Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
You know this for a fact or are you just making it up as you go along?
There is no "unprecedented attack on the church." Since the 1990s, 23 states have required insurance plans to pay for contraceptives and there was no public objection. It only became an issue when the black-guy in the White House wanted to do it. Then, the GOP made it a campaign issue.
Except that the black guy in the White House helped pass that regulation in 2009 to be effective in October of 2011.
So ask yourself why this became an issue in Feb. of 2012 and then get back to us.
I would bet that, this being Monday morning, the remaining advertisers (if any) are sitting around the table in the board room discussing the possible damage of being associated with someone who is so bigoted.
LOL... they're discussing how long till this blows over so they can again advertise on his show. Advertisers had to bow out... it's the politically correct thing to do in order to show the buying public their "sensitivity."
It appears that the - ehm - discreet dating services for non-single people? - have shown interest in advertising. They apparently feel that with Mr. Limbaugh's listeners showing such an interest in ladies of questionable virtue or even negotiable affection, it's a relevant time slot to advertise their services.
It appears that the - ehm - discreet dating services for non-single people? - have shown interest in advertising. They apparently feel that with Mr. Limbaugh's listeners showing such an interest in ladies of questionable virtue or even negotiable affection, it's a relevant time slot to advertise their services.
Seems to me it became an issue when the RC church objected to it -- and rightly so. Others picked it up and ran with it because it IS an issue when the government dictates that a religious institution must pay for or perform procedures that violate their tenets. No matter how you feel about it, let's be fair -- you must agree that the basic issue is government mandating such a thing.
Does the government require that Jehovah's Witness organizations pay coverage for transfusions? The government might deem transfusions helpful -- even necessary -- but does it mandate they be covered for all JW employees?
What happened to separation of church/state? That works both ways, you know.
It appears that the - ehm - discreet dating services for non-single people? - have shown interest in advertising. They apparently feel that with Mr. Limbaugh's listeners showing such an interest in ladies of questionable virtue or even negotiable affection, it's a relevant time slot to advertise their services.
I've said that it should be covered for diagnosed medical conditions. I was referring to routine BC use. This is a strange argument that people are making when they will not distinguish the use for routine nonmedical purposes vs. that of medical conditions/diseases. No one wants to stop people from getting their necessary medical treatments, but the issue is being confused. If this were about having these meds available to treat disorders, yes. But it is not about that, it is about preventative bc being government mandated for purposes of routine contraception and this is what people have a problem with, not the use of them for medical treatment.
How is the insurance carrier going to know if the script was for medical or BC purposes?
Quote:
Originally Posted by sanrene
Here was the question;
Of course, you can't answer it, because the whole kerfluffle is a made up, manufactured story by the Left.
This 30 year old WOMAN enrolled in a Jesuit University and then proceeded to complain about their BC policy.
Again, she can afford $65K a year in tuition but can't afford to pay for her own BC at $9/month?
Hell has frozen over....Maher defends Rush via his twitter page today.
oh and Carbonites stock tanked lol that's what you get for caving to liberal losers emailing you over and over while they sit at home in their underwear
Maher @billmaher
Hate to defend #RushLimbaugh but he apologized, liberals looking bad not accepting. Also hate intimidation by sponsor pullout
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Hey, new advertisers have shown interest!
