Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 01-27-2013, 10:28 AM
 
1,609 posts, read 4,689,860 times
Reputation: 722

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rafo1981 View Post
I don't even consider myself that old, but I can empathize with what you are saying. It seems people, not so long ago, were able to compromise. What happened?
It seems to me the nation is split right down the middle thats not a good thing JMHO
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 01-27-2013, 10:30 AM
 
7,300 posts, read 6,736,448 times
Reputation: 2916
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pretzelogik View Post
“If you're not a liberal at twenty you have no heart, if you're not a conservative at forty you have no brain" Winston Churchill
This is actually an anonymous quote, which has been falsely attributed to Winston Churchill. The fact is, no one ever heard Churchill make this comment. At what point and by whom it was falsely attributed to Churchill is anyone's guess, however, here's a little explanation by Paul Addison of Eddinburgh University that you might like:

"There is no record of anyone hearing Churchill say this. Surely Churchill can't have used the words attributed to him. He'd have been a Conservative at 15 and a Liberal at 35! And would he have talked so disrespectfully of Clemmie, who is generally thought to have been a lifelong Liberal?"
http://www.winstonchurchill.org/learn/speeches/quotations/quotes-falsely-attributed

But whoever's quote it is, it is employed speciