Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 03-23-2011, 07:19 PM
 
Location: Chicagoland
41,325 posts, read 44,961,908 times
Reputation: 7118

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by calibro1 View Post
So got any of those?
Shouldn't you ask those questions to the warmists who claim Mt Kilimenjaro's snow cap was melting? They have been proven wrong, once again. Maybe they should go back and study some more.

For the warmists, anything out of the ordinary, phenomenon they have never seen in their lifetimes is considered a sign of something wrong, when in fact it is just the naturally changing climate.

You see, the Earth's climate has been changing for BILLIONS of years - you didn't know this?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 03-23-2011, 07:21 PM
 
Location: Way,Way Up On The Old East Coast
2,196 posts, read 1,995,350 times
Reputation: 1089
Default Arrrrrrrrrrrrrrrgh !!!

Quote:
Originally Posted by sanrene View Post
You didn't shoot anything down, just expressed your opinion, which is wrong of course. If you're going to declare something as "truth", mind putting up some evidence?

Now, if you have some corroboration, like this;

Snowfalls are now just a thing of the past - Environment - The Independent



Note the date, note the "scientist" (the cabal @ UEA), note the last three record-breaking snowy winters in the UK.

Arctic To Be Ice Free By The Year 2000 | Real Science



Not so much;

Increase in Arctic ice confounds doomsayers | Mail Online



Arctic ice recovers from the great melt - Times Online



I would have thought this last one you would know about - the IPCC doomsayers were taken to task over their report about the glaciers....THAT TURNED OUT TO BE COMPLETELY FALSE.

Some Himalayan glaciers are advancing rather than melting, study finds - Telegraph



BBC News - UN climate body admits 'mistake' on Himalayan glaciers

UN climate body admits 'mistake' on Himalayan glaciers

What Alarming Sea Level Rise? Observational Data Reveals No Change, Scientist Says - FoxNews.com



Oh, this guy is THE pre-eminent scientist on the subject.

Read more: What Alarming Sea Level Rise? Observational Data Reveals No Change, Scientist Says - FoxNews.com


You really should expand your sources so that maybe you could actually "shoot" somebody down.

Sorry, but just saying it is so, doesn't make it so.

I just have to ask: Do you think the world is static? That sea levels, glaciers, sea ice have staying exactly the same over billions of years?

Can I shoot anything else down for you?
sanrene !!! ... On The Money !

Blimey ... What in bloody hail ever happened to the once truly intellectual scientist in the States and Britain who once upon a time actually possessed some genuine 'Smarts" ?

May the Saint's preserve us from these pitiful "Global Warming Puddin Heads" !!! ARRRRRRRRRRRRGH !!!

Ta / Old Sgt. Lamar

Last edited by L.Funk; 03-23-2011 at 07:30 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-23-2011, 07:24 PM
 
2,208 posts, read 1,836,925 times
Reputation: 495
Quote:
Originally Posted by sanrene View Post
Shouldn't you ask those questions to the warmists who claim Mt Kilimenjaro's snow cap was melting? They have been proven wrong, once again. Maybe they should go back and study some more.

For the warmists, anything out of the ordinary, phenomenon they have never seen in their lifetimes is considered a sign of something wrong, when in fact it is just the naturally changing climate.

You see, the Earth's climate has been changing for BILLIONS of years - you didn't know this?
No, I'm asking you since you seem convinced that the plurality of the scientific community is wrong. So it implies you have done research to back your claims. I'm essentially giving you a way to back your claims.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-23-2011, 07:31 PM
 
Location: Chicagoland
41,325 posts, read 44,961,908 times
Reputation: 7118
Quote:
Originally Posted by calibro1 View Post
No, I'm asking you since you seem convinced that the plurality of the scientific community is wrong. So it implies you have done research to back your claims. I'm essentially giving you a way to back your claims.
Oh please, I've done that and more. Just on this one little issue, the warmists got it wrong...again.

That they have any credibility at all is criminal.

