Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Shouldn't you ask those questions to the warmists who claim Mt Kilimenjaro's snow cap was melting? They have been proven wrong, once again. Maybe they should go back and study some more.
For the warmists, anything out of the ordinary, phenomenon they have never seen in their lifetimes is considered a sign of something wrong, when in fact it is just the naturally changing climate.
You see, the Earth's climate has been changing for BILLIONS of years - you didn't know this?
You didn't shoot anything down, just expressed your opinion, which is wrong of course. If you're going to declare something as "truth", mind putting up some evidence?
I would have thought this last one you would know about - the IPCC doomsayers were taken to task over their report about the glaciers....THAT TURNED OUT TO BE COMPLETELY FALSE.
You really should expand your sources so that maybe you could actually "shoot" somebody down.
Sorry, but just saying it is so, doesn't make it so.
I just have to ask: Do you think the world is static? That sea levels, glaciers, sea ice have staying exactly the same over billions of years?
Can I shoot anything else down for you?
sanrene !!! ... On The Money !
Blimey ... What in bloody hail ever happened to the once truly intellectual scientist in the States and Britain who once upon a time actually possessed some genuine 'Smarts" ?
May the Saint's preserve us from these pitiful "Global Warming Puddin Heads" !!! ARRRRRRRRRRRRGH !!!
Shouldn't you ask those questions to the warmists who claim Mt Kilimenjaro's snow cap was melting? They have been proven wrong, once again. Maybe they should go back and study some more.
For the warmists, anything out of the ordinary, phenomenon they have never seen in their lifetimes is considered a sign of something wrong, when in fact it is just the naturally changing climate.
You see, the Earth's climate has been changing for BILLIONS of years - you didn't know this?
No, I'm asking you since you seem convinced that the plurality of the scientific community is wrong. So it implies you have done research to back your claims. I'm essentially giving you a way to back your claims.
No, I'm asking you since you seem convinced that the plurality of the scientific community is wrong. So it implies you have done research to back your claims. I'm essentially giving you a way to back your claims.
Oh please, I've done that and more. Just on this one little issue, the warmists got it wrong...again.
That they have any credibility at all is criminal.
They should be laughed out of the field of real science.
Oh please, I've done that and more. Just on this one little issue, the warmists got it wrong...again.
That they have any credibility at all is criminal.
They should be laughed out of the field of real science.
So you don't have the data to prove the majority of scientists wrong, let alone back your original claim that the snow caps receding is not a result of climate change? Again if you are able to answer those questions, it would make your footing a little more solid.
So you don't have the data to prove the majority of scientists wrong?
Their own predictions prove them wrong, again and again and again.
You didn't address the question: Do you really believe the climate is static, never changing?
If you're really interested in answers to your questions (which you should be asking the warmists for anyway), just go to WUWT, Climate Depot, Climate Audit - they have a treasure trove of articles, data, and predictions gone wrong AND a bunch of stuff on the crumbling of the house of cards built by the AGW cabal.
Oh, they have figured out what the cause was for the snow cap melt. It's in here somewhere.
People who believe an island like Guam could tip over if too many people were on it are absolutely clueless to how islands are formed,
This Rep, did he ever go though school or is he on some powerful mind altering drugs?
haha - I missed that the first time I watched it. Must have been distracted. That Guam thing is hilarious. Not really associated with this topic, but it's scary what people in positions of power can think.
Sanrene is dogmatic and driven by belief. There's really no point in arguing. She's not going to change her mind. She doesn't separate science from politics, so any science that challenges her politics she refutes. People have been doing it since the earth was flat and the sun revolved around it.
Their own predictions prove them wrong, again and again and again.
You didn't address the question: Do you really believe the climate is static, never changing?
If you're really interested in answers to your questions (which you should be asking the warmists for anyway), just go to WUWT, Climate Depot, Climate Audit - they have a treasure trove of articles, data, and predictions gone wrong AND a bunch of stuff on the crumbling of the house of cards built by the AGW cabal.
Oh, they have figured out what the cause was for the snow cap melt. It's in here somewhere.
One statistical point a trend does not make. Thus why I asked those specific questions. Otherwise, you're extrapolating natural fluctuations and stating the micro as macro.
Sanrene is dogmatic and driven by belief. There's really no point in arguing. She's not going to change her mind. She doesn't separate science from politics, so any science that challenges her politics she refutes. People have been doing it since the earth was flat and the sun revolved around it.
Talk about being dogmatic when facts are staring you in the face. Yeah, let us separate science from politics - that is what has been happening for the last two years, as the AGW believers and their hoax falls apart.
Did you read the links in the OP?
Kili's snow cap isn't melting, my dear and the warmists are wrong...again.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.