Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
When I smoked, it eliminated that sensation of hunger, and was cheaper than a Big Mac and fries. Two cigarettes at a dime apiece are much less than those food items.
Yea but prices for a pack of cigs are climbing up right now. It's about 7 bucks here. I can go get a whopper for 99 cents.
two of those 20 cigarettes eliminated my pangs--but I agree with you about the prices. My room mate still smokes. Generics, $4 a pack. Ridiculous. Glad I quit.
As long as I don't have to pay for your mistakes, whether it's obesity, lung cancer, etc. And as long as you do not use your use as an excuse for crimes that might be committed. When those things happen (i.e. with meth being a source of many identity thefts), when people expect the public to pay for their decisions, the public should have a say in whether those decisions are endorsed.
I don't think the government should pay for deliberate mistakes of adult excess. But what about fetal alcohol and drugs? Or childhood obesity? Could be a parental issue, but what about those with no parents? For those with parents, maybe parents should pay a bond to pay for the health risks their decisions or failures pose for their children. Just a theory idea. That might be deemed discriminatory or regressive. At some point, anarchy has limits.
As long as I don't have to pay for your mistakes, whether it's obesity, lung cancer, etc. And as long as you do not use your use as an excuse for crimes that might be committed. When those things happen (i.e. with meth being a source of many identity thefts), when people expect the public to pay for their decisions, the public should have a say in whether those decisions are endorsed.
I don't think the government should pay for deliberate mistakes of adult excess. But what about fetal alcohol and drugs? Or childhood obesity? Could be a parental issue, but what about those with no parents? For those with parents, maybe parents should pay a bond to pay for the health risks their decisions or failures pose for their children. Just a theory idea. That might be deemed discriminatory or regressive. At some point, anarchy has limits.
How about the idea that other people are NOT your responsibility, hmm?
God--you are dense. If I was still smoking, and I worked there, I would STILL be smoking AT WORK. I would STILL be providing ashtrays for the patrons.
Do you get it now? We were smoking there AFTER the law had passed.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.