Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 09-10-2010, 09:35 AM
 
Location: Oxford, England
13,026 posts, read 24,634,940 times
Reputation: 20165

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Boxcar Overkill View Post
Mooseketeer,

I greatly respect your opinion on this, but I don't think you go far enough in condemning Islam, (as opposed to condemning Muslims.)

I certainly concede that not all Muslims adhere to each principle of Islam, and the principles of Islam are somewhat in dispute. Still, wouldn't you agree that the ideology of Islam is:

1. Sexist.
2. Homophobic.
3. Anti-democratic
4. Repressive of descent.
5. At odds with liberalism.

Because you admittedly know and like a lot of Muslims, it seems like you go soft on Islam. Not radical Islam, but straightforward, right-out-of-the-book, mainstream Islam.

The fact that Islam is a religion should not protect it from criticism and condemnation. It's a really bad idea and it's an idea that doesn't deserve to be protected.


Actually I do agree that a lot of Islamic precepts are archaic and some downright repellent. I guess what I am trying to say is that some Islamic countries are in many ways behind us on many issues such as human rights and women's roles/ sexual orientation.

I think it would be extremely disingenuous of me to say that I would like to be a Muslim woman in many countries .

However my point is that Islam like Christianity is very much due to interpretation and that the undigestible things we see about it are in many ways on paper no worse than precepts in the Bible. The Bible taken literally is an abhorent violent, intolerant quite evil book. Especially the OT which compares quite well with the Qur'an.

Interpretations of the Qur'an have been dividing Muslim Scholars since the begining of Islam and still do. One only has to look at all the different sects to see that to begin with there is no such thing as one Universal Islam.

Islam like Christianity has been the vehicle for great violence, evil and extremism as many ways Christianity was in its days. To me what we are seeing in most Muslim countries nowadays is more cultural than religious, religion having been highjacked by various groups with political and economic agendas. The many being exploited by the few , intellectually speaking.


The vast majority of Muslims around the world live what we would consider economically deprived backgrounds, few have access to decent education and social ills such as poverty and ignorance do tend to breed a lot retrogade attitudes.

We in the West have only had the benefits of universal human rights and political stability . The idea that a Black man could vote or be considered a full human being was still greatly debated in the 60s by millions of people in the US and post colonial societies. We have not got the best record when it comes to being civilised IMO.

Some Muslim countries are basically going through their own version of our own ignorant prejudices. The difference is that in the West we had two world wars which brought much freedom for women economically and thus socially, we became reasonably stable politically and our standards of living also rose greatly. Education became widely available to more people, as did access to outside influences and all this has led to a social revolution .

Some Muslim countries need to go through this to access the same "wisdom" we have.


I do decry fanatic Islam, I really, really do. It frightens the hell out of me actually . Religious fanaticism to me is an intellectual aberration and especially dangerous as one cannot reason with those for whom reason is a perfect stranger. It is simply not possible and as such is a form of wilful insanity.

What I am trying to convey though is that all those retrograde, archaic attitudes many Muslims hold are more the product of a culture and of a certain socio-economic climate than of the Qur'an.

Muslims on the whole have co-existed in reasonable peaceable terms with their non Muslim neighbours until fairly recently and were certainly no more bellicose and prejudiced than we ourselves from the Judeo-Christian side did.

Fundamentalism has rise for many reasons, economic, social and cultural , and the people being radicalised have not been given a chance in many ways to be otherwise.

But if you travel a lot in Muslim countries you will find that most people are actually low key Muslims and that often it is more a question of social adherence than anything else. To me the issue is how to change those societies and to stop a tiny group of opportunists taking over.


The majority of Muslims are peaceful, hard working , decent human beings with the same concerns we have about life, love and the Universe. I genuinely believe the problem lies in raising standards of living, access to education , political stability etc.. . The Qur'an is being used as a tool for propaganda and to whip people into a frenzy. It is simply a way for a small group of extremists and power hungry bastards to enslave the people.

The Qur'an in essence has become the opium of a lot of people. The herd mentality sadly often prevails and brainwashing does occur.

I certainly would never deny that.

Secular Islam if that is not too much a contradition in terms is possible as is Secular Christianity. It just needs the right conditions for it. In that respect we the West are completely going the wrong way with the way we deal with the issue because we are providing fresh new conditions to render this impossible.


I have met thousands and thousands of Muslims and I can honestly say I have never met one who treated me badly, or was rude or nasty to me when they found out I was an Atheist for example. I think they felt some sadness I did not recognise God but all were tolerant and accepting. And incredbily hospitable.

I have been in sticky situations , getting lost etc.. in Muslim countries and have never been threatened in any way and always treated with the greatest of respect.

Mysoginy, homophobia etc... are terrible things but if we are honest how much ahead are we of the "barbaric" Muslims. Not that many years ahead if history serves me right.

