Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 12-19-2012, 07:43 AM
 
Location: Earth
24,620 posts, read 28,292,958 times
Reputation: 11416

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bideshi View Post
Theresa was a liberal, but one of the very rare moral, God fearing ones.
No, she wasn't.

Hitting Bedrock: Mother Teresa and money


Enlightened Catholicism: Reprise Of A Post From 1-6-2010 With A Message For Today

She also withheld palliative medication from the terminally ill.
Pain is the kiss of Jesus my foot.


Letters to the Editor - The Tech
She believed that, regardless of her victims’ religion, suffering would bring them closer to Jesus. There was so much wrong with the “care” she and her ilk provided that there is hardly room to go into detail here — reusing needles, withholding pain medication, etc. Her “hospitals” existed only to maximize suffering and convert people to Christianity. As the poor died in her arms, she would baptize them if they were not already Christians.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 12-19-2012, 07:44 AM
 
1,229 posts, read 1,148,217 times
Reputation: 667
Quote:
Originally Posted by Finn_Jarber View Post
This 50% decrease in murders in US would be a key argument if there had not been any gun control measures, but the truth is that there were gun control measures, the - Clinton gun ban, which expired in 2004. Did that play a part in the reduction, or was the reduction a coincidence?
The Crime bill did not make it any harder to get a semi auto then before it went into law. All the gun company's did was to make alterations to the guns like removing a bayonet lug or putting on a thumb hole stock to get it past the how it looks law. Australia did the ban right if your going to ban something. You can't own a semi auto in that country. The gov. did a buy back program. The crime bill grandfathered in all guns prior to the law taking affect. Since the 1996 Australia gun ban there have been no mass shootings. The proof is in the pudding.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-19-2012, 07:44 AM
 
Location: Itinerant
8,278 posts, read 6,278,490 times
Reputation: 6681
Quote:
Originally Posted by Finn_Jarber View Post
The study used Russia as an example of a country with strict gun laws, but high murder rates. The truth is that in Moscow alone, some 400,000 people legally keep 470,000 weapons.
Do you know what those weapons are...?
effectively shotguns (which are the only real dangerous ones), gas pistols, and revolvers shooting rubber bullets.

That's like comparing a GLOCK to a Taser.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Finn_Jarber View Post
Also, Russia is plagued by corruption and lawlessness, so it makes no sense to compary the US to Russia in a matter like this.
There wasn't a comparison of the US to Russia in the study, it was an examination of Russia, it's murder rates, and it's gun laws and comparisons with near neighbors with varying gun laws and others across Europe. According to many people the US is plagued with corruption and lawlessness (isn't murder by gun a lawless act?).

Quote:
Originally Posted by itlltickleurinnerds View Post
Why can't gun owners say that even if they don't want to ban assault weapons, at the very minimum we should all agree on is that there should be a federal law that mandates all guns transactions go through a licensed FFL dealer and a back ground check is done.
I've said it before to you in two other threads, and I'll now say it again, the FedGov has not place in regulating INTRASTATE commerce. Petition your states representatives to close the "loophole" you want closed that's their job. If you're so averse to this practice then why have you self admitted you've done it without so much as taking down any of the buyers information? Hypocritical much?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-19-2012, 07:45 AM
 
1,229 posts, read 1,148,217 times
Reputation: 667
Quote:
Originally Posted by chielgirl View Post
No, she wasn't.

Hitting Bedrock: Mother Teresa and money


Enlightened Catholicism: Reprise Of A Post From 1-6-2010 With A Message For Today

She also withheld palliative medication from the terminally ill.
Pain is the kiss of Jesus my foot.


Letters to the Editor - The Tech
She believed that, regardless of her victims’ religion, suffering would bring them closer to Jesus. There was so much wrong with the “care” she and her ilk provided that there is hardly room to go into detail here — reusing needles, withholding pain medication, etc. Her “hospitals” existed only to maximize suffering and convert people to Christianity. As the poor died in her arms, she would baptize them if they were not already Christians.
I did not know that. But nothing suprises me about Christians. They are the biggest bunch of nuts on the planet, well all religoin is just bat crap crazy.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-19-2012, 07:48 AM
 
Location: Maryland
18,630 posts, read 19,427,122 times
Reputation: 6462
Quote:
“I don’t need a 25-round clip for effective home defense, and I sure don’t need one for hunting,” Rep. Martin Heinrich (D), a newly elected senator from New Mexico who had “A” ratings from the NRA, told a local newspaper. “That’s just too much killing power. It defies common sense.”
Gun industry recoils from horror - The Washington Post
Unless you all guns, everywhere folks can tell the American people why these type of weapons the Congressman is referring are needed in America. They should banned.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-19-2012, 07:49 AM
 
1,229 posts, read 1,148,217 times
Reputation: 667
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gungnir View Post
Do you know what those weapons are...?
effectively shotguns (which are the only real dangerous ones), gas pistols, and revolvers shooting rubber bullets.

