Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Urban...here's your problem: You think because someone is against MORE laws then they are automatically against ALL laws! That is simply....well arrogant, ignorant, naive, childish and silly!
Most people are FOR reasonable laws that, when enforced will make a difference, NOT frivolous laws that won't.
have fun with yourself I consider this matter closed from my end!
All I am saying is where I consider my line for laws are are different than yours, so by my standards, yes you do want less laws because where I want to see it sits much higher than yours because I would like it to check everyone and limit the availability of much more dangerous guns and ammunition clips. You just don't have any real solution other than more guns in people's hands which means easier ways to obtain guns which means less laws or laws that make it easier to acquires guns. That is the opposite of what I want.
As for your solution, it sounds like you are saying you want more people to be armed, which for that to happen would mean you want it to be easier for people to get weapons and CCW permits?
No, it just means more people should get CCW permits... by their own volition. He's said OVER AND OVER AGAIN that he doesn't want any change in the laws. How is this so hard to understand?
Quote:
Originally Posted by urbanlife78
Carry more bullets, shoot more people, less times to reload to do more damage. There is a reason why our military uses high capacity clips too.
The military does not use high capacity clips because they're NOT good at killing more people. They jam, they're heavy, they get in your way... Far better to just practice reloading a few times and be able to reload smaller magazines more quickly.
You seem to forget that the shooters terrifying drum magazine jammed, rendering the entire gun useless since he didn't have any other magazines...
Quote:
Originally Posted by urbanlife78
Oh my fault, you want more guns and easier access to guns cause that will solve all our problems....sometimes more and easier isn't the best idea.
Dude, seriously, read his posts. He doesn't want easier access. And sometimes fewer and harder isn't the best idea either.
Quote:
Originally Posted by urbanlife78
And you still haven't answered my question of what is your limit of what should be available to people
Yes he did. SERIOUSLY. READ OUR POSTS.
Quote:
Originally Posted by urbanlife78
What's the point of making anything illegal if that is how you wish to look at things...
Because laws make big differences in some areas, less in others. This is one in which laws have been proven to not make much of a difference.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kal.
Dude, he has an AR15 weapon. That weapon is considered an assault weapon.
Wrong.
Quote:
Originally Posted by urbanlife78
Outside of your gun club, that is considered an assault weapon.
Only because they don't know what an assault weapon is...
Quote:
Originally Posted by urbanlife78
You just don't have any real solution other than more guns in people's hands which means easier ways to obtain guns which means less laws or laws that make it easier to acquires guns.
Holy crapola. This is getting pointless. You're not paying us any attention at all are you?
WE
DID
NOT
ADVOCATE
FEWER
LAWS
It seems you have no real solution other than taking guns out of law-abiding citizens' hands.
Bloomberg is anti everything. He reminds me of a kid that was bullied in school and who became a rich man with a childish attitude and now takes his past out on everyone else.
I just heard on the news that if you are a female an carrying condoms in nyc you can be accused of being a prostitute.
So what next if you have a lic or permit to carry a gun does this mean you are going to kill someone?
Lets hope the next NYC Mayor brings back the FUN NYC.
except for the ruger 10/22 on top if left as semi auto they are all not legal for cosmetic reasons in nyc. whether they are semi auto or full auto does not matter in nyc as they are scarey and can't be registered.
the 10-22t on top can be converted to full auto but its not legal if you do it.
the rest of the country you could own them as long as they arent full auto. then you need a special permit if they are.
its a joke they are banned for being scarey looking here in the city. as long as not full auto no problem owning them in long island.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.