It is in our interest to ensure that certain countries can blossom the way we blossomed and evolved. We had to evolve quite sharply when only 50 years ago a black man could not drink from the same water fountain as a white man . If one looks simply at the disparity in jail terms given for the same offence in Blacks and Whites even now nowadays I think it is reasy to realise we too still have great leaps to go before we can call ourselves modern.....

Many people on this forum for example would presume to tell me what to do with my body as a woman and some have called for Gay /Transgender people to be killed . This is from Christians in a country with a relatively higher standard of living than most Muslim countries, and with general access to better education in most cases. In 2011.

Islam is not the enemy. The way is Islam is highjacked, distorted and abused is.

I can find as many inflammatory violent verses in the Bible as in the Qur'an and let's face it Christians did use the literal interpretation of the Bible to cut down a hell of a lot of non Christians. Using God as a shield of self righteousness.

When religion becomes an organised social movement then you are always going to have a problem in my opinion especially with poverty and social exclusion being rife.

If people stuck to private faith and an introspective relationship with their Gods we would not have quite the same level of sectarianism.

In many ways we the West abuse, kill and maim far more than certain Islamic theocracies ( who by the way tend to abuse mostly their own people rather than us - the average Muslim is more victim than tortionnary ) by the way we do business and consume. The difference is we kill remotely and by stealth. Through unbridled greed and selfishness. Most of us will have been responsible for human suffering on an appalling scale simply because of our consumer choices.

Economic terrorism should be a crime as much as actual terrorism. It is no more benevolent and no more discriminating.

Ask the people in the Niger Delta about Shell and they'll have a few things to say about that. We exploit, diminish other human beings, deny them access to food, water, decent living conditions simply so we can save a few bucks and Mr Walmart can reap higher profits. Exactly what is the difference between killing thousands in the Twin towers and killing thousands for Oil ? (Is it because 9/11 happened on American soil and as such was seen as being a slap in the face . Is it that Western lives are seen as being of more value ? I think it is)

None. Both sets of victims are innocent and both die. A life is a life.

It is hard for us to hold the high moral ground when we look at our own history and current record on human rights and social justice.

Yes some Islamic countries are stuck in the middle ages. So were we until pretty recently and in many ways still are.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 09-10-2010, 09:39 AM
 
507 posts, read 678,754 times
Reputation: 364
I have not bothered to read this entire thread, so someone please correct me if I'm wrong...but has anyone mentioned that most/many of these Muslims are US citizens? How do you propose to "drum out" American citizens from their own country? Also, something like 20% of the Muslims in this country are black converts. Should they be kick out of their country as well? This thread is ridiculous.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-10-2010, 09:49 AM
 
344 posts, read 199,615 times
Reputation: 46
Quote:
Originally Posted by Boxcar Overkill View Post
Mooseketeer,

I greatly respect your opinion on this, but I don't think you go far enough in condemning Islam, (as opposed to condemning Muslims.)

I certainly concede that not all Muslims adhere to each principle of Islam, and the principles of Islam are somewhat in dispute. Still, wouldn't you agree that the ideology of Islam is:

1. Sexist.
2. Homophobic.
3. Anti-democratic
4. Repressive of descent.
5. At odds with liberalism.

Because you admittedly know and like a lot of Muslims, it seems like you go soft on Islam. Not radical Islam, but straightforward, right-out-of-the-book, mainstream Islam.

The fact that Islam is a religion should not protect it from criticism and condemnation. It's a really bad idea and it's an idea that doesn't deserve to be protected.
Christianity and every other major religion is sexist, homophobic, anti-democratic, repressive of descent, and at odds with liberalism. Yet, we don't seem to have this fervor against Christianity. Why? Essentially Christian nations (except in Africa) comprise the first world. Dubai, Qatar, Tunisia, Bahrain, and Kuwait allow many more freedoms than Afghanistan, Yemen, or Iran. The first group of nations are relatively wealthy (or extremely wealthy).

The main issue is truly an issue of wealth disparity. Wealth placates nations. We know this. Wealth allows for liberal pursuits to occur. Qatar passed legislation to allow women to wear what they will. Qatar has universal suffrage. Yet Qatar was initially based on Sharia law. What changed? Oil and financial wealth flowed through the nation. The government built schools and created a highly educated population. Those people had children that now don't truly remember a time when Qatari law was as strict as Saudi law (while strict wasn't fully enforced when I was a kid...maybe things changed). Same thing as the UAE.

Radicalism of any religion typically has the same roots. Those that are turned to radicalism usually are lower class and undereducated. It's across the board. Group identity is usually strongest in that segment of the population. So it really isn't surprising that we see terrorists fit this description.