That's like comparing a GLOCK to a Taser.



There wasn't a comparison of the US to Russia in the study, it was an examination of Russia, it's murder rates, and it's gun laws and comparisons with near neighbors with varying gun laws and others across Europe. According to many people the US is plagued with corruption and lawlessness (isn't murder by gun a lawless act?).



I've said it before to you in two other threads, and I'll now say it again, the FedGov has not place in regulating INTRASTATE commerce. Petition your states representatives to close the "loophole" you want closed that's their job. If you're so averse to this practice then why have you self admitted you've done it without so much as taking down any of the buyers information? Hypocritical much?
Totally wrong. The SCOUTS has ruled that even if a gun or Marijuana is not intended to go out of state that the Federal Gov. has the right under the 10th amendment to regulat them. Your argument just will not fly old boy.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-19-2012, 07:53 AM
 
Location: Florida
76,971 posts, read 47,659,569 times
Reputation: 14806
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gungnir View Post
Do you know what those weapons are...?
effectively shotguns (which are the only real dangerous ones), gas pistols, and revolvers shooting rubber bullets.

That's like comparing a GLOCK to a Taser.
No, that is not true. To get a license to purchase a firearm in Russia, you first need to own a gas pistol etc, and then you can purchase a "real" gun.

Quote:
There wasn't a comparison of the US to Russia in the study, it was an examination of Russia, it's murder rates, and it's gun laws and comparisons with near neighbors with varying gun laws and others across Europe. According to many people the US is plagued with corruption and lawlessness (isn't murder by gun a lawless act?).
Rampant lawlessness in Russia means out of control mafia, gangs, and corrupt police force. We do not have such issues in US.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-19-2012, 08:23 AM
 
Location: Itinerant
8,278 posts, read 6,278,490 times
Reputation: 6681
Quote:
Originally Posted by Finn_Jarber View Post
This 50% decrease in murders in US would be a key argument if there had not been any gun control measures, but the truth is that there were gun control measures, the - Clinton gun ban, which expired in 2004. Did that play a part in the reduction, or was the reduction a coincidence?
Ok well if it played a part it's difficult to see...

here's some data from the end

US Homicides/100,000
2000 - 5.5
2001 - 5.6
2002 - 5.6
2003 - 5.7
2004 - 5.5 <--- Expiry of AWB
2005 - 5.6
2006 - 5.7
2007 - 5.6
2008 - 5.4
2009 - 5.0
2010 - 4.8
2011 - 4.7

So there was no bounceback after the AWB expired there was a little noise, but nothing serious

Here's some from the start

1990 - 9.4
1991 - 9.8
1992 - 9.3
1993 - 9.5
1994 - 9.0 <-- Clinton/Brady
1995 - 8.2
1996 - 7.4
1997 - 6.8

it's difficult to tell whether the reduction was due to the bill or not, I'd expect that if it were then there would have been bounceback at the expiry, but this has not been shown to be the case, indeed we're down almost a full point from nothing in around 8 years (5.5 to 4.7)

Here's an interesting graph


If you look at 1990 though to today we look like we were already on a downward slope, although we do appear to be bottoming out there's certainly no obvious inflections at 1994 or 2004 to indicate there was a sudden impact either at the beginning of the ban or the end of the ban which isn't looking too good for it's effectiveness.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-19-2012, 08:29 AM
 
4,534 posts, read 4,932,712 times
Reputation: 6327
You can't have a loose patchwork of gun laws that are all different across different states, and little federal regulations and say "HA! See gun control doesn't work!"
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-19-2012, 08:33 AM
 
Location: Florida
76,971 posts, read 47,659,569 times
Reputation: 14806
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gungnir View Post
So there was no bounceback after the AWB expired there was a little noise, but nothing serious

Here's some from the start

1990 - 9.4
1991 - 9.8
1992 - 9.3
1993 - 9.5
1994 - 9.0 <-- Clinton/Brady
1995 - 8.2
1996 - 7.4
1997 - 6.8

it's difficult to tell whether the reduction was due to the bill or not, I'd expect that if it were then there would have been bounceback at the expiry, but this has not been shown to be the case, indeed we're down almost a full point from nothing in around 8 years (5.5 to 4.7)
That's what I said. There was a dramatic decrease in murder when the ban went into effect, but there may have been other factors. And when the ban expired in 2004, the violence did not jump back to where it was before the ban. Will it go back in near future? I doubt it, but in FL the numbers are creeping back up. I think in late 1980s and early 1990s the biggest reason for the violent crime explosion was the crack-cocaine epidemic.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:07 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top