Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Again, BEFORE the radical elements of the rebels were known and way before obama actually did anything. Remember, he sat and diddled for a while before making the decision to go to war.
And you learned that between 7.30 am and 10.30 pm on Mar 17, 2011. Or, it was only a matter of figuring out that everything you'd been whining about was suddenly delivered and now you had to make a 180. I hope you wouldn't bet your house to deny the latter. It won't get any more stupid that that.
Seriously? The troops were in Tripoli because the US had been invited to re-open the US embassy. There's a Marine detachment guarding the US Embassy in Paris - did the US invade France? You're being flat-out ridiculous now.
What is truly ridiculous is the response from the Left regarding our "kinetic" military action (obama-speak, noninvasion, nonwar) in Libya and the way they USED to view such actions.
By your own logic, your view must have changed over the last 8 years.
And you learned that between 7.30 am and 10.30 pm on Mar 17, 2011. Or, it was only a matter of figuring out that everything you'd been whining about was suddenly delivered and now you had to make a 180. I hope you wouldn't bet your house to deny the latter. It won't get any more stupid that that.
Your posts speak for themselves.
Sorry, but what does the result of OBAMA'S decision(s) have to do with me?
His choices...that he must now deal with, that he swore would never happen.
Sorry, but what does the result of OBAMA'S decision(s) have to do with me?
So you go about posting absurdities without reason? In this case, calling Obama impotent and not tackling Gaddaffi since they are both Muslims, and to appease Iranians (your accusations at 7.30 am on Mar 17, 2011), and when Obama signs up with NATO to take actions against Gaddaffi on Mar 17, you go... OMG, he is dropping bombs and supporting the radicals against poor Gaddaffi (right along the lines of your accusations at 10.30 pm on Mar 17, 2011). Would you like those links again, sanrene?
Coming from someone changing her stance over the range of 15 hours, that's a stinging criticism.
Does not look like this thread is having the results the OP intended, count on a duplicate thread in the near future, it is a common tactic of some here.
Does not look like this thread is having the results the OP intended, count on a duplicate thread in the near future, it is a common tactic of some here.
Never does, and one would expect sanrene to realize that, as it is the norm with her threads.
So you go about posting absurdities without reason? In this case, calling Obama impotent and not tackling Gaddaffi since they are both Muslims, and to appease Iranians (your accusations at 7.30 am on Mar 17, 2011), and when Obama signs up with NATO to take actions against Gaddaffi on Mar 17, you go... OMG, he is dropping bombs and supporting the radicals against poor Gaddaffi (right along the lines of your accusations at 10.30 pm on Mar 17, 2011). Would you like those links again, sanrene?
Again, after we found out who the rebels actually were.....elements of AQ.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dane_in_LA
Coming from someone changing her stance over the range of 15 hours, that's a stinging criticism.
What stance was that? I mean, if you allow obama to change his stance on when and whether to go to war with a nation when national security is not at risk, I'd think piddly stuff like this wouldn't bother you.
But....you never complained about HIS total hypocrisy...so not much leg to stand on here.
The President does not have power under the Constitution to unilaterally authorize a military attack in a situation that does not involve stopping an actual or imminent threat to the nation.
Oh, DO read some of these questions and answers.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Casper in Dallas
Does not look like this thread is having the results the OP intended, count on a duplicate thread in the near future, it is a common tactic of some here.
What would be the intended results? Now remember, I didn't write any of these pieces, just journalists and news outlets coming to the realization that obama's calculations have resulted in the worst possible outcome for the US and Israel.
barack hussein obama - the president who lost a moderate ME by giving it to the most radical segments of islam.
I know you love Obama and everything, but he couldn't stop the Arab Spring.
By the way, you know they are having elections there don't you? What did you expect Obama to do? Please grow a set and tell people what YOU think he should have done.
I know you love Obama and everything, but he couldn't stop the Arab Spring.
By the way, you know they are having elections there don't you? What did you expect Obama to do? Please grow a set and tell people what YOU think he should have done.
He PUSHED the arab spring, especially in Egypt, where he threw a 30 year ally, critical to the WoT, critical to keeping the radical extremists at bay in his country, under the bus.
He should have pushed for mubarak to step down in an orderly fashion, giving a chance for the moderates to gain support, but no, he wanted mubarak gone "yesterday", throwing governance in the country into a vacuum, which allowed the MB and the even more radical sect to come out on top in the elections.
Now we will have a very radical anti-American, anti-Israel regime installed.
The youth/moderates involved in the protest didn't have a chance.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