Let's be critical of the structures that create inequality and allow radicalism to breed. Let's not overly generalize entire groups.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-10-2010, 10:27 AM
 
Location: OKC
5,421 posts, read 6,506,441 times
Reputation: 1775
Mooseketeer;

Thanks for your response. While I can agree with much of what you say, in the interest of time I'm only going to point out the parts I disagree with.

First, I disagree that Islam is not the problem, or at least not A problem. Muslims who may otherwise be wonderful human beings say and believe the most dangerous things because of Islam.

Islam is a product of it's day, and it carries with it all the prejudices and bigotry of it's time. To the extent Muslims try to practice it in it's original unadultrated form, they will be adopting the mores of the 6th century Bedouins. "Real" Islam isn't progressive or liberal or enlightened. It is regressive.

Second, Your defense of Islam can't be based entirely in reference to Christianity - not if you're talking to another atheist. Saying Christianity is backward in no way makes Islam enlightened.

Third, Even if you and I don't particularly agree with the redneck baptist preachers reasoning, we should defend his right to criticize a religion. We should do so because we would want people to defend our right to criticize religion, even if it's considered in poor taste or sacrilegious.

If the baptist preacher can't safely slander Islam, than how can the "pi$$ Christ" artist safely slander Christianity? How can the Dutch artist safely caricature Mohammad? We can't just protect those we like, the principle of freedom of expression is what needs to be protected.

Some suggest we should not criticize Islam because it will lead to irrational violence. What I am saying is that if Islam uses irrational violence to quash dissent, that's all the more reason to criticize it.

Anyway, thanks for you thoughts.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-10-2010, 10:40 AM
 
Location: Maryland about 20 miles NW of DC
6,104 posts, read 5,993,815 times
Reputation: 2479
Quote:
Originally Posted by malamute View Post
Islam does not mean peace, it means submission and it's goal is to have the entire world submit to it.


Islam means submission to the one true GOD and his laws as revealed to holy men throughout the history of humanity. Submission is necessary because man by his nature is in rebellion against GOD. Muslims believe that man who fell from grace (Muslims believe in the Tree of knowledge and the banishment of Adam from the Garden of Eden) must learn and keep GODs law (Muslims have the same 10 Comandments given to the same prophet Moses) to have any chance to surviving GODs final judgement. One thing that Muslims don't believe that you get a pass on the judgement if you believe in Christ but do not accept or practice his teachings. However, Muslims believe that Jesus teachings are the revealed word of GOD and to be followed just like those of Mohammed who came 6 centuries later.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-10-2010, 10:48 AM
 
Location: North Cackelacky....in the hills.
19,567 posts, read 21,878,379 times
Reputation: 2519
Muslims also believe in forced conversion...

And killing of infidels.

And various other things most normal people frown on.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-10-2010, 11:35 AM
 
13,651 posts, read 20,786,272 times
Reputation: 7653
Is it possible to drum out the 6 million Muslims in the USA?

Neither possible nor desireable.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-10-2010, 11:38 AM
 
Location: North Cackelacky....in the hills.
19,567 posts, read 21,878,379 times
Reputation: 2519
Quote:
Originally Posted by Moth View Post
Is it possible to drum out the 6 million Muslims in the USA?

Neither possible nor desireable.
Not to give any credence to the idea,but getting rid of 6 million people is very possible,either through deporting or through other means.

Again not endorsing this idea.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-10-2010, 11:46 AM
 
Location: Texas State Fair
8,560 posts, read 11,218,878 times
Reputation: 4258
Is it possible to drum out the 6 million Muslims in the USA?

I wouldn't want to criticize you for the sentiment since we all have both inalienable as well as constitutional rights. But I don't think drumming out anybody is going to solve any issue. Muslims, by and large, are peaceful and can exist in the U.S. as equally as any other body of humans. There may be a problem with some radical Muslims just as there are with radical Christians, Communists, Nazi's, yada, yada, yada....

The real problem is the introduction of political systems related to those beliefs which varying sects hold dear. Mormons and multiple marriage. Nazi and ovens. Communists and gulags. Islam and Shari'a.

Rather than drum out any group for its religious/political/cultural systems, it might be easier to limit the progressive re-design of the U.S. Constitution.

The maintenance of the Constitution to protect the federal republic would naturally exclude those changes that would threaten our Constitutional freedoms and prohibit the inclusion of practices detrimental to the nations properity.

In short... outlaw Shari'a. It would become clear... if you want to practice Shari'a, choose another country. Same with communism, national socialism, progressive socialism.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-10-2010, 11:52 AM
 
Location: Cushing OK
14,539 posts, read 21,268,827 times
Reputation: 16939
Quote:
Originally Posted by malamute View Post
One can be anti-Muslim just like one can be anti-Nazi. It's the ideology that you are against - but they choose to follow it.
Just not how I see it. I guess we'll have to agree to disagree. I'm not anti any religion, thought I don't like some of the tenants of some. But I won't judge individuals based on that standard.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:42 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top