to bring full-time commuter r - Boston News, Weather, Sports | FOX 25 | MyFoxBoston

I'm also not a big fan of the way that this is being done, as it seems like a lot of money is being spent to make the Kraft's property investment more lucrative. Given a finite transportation budget I think it would be better spent on projects more people want.

I'm interested to hear other opinions, though. Are Foxboro residents supportive of this move because it will make commuter rail transit easier?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 12-03-2014, 12:28 PM
 
1,768 posts, read 3,242,024 times
Reputation: 1592
Silly. There is always benefit to expanding public transportation options. Boston metro is growing, and so is the need for more commuter rail stops and options. We are not in Kansas anymore (nothing against Kansas). Really backward knee-jerk reaction.

Walpole people better deal with it in more constructive manner. I am personally tired of NIMBY. If you want things to always stay the same, pretend it is 1980, with places dead and with little traffic, move elsewhere. So many areas like that all over the US. You can not have your cake, and eat it too. Everything changes.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-03-2014, 12:48 PM
 
Location: North of Boston
560 posts, read 752,109 times
Reputation: 656
i think they are more upset about how it happened than anything else.

but they have a valid point. it stops only at Gillette. if they made the stop in town somewhere with shuttles for games i think that's different. this doesn't benefit anyone one doing a daily commute into the city.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-03-2014, 01:09 PM
 
1,768 posts, read 3,242,024 times
Reputation: 1592
It is great to have an option for Gillette. It helps traffic. If Walpole people can see the light, they can realize some gains too or needed upgrades from MBTA as well. They are not playing it well. And why would they be throwing hissy fit about Foxboro's business?

Whenever there is a change, there is always this strong knee-jerk negative reaction that wastes time and good will. More commuter rail stops we can get, the better. We can start losing business and screw our economy because of outdated undersized infrastructure. You can not have it both ways.

Since public sector is so screwed up to not investing and expanding, it may very well be that private sector picks up the slack and make things happen in the next decade or two. Self-serving kind obviously.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-03-2014, 02:25 PM
 
Location: Massachusetts & Hilton Head, SC
10,024 posts, read 15,671,828 times
Reputation: 8669
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shizim View Post
i think they are more upset about how it happened than anything else.

but they have a valid point. it stops only at Gillette. if they made the stop in town somewhere with shuttles for games i think that's different. this doesn't benefit anyone one doing a daily commute into the city.
That station is going to be very busy!

I can understand why the people in Walpole who live near Rte. 1 would be upset, though. Passenger trains will be running all day through their neighborhood.

Does anyone know what the plan is for the CSX trains?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-03-2014, 02:30 PM
 
Location: North of Boston
560 posts, read 752,109 times
Reputation: 656
Quote:
Originally Posted by kingeorge View Post
It is great to have an option for Gillette. It helps traffic. If Walpole people can see the light, they can realize some gains too or needed upgrades from MBTA as well. They are not playing it well. And why would they be throwing hissy fit about Foxboro's business?
it does for events there only. they are few and far between. for a $23MM+ cost. IDK....
But i do agree, its in foxboro, not sure why they are upset.
if it was a two stop build with one in town and one at gillette i think its a no brainer.

Quote:
Originally Posted by kingeorge View Post
Whenever there is a change, there is always this strong knee-jerk negative reaction that wastes time and good will. More commuter rail stops we can get, the better. We can start losing business and screw our economy because of outdated undersized infrastructure. You can not have it both ways.
is our infrastructure so bad its costing us business? not being argumentative but can you explain to me how. i am genuinely interested. I dont actually think its THAT bad. i feel people will just complain about it no matter how good/bad it is. There are plenty of major US cities that aren't anywhere as old or densely populated with inferior buildouts.

I am for building out the commuter rail. but i think if they announced this stop as part of a series of new ones vs a Gillette only stop the reaction would have been different.

Quote:
Originally Posted by kingeorge View Post
Since public sector is so screwed up to not investing and expanding, it may very well be that private sector picks up the slack and make things happen in the next decade or two. Self-serving kind obviously.
is this an issue of individual cities having power vs. county government. doing whats good for the region vs whats good for the individual town?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-03-2014, 02:44 PM
 
Location: Massachusetts & Hilton Head, SC
10,024 posts, read 15,671,828 times
Reputation: 8669
Shizim, there's an existing stop at Gillette. It's used for the Patriots train that runs during the season. I don't think the residents of Foxborough would want a station in the downtown area. I don't know where you'd put it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-03-2014, 03:01 PM
 
Location: 42°22'55.2"N 71°24'46.8"W
4,848 posts, read 11,815,153 times
Reputation: 2962
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shizim View Post
i think they are more upset about how it happened than anything else.

but they have a valid point. it stops only at Gillette. if they made the stop in town somewhere with shuttles for games i think that's different. this doesn't benefit anyone one doing a daily commute into the city.
I think I missed something. Why wouldn't it benefit commuters going into the city? Couldn't the MBTA negotiate with the Krafts to use the lot adjacent to the rail platform for commuter parking?


Quote:
Originally Posted by CaseyB View Post
Shizim, there's an existing stop at Gillette. It's used for the Patriots train that runs during the season. I don't think the residents of Foxborough would want a station in the downtown area. I don't know where you'd put it.
I don't know how much track they're buying, but wouldn't the southern part of town near the highway be a good place to put a commuter rail stop right off I-95? It could even have a dedicated exit off the highway in addition to the local street access.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-03-2014, 03:13 PM
 
23,575 posts, read 18,722,077 times
Reputation: 10824
This is an extremely inefficient use of money. The T is overstretched, inadequately maintained and deteriorating on the CURRENT lines. When all lines, tracks, stations etc. are brought up to acceptable modern standards and with a proper funding source; then maybe I'd take more seriously a need for a whole new line/spur with one stop on it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-03-2014, 03:16 PM
 
Location: 42°22'55.2"N 71°24'46.8"W
4,848 posts, read 11,815,153 times
Reputation: 2962
Is that $23M price tag just to purchase the tracks? Is any rehabilitation work required to handle more frequent traffic or higher speeds?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Settings
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2000-2020 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Massachusetts

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:09 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top