Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Massachusetts
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 06-22-2023, 07:33 PM
 
2,710 posts, read 1,736,446 times
Reputation: 1319

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by yesmaybe View Post
There are a ton of people here living paycheck to paycheck... even in million dollar homes. That's how crazy things have gotten.
But you guys make it sound like all of them are.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 06-22-2023, 07:35 PM
 
2,710 posts, read 1,736,446 times
Reputation: 1319
Quote:
Originally Posted by newenglandgal123 View Post
ok, they could also sell their crypto and just pay cash for their house....how's that?
They could also hold it. Some people are comfortable having debt if they have liquid assets that can be sold anytime.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-23-2023, 07:12 AM
 
Location: North of Boston
560 posts, read 751,772 times
Reputation: 656
Quote:
Originally Posted by msRB311 View Post
Would have been nice if companies kept WFH around but too much greed and insecurity there as well. That was an option so that people weren't forced to drive or take the train but sounds like people don't like this either. This is why I get very irritated with this forum. WFH gave people an option to move further out to find better prices but nope. Let's keep folks miserable.
There are two different points here:

1. Greed and insecurity.
Not sure how ending WFH ties into greed. Can you clarify what you mean here? And while there is some middle management insecurity that works against WFH, i don't think that it is a big driver of the push back into the office. That decision is made way higher in the food chain.

And TBH, there is a real benefit to being in the office as a group. especially for younger people/those learning. I started a new job during COVID. It was brutal trying to onboard remotely.

2. Tying a businesses decision to end WFH with keeping folks miserable.
If I am a business and I i deem it necessary to have my people in the office a few days a week, that's it. The optionor move further out and if it makes people happy aren't really in the decision tree. Especially if its in an industry that can easily replace someone who doesn't want to commute.

I am not voicing an opinion one way or the other. I commute in 2x a week. Its annoying, but not life altering.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-23-2023, 09:48 AM
 
24,559 posts, read 18,269,032 times
Reputation: 40260
Quote:
Originally Posted by newenglandgal123 View Post
Whatever happened to the golden rule of no more than 25-30% of your gross income goes toward housing costs (mortgage, insurance, taxes or rent)? Is that even remotely possible for people to do nowadays based on the high cost of housing/rates/rents vs incomes not keeping up? I know if I were to sell and buy something else now the % of my income that goes toward housing would skyrocket and probably exceed that recommended % unless I got an even higher paying job. Pretty sad when you already make above the average HHI in MA and have to consider getting an even higher paying job solely for the purpose of trying to move/buy a different place.
The first thing I bought in 1988, that was just the rule. 28% of your gross for mortgage, taxes, & insurance. 33% total including other payments like school loans and cars. I bought 5% down so that 28% included PMI. Variable rate mortgage because nobody did fixed rate from the late-1970s onwards when hyperinflation made a fixed rate mortgage absurdly expensive. Until I had a couple years of raises and promotions, 28% was noticeable.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-23-2023, 09:53 AM
 
16,412 posts, read 8,198,277 times
Reputation: 11403
This might not be good news for many cape homeowners especially if the bought recently:

https://www.wbur.org/news/2023/06/21...stems-cape-cod
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-23-2023, 09:58 AM
 
24,559 posts, read 18,269,032 times
Reputation: 40260
Quote:
Originally Posted by msRB311 View Post
This might not be good news for many cape homeowners especially if the bought recently:

https://www.wbur.org/news/2023/06/21...stems-cape-cod
My town is 50% septic systems because so much of it is semi-rural. There’s been all kinds of town communication about this new set of regulations.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-23-2023, 11:09 AM
 
1,541 posts, read 1,125,554 times
Reputation: 740
Quote:
Originally Posted by newenglandgal123 View Post
Whatever happened to the golden rule of no more than 25-30% of your gross income goes toward housing costs (mortgage, insurance, taxes or rent)? Is that even remotely possible for people to do nowadays based on the high cost of housing/rates/rents vs incomes not keeping up? I know if I were to sell and buy something else now the % of my income that goes toward housing would skyrocket and probably exceed that recommended % unless I got an even higher paying job. Pretty sad when you already make above the average HHI in MA and have to consider getting an even higher paying job solely for the purpose of trying to move/buy a different place.
It is certainly possible. Didn't we take a poll last year? Most of the responders housing costs were in the low 20% range of gross income. Of course there's selection bias and that doesn't mean everybody's is...but it is possible.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-23-2023, 11:20 AM
 
3,626 posts, read 1,844,995 times
Reputation: 1512
Quote:
Originally Posted by simplexsimon View Post
It is certainly possible. Didn't we take a poll last year? Most of the responders housing costs were in the low 20% range of gross income. Of course there's selection bias and that doesn't mean everybody's is...but it is possible.
Right, that was last year before we were in the height of this inflation. Now that childcare, food, maintenance, property tax, insurance etc. costs have all gone up substantially I wonder how many can still say that?!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-23-2023, 11:47 AM
 
1,541 posts, read 1,125,554 times
Reputation: 740
Quote:
Originally Posted by newenglandgal123 View Post
Right, that was last year before we were in the height of this inflation. Now that childcare, food, maintenance, property tax, insurance etc. costs have all gone up substantially I wonder how many can still say that?!
Of those that responded? I think they were all homeowners and am confident all of them can still say their housing costs are in the low 20% range right now unless they moved. Childcare and food aren't part of the calculation.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-23-2023, 12:41 PM
 
3,626 posts, read 1,844,995 times
Reputation: 1512
Quote:
Originally Posted by simplexsimon View Post
Of those that responded? I think they were all homeowners and am confident all of them can still say their housing costs are in the low 20% range right now unless they moved. Childcare and food aren't part of the calculation.
You'd be surprised what a town revaluation can do to property taxes....also don't forget insurance skyrocketed this year too. Some folks might no longer be in that % as a result of those two things increasing.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Settings
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2000-2020 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Massachusetts

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top