Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
It would only be different it you personally believed that sexuality was a choice, and more specifically, a choice that could be made only by homosexuals. This is just not a supportable stance, however.
Mother nature is not wrong in producing our genitals for reproduction & sexuality.
It must really irk you that 99.9999% of female bees ignore the dictates of mother nature and never use their genitals for reproduction.
It must really irk you that 25% of male black swans ignore the dictates of mother nature and never use their genital for reproduction, instead forming lifelong, monogamous male-male parings in which they raise chicks together (which survive twice as often as chicks raised by a mother and father swan as mother nature intended).
Mother nature is not wrong in producing our genitals for reproduction & sexuality.
I was just reading about how the planet has lost lost 30% of its biodiversity in the last 40 years, almost exclusively due to human activity and increasing human population. Tell me, was Mother Nature too dumb to understand that horny humans might just overproduce?
It would only be different it you personally believed that sexuality was a choice, and more specifically, a choice that could be made only by homosexuals. This is just not a supportable stance, however.
Abuse & sexuality is the same?
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.