Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
I think the problem with that is that a lot of men perceive that the minute they do that, they lose everything. House, kids, significant chunk of income, ordered to cover college expenses and they are living in their parents basement depressed until they are 60 years old.
It's incredible short-sighted to think that the consequences of murdering the spouse are ever preferable over enduring the emotional/financial pain of a divorce. At least with the latter, you're free, get to rebuild, and you haven't destroyed a bunch of other lives.
I think the problem with that is that a lot of men perceive that the minute they do that, they lose everything. House, kids, significant chunk of income, ordered to cover college expenses and they are living in their parents basement depressed until they are 60 years old.
lol, ok that seems like a bit of an exaggeration but made me LOL.
It does seems like these days with what people pay for homes, incomes, 401ks and kids of course there is more to lose when you get divorced. I can't figure out why killing someone is what some think is the better option.
From what I've read this couple met in 2008 and didn't marry until 2015. They seemed to know each other well. Perhaps having 3 kids in 4 years put them over the edge.
lol, ok that seems like a bit of an exaggeration but made me LOL.
It does seems like these days with what people pay for homes, incomes, 401ks and kids of course there is more to lose when you get divorced. I can't figure out why killing someone is what some think is the better option.
From what I've read this couple met in 2008 and didn't marry until 2015. They seemed to know each other well. Perhaps having 3 kids in 4 years put them over the edge.
If that Daily Mail article is true, seems she may have been a bit shady too. How do you not know and are ok with the fact that your husband purchased you a Maserati and Prada fashion with funds he swindled from someone? Also a bit odd all their properties were only in her name. Makes me think since he had all these charges already pending on him from fraud that it was a way to safeguard the money.
I think the problem with that is that a lot of men perceive that the minute they do that, they lose everything. House, kids, significant chunk of income, ordered to cover college expenses and they are living in their parents basement depressed until they are 60 years old.
Seems to me the only think he was going to lose was a gorgeous wife and meal ticket. They lived a bougie life much of it with ill-gained money. Not only did he rip off the Warhol buyer, he stole from his father’s estate.
If that Daily Mail article is true, seems she may have been a bit shady too. How do you not know and are ok with the fact that your husband purchased you a Maserati and Prada fashion with funds he swindled from someone? Also a bit odd all their properties were only in her name. Makes me think since he had all these charges already pending on him from fraud that it was a way to safeguard the money.
I think it's pretty obvious they were both into money/image. Easy to see that from looking at her IG account. She should have opened her eyes a bit more on where his money was coming from.
There's so much about them I found odd, particularly her living in another city all week away from her young kids.
My sister in law is an attorney, her and I were texting about this case. If we were convinced it was the husband as lay people (long before the latest info came out).........you know the detectives had this one figured out in the first 5 minutes too! They just had to nail the case down with hard evidence.
Yeah well according to Jim Gaffigan if you watch enough Dateline you realize that most marriages end in murder.
I'm sure the police usually assume the husband is suspect #1. The fact that they were so quickly able to gather so much hard evidence against him tells me two things . . .
1. This likely was not premeditated. The guy did such an absolutely awful job covering up his tracks that there's just no way he thought this out ahead of time.
2. This guy is a dolt. I mean they found tons of evidence right in the basement pretty quickly and googling things like "how to dispose of a body" on your own computer is just moronic.
I was just reading that because of his house arrest/ankle bracelet thing there were certain communities he wasn't allowed to go to. He ended up traveling to Brockton and Abington in part of this timeline and those were unapproved communities for him to be in.
I'm thinking DSS probably should have been involved with this family but i don't think they were. Anyone who is on house arrest for anything with 3 kids under 6 should absolute be getting visits from DSS.
I'm thinking DSS probably should have been involved with this family but i don't think they were. Anyone who is on house arrest for anything with 3 kids under 6 should absolute be getting visits from DSS.
DSS is overwhelmed with abuse and direct physical neglect from drugs and other severe cases. I think a house arrest would have been low on the emergency priority list, since the house arrest was for white-collar crime and not abuse.
If that Daily Mail article is true, seems she may have been a bit shady too. How do you not know and are ok with the fact that your husband purchased you a Maserati and Prada fashion with funds he swindled from someone? Also a bit odd all their properties were only in her name. Makes me think since he had all these charges already pending on him from fraud that it was a way to safeguard the money.
I'm sure the police usually assume the husband is suspect #1. The fact that they were so quickly able to gather so much hard evidence against him tells me two things . . .
1. This likely was not premeditated. The guy did such an absolutely awful job covering up his tracks that there's just no way he thought this out ahead of time.
2. This guy is a dolt. I mean they found tons of evidence right in the basement pretty quickly and googling things like "how to dispose of a body" on your own computer is just moronic.
Yes, I think they had a fight that night and it was not planned. Otherwise, he would have picked up his "supplies" earlier.
The cops should be checking dumpsters in Brocton and Abington, too. Maybe they are.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
re
