Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 12-17-2012, 01:06 PM
 
Location: Meggett, SC
11,011 posts, read 11,028,329 times
Reputation: 6192

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Globe199 View Post
But please think about it in practical terms. Someone, presumably a doctor, makes a determination that a patient could go violent. OK, you must *immediately* ship that person off to a padded cell. No second opinions, nothing. Then what happens? Life term? Maybe the family hires a lawyer and sues the imprisoning body, and that patient is released. Who can guarantee he won't flip out and kill someone? None of this makes any damn sense!

It comes back to an actual solution: gun control.
Well, we used to do it and didn't have these mass shooting issues. So, seems history would prove you incorrect.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 12-17-2012, 01:08 PM
 
1,229 posts, read 1,148,043 times
Reputation: 667
Quote:
Originally Posted by Globe199 View Post
But please think about it in practical terms. Someone, presumably a doctor, makes a determination that a patient could go violent. OK, you must *immediately* ship that person off to a padded cell. No second opinions, nothing. Then what happens? Life term? Maybe the family hires a lawyer and sues the imprisoning body, and that patient is released. Who can guarantee he won't flip out and kill someone? None of this makes any damn sense!

It comes back to an actual solution: gun control.
Or at least if you live with that person you can not have guns in that home. If a person who is deemed to be unstable mentally lives with you, even if you can own a gun you can't keep them where this person has any way shape or form access to them. If you want to keep them at a gun shop, or in a safe at a relatives home, but not in your home. If they get ahold of them and you did not comply you can be charged. We have to have consequences, seems like neocons want consequences for every one but them self.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-17-2012, 01:09 PM
 
4,176 posts, read 4,671,879 times
Reputation: 1672
Quote:
Originally Posted by southbel View Post
Well, we used to do it and didn't have these mass shooting issues. So, seems history would prove you incorrect.
FFS, man. Are you now saying that correlation implies causation? We also didn't used to have assault rifles. Jesus.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-17-2012, 01:10 PM
 
1,229 posts, read 1,148,043 times
Reputation: 667
Quote:
Originally Posted by southbel View Post
Well, we used to do it and didn't have these mass shooting issues. So, seems history would prove you incorrect.
America used to lock people up and preform lobotomy's and electro shock on them, they also used to do some mumbo jumbo because they were thought to be possessed. LOL Your argument is the false dichotomy here.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-17-2012, 01:11 PM
 
4,176 posts, read 4,671,879 times
Reputation: 1672
Quote:
Originally Posted by itlltickleurinnerds View Post
America used to lock people up and preform lobotomy's and electro shock on them, they also used to do some mumbo jumbo because they were thought to be possessed. LOL Your argument is the false dichotomy here.
ECT has made a serious comeback, but that's for another day
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-17-2012, 01:11 PM
 
Location: Meggett, SC
11,011 posts, read 11,028,329 times
Reputation: 6192
Quote:
Originally Posted by itlltickleurinnerds View Post
Or at least if you live with that person you can not have guns in that home. If a person who is deemed to be unstable mentally lives with you, even if you can own a gun you can't keep them where this person has any way shape or form access to them. If you want to keep them at a gun shop, or in a safe at a relatives home, but not in your home. If they get ahold of them and you did not comply you can be charged. We have to have consequences, seems like neocons want consequences for every one but them self.
See look, we agree on this point.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-17-2012, 01:12 PM
 
1,229 posts, read 1,148,043 times
Reputation: 667
Quote:
Originally Posted by southbel View Post
See look, we agree on this point.
But Ted Nugent and the NRA will most likely not.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-17-2012, 01:14 PM
 
Location: Tyler, TX
23,861 posts, read 24,119,613 times
Reputation: 15135
Quote:
Originally Posted by itlltickleurinnerds View Post
Just as there is a closed pool thanks to Ronnie Reagan, of automatic weapons, [no new weapons can be put in the system for private ownership, and those weapons that do exist for private ownership have to be sold through a class 3 dealer and you have to submit to an extensive back ground check, and then pay a 200 dollar stamp tax. once you own one you can not sell it at the local seven eleven. It has to be sold the same way you bought it.] This is why there is no to very few crimes committed with legal full auto weapons.

So why not create a new classification of gun. The semi auto pistol and rifle. If you buy or sell one, you have to pay say 50 bucks to the gov. to do a back ground check on you, and then you own that gun and can not sell it no mater what your local laws are at the wal-mart parking lot to god knows who. It has to be transfered each time you sell. Yep its a bit of a *****, and I myself a gun owner to the tune at one time of 150 guns [I am a bit of a collector] have sold guns legally in parking lots, AR and a Cetme[all legally]. But if it stops things like what happened last week a bit of hassle is nothing compared to the life of a 5yo.
Another self-professed gun owner or "2nd Amendment supporter" that wants to effectively outlaw (or make prohibitively expensive/difficult to get) every handgun except single action revolvers.

You people are what's wrong with this country, when it comes to idiotic gun laws.

You do know that you already have to pay for a background check when you buy a gun in most situations, right? It's referred to as the "Brady Tax," and if you were the gun owner/supporter/collector you say you are, you'd know this already.

The government is already backlogged with background checks. Requiring that every semi-auto add to that burden (which I can't stress enough is an outrageously stupid idea) would effectively create a months - or years - long delay.

You guys need to stop with the knee-jerk reactions to occasional and rare events. As I've said multiple times in this forum since Friday, if only 1% of the gun owners in this country went postal and committed atrocities such as Friday's, you would literally have THOUSANDS of these events occurring EVERY SINGLE DAY. Hopefully that provides you with a new perspective, because you - and others like you - clearly need one.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-17-2012, 01:15 PM
 
Location: Meggett, SC
11,011 posts, read 11,028,329 times
Reputation: 6192
Quote:
Originally Posted by Globe199 View Post
FFS, man. Are you now saying that correlation implies causation? We also didn't used to have assault rifles. Jesus.
Define an assault rifle.

Quote:
Originally Posted by itlltickleurinnerds View Post
America used to lock people up and preform lobotomy's and electro shock on them, they also used to do some mumbo jumbo because they were thought to be possessed. LOL Your argument is the false dichotomy here.
Why do you keep avoiding the mental health issue? Yes, I'm a conservative actually advocating for MORE government spending on mental health. My point is that we have tried and tried again with gun control, as evidenced by the myriad of gun control laws. Perhaps we should stop doing the same thing again and again; let's try something that actually has a chance of being effective and makes sense. Let's see. Your proposal punishes the law abiding. My proposal suggests proper healthcare and treatment for mentally ill and if necessary (e.g. deemed a danger to themselves or others), the means to place them into a mental health facility.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-17-2012, 01:22 PM
 
1,229 posts, read 1,148,043 times
Reputation: 667
Quote:
Originally Posted by swagger View Post
Another self-professed gun owner or "2nd Amendment supporter" that wants to effectively outlaw (or make prohibitively expensive/difficult to get) every handgun except single action revolvers.

You people are what's wrong with this country, when it comes to idiotic gun laws.

You do know that you already have to pay for a background check when you buy a gun in most situations, right? It's referred to as the "Brady Tax," and if you were the gun owner/supporter/collector you say you are, you'd know this already.

The government is already backlogged with background checks. Requiring that every semi-auto add to that burden (which I can't stress enough is an outrageously stupid idea) would effectively create a months - or years - long delay.

You guys need to stop with the knee-jerk reactions to occasional and rare events. As I've said multiple times in this forum since Friday, if only 1% of the gun owners in this country went postal and committed atrocities such as Friday's, you would literally have THOUSANDS of these events occurring EVERY SINGLE DAY. Hopefully that provides you with a new perspective, because you - and others like you - clearly need one.
First off, I have never paid a BGC tax, there is no charge from ATF for each check, its a simple phone call, and I have done it at gun shows. I have lived and bought in Michigan, Kansas, Arkansas, Florida and never once paid a tax for a back ground check. Don't know who is rubbing your rubarb but you should at least get dinner before the DS. LOL Every semi auto sold by a dealer new or used is done with a NICs check. So your just wrong, a few more will not block things up. And what if it did? If it stopped one shooting its worth it, a little inconveniences on our part is worth it unless your an uncaring ass. Your states are just wrong. You are clearly mental.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:30 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top