They should be laughed out of the field of real science.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-23-2011, 07:34 PM
 
2,208 posts, read 1,836,925 times
Reputation: 495
Quote:
Originally Posted by sanrene View Post
Oh please, I've done that and more. Just on this one little issue, the warmists got it wrong...again.

That they have any credibility at all is criminal.

They should be laughed out of the field of real science.
So you don't have the data to prove the majority of scientists wrong, let alone back your original claim that the snow caps receding is not a result of climate change? Again if you are able to answer those questions, it would make your footing a little more solid.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-23-2011, 07:36 PM
 
Location: Chicagoland
41,325 posts, read 44,961,908 times
Reputation: 7118
Quote:
Originally Posted by calibro1 View Post
So you don't have the data to prove the majority of scientists wrong?
Their own predictions prove them wrong, again and again and again.

You didn't address the question: Do you really believe the climate is static, never changing?

If you're really interested in answers to your questions (which you should be asking the warmists for anyway), just go to WUWT, Climate Depot, Climate Audit - they have a treasure trove of articles, data, and predictions gone wrong AND a bunch of stuff on the crumbling of the house of cards built by the AGW cabal.

Oh, they have figured out what the cause was for the snow cap melt. It's in here somewhere.

Here's another one;

http://icecap.us/images/uploads/Samp...ilimanjaro.pdf

Um...the snow cap is not receding...get it?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-23-2011, 07:39 PM
 
11,155 posts, read 15,711,259 times
Reputation: 4209
Quote:
Originally Posted by plwhit View Post
People who believe an island like Guam could tip over if too many people were on it are absolutely clueless to how islands are formed,

This Rep, did he ever go though school or is he on some powerful mind altering drugs?
haha - I missed that the first time I watched it. Must have been distracted. That Guam thing is hilarious. Not really associated with this topic, but it's scary what people in positions of power can think.

Sanrene is dogmatic and driven by belief. There's really no point in arguing. She's not going to change her mind. She doesn't separate science from politics, so any science that challenges her politics she refutes. People have been doing it since the earth was flat and the sun revolved around it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-23-2011, 07:48 PM
 
2,208 posts, read 1,836,925 times
Reputation: 495
Quote:
Originally Posted by sanrene View Post
Their own predictions prove them wrong, again and again and again.

You didn't address the question: Do you really believe the climate is static, never changing?

If you're really interested in answers to your questions (which you should be asking the warmists for anyway), just go to WUWT, Climate Depot, Climate Audit - they have a treasure trove of articles, data, and predictions gone wrong AND a bunch of stuff on the crumbling of the house of cards built by the AGW cabal.

Oh, they have figured out what the cause was for the snow cap melt. It's in here somewhere.

Here's another one;

http://icecap.us/images/uploads/Samp...ilimanjaro.pdf

Um...the snow cap is not receding...get it?
One statistical point a trend does not make. Thus why I asked those specific questions. Otherwise, you're extrapolating natural fluctuations and stating the micro as macro.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-23-2011, 07:59 PM
nei nei won $500 in our forum's Most Engaging Poster Contest - Thirteenth Edition (Jan-Feb 2015). 

Over $104,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum and additional contests are planned
 
Location: Western Massachusetts
45,983 posts, read 53,514,859 times
Reputation: 15184
Quote:
Originally Posted by sanrene View Post
Shouldn't you ask those questions to the warmists who claim Mt Kilimenjaro's snow cap was melting? They have been proven wrong, once again.
From one snowstorm?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-23-2011, 08:08 PM
 
Location: Chicagoland
41,325 posts, read 44,961,908 times
Reputation: 7118
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bluefly View Post
Sanrene is dogmatic and driven by belief. There's really no point in arguing. She's not going to change her mind. She doesn't separate science from politics, so any science that challenges her politics she refutes. People have been doing it since the earth was flat and the sun revolved around it.
Talk about being dogmatic when facts are staring you in the face. Yeah, let us separate science from politics - that is what has been happening for the last two years, as the AGW believers and their hoax falls apart.

Did you read the links in the OP?

Kili's snow cap isn't melting, my dear and the warmists are wrong...again.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:44 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top