Voter intimidation by the Black Panthers...help me out.

[East Coast Dem_PA]

lol I got news for all you Klan Supporters .. if it came down to a square off of the Klan and the BP's .. I'd bet my money on the Panthers with everything being equal.

Somewhat savy urban dwellers vs the local rednecks .. no brainer there.

Keep up with all this Tea Bagger Racist crap and you ALL just might get the fight/responce your asking for. Though I seriously don't think you'll like the consequences one you ignite that old flame lol.

[Indentured Servant]

Originally Posted by PCincorrect

You have stated several times that the NBPP wasn't there for voter intimidation. You have stated several times that other members here on CD have no proof of their assumptions about the BPP being at voting places to intimidate. You have countlessly stated that “It doesn’t make sense” followed by reasons YOU feel are clearly a case of a white folks getting in an uproar about nothing, but you have failed to prove why the BPP was there and you fail to acknowledge the possibility that they were there to intimidate white voters. You seem to enjoy pointing out the lack of proof of others to suit your agenda then filling us with nothing more than your opinion in turn, calling it fact.
Prove to me that the BPP was not there to intimidate white voters. I will not accept “It makes no sense” as a retort. Better yet (letting you off the hook) why were they there? Please provide the proof too.
Am I being too facetious?

The BPP was gathering at voting places to intimadate voters, why else would they be there? It's what a racist group does, it never makes sense to normal people.

Well...that is my point. Neither side can prove their case. There is REASONABLE DOUBT here and hence that is why the DOJ dropped it likely.

As I stated before, the justification that the NBPP gave makes more sense than the allegations against them. 2000 and 2004 elections were said to have a lot of hanky panky going on at black area precints....by conservative forces. I personally remember those stories from back then. So, from my understanding, the NBPP was attempting to guard against such hanky panky. If they were trying to intimidate anyone....it was an attempt to intimidate those who may be have been trying to suppress the black vote because the black vote = a democratic vote.

Now......a person like you would try to have others believe that the NBPP, an orginization that wanted to see a black man elected president, would try to intimidate voters from voting at a precinct where the majority of voters was likely casting a vote for Obama. Certainly if their goal was to intimidate white voters so that they could not vote against Obama then they would have went to a location in mostly white suburban areas. To prosecute THE ORGINIZATION one would have to prove that it was the INTENTIONS of the orginzation to intimidate voters and NOT the act of an individual member of the orginization.

[Ellis Bell]

Originally Posted by Indentured Servant

Well...that is my point. Neither side can prove their case. There is REASONABLE DOUBT here and hence that is why the DOJ dropped it likely.

As I stated before, the justification that the NBPP gave makes more sense than the allegations against them. 2000 and 2004 elections were said to have a lot of hanky panky going on at black area precints....by conservative forces. I personally remember those stories from back then. So, from my understanding, the NBPP was attempting to guard against such hanky panky. If they were trying to intimidate anyone....it was an attempt to intimidate those who may be have been trying to suppress the black vote because the black vote = a democratic vote.

Now......a person like you would try to have others believe that the NBPP, an orginization that wanted to see a black man elected president, would try to intimidate voters from voting at a precinct where the majority of voters was likely casting a vote for Obama. Certainly if their goal was to intimidate white voters so that they could not vote against Obama then they would have went to a location in mostly white suburban areas. To prosecute THE ORGINIZATION one would have to prove that it was the INTENTIONS of the orginzation to intimidate voters and NOT the act of an individual member of the orginization.

Hilary Clinton is a democrat. This incident was at the caucus for nomination. Everyone were told by the BP if they were voting for Hilary they would not be allowed to do so and to move along.

Hilary was made aware of what was going on. She tried to get help with the situation, but no one would listen to her.

I found a write up about it in the Canada Free Press, heard about it on the radio and thought, we're just hearing about this now...why?

This was not done Obama vs McCain....but Obama vs Hilary both democrats. The only reason there is a race card here is because one is black and one is white...Obama is both and is not African American, but Hawaiian.

[Convert 54]

Originally Posted by East Coast Dem_PA

lol I got news for all you Klan Supporters .. if it came down to a square off of the Klan and the BP's .. I'd bet my money on the Panthers with everything being equal.

Somewhat savy urban dwellers vs the local rednecks .. no brainer there.

Keep up with all this Tea Bagger Racist crap and you ALL just might get the fight/responce your asking for. Though I seriously don't think you'll like the consequences one you ignite that old flame lol.

Dude, not all klan are poor southern and red neck..............you need to maybe go to the storm front and take a little reading spell before you start spouting off the brothers gonna kick the whitey arse..............
there are a lot of urban savvy klaners out there and they are better armed than the typical raper..............so take a chill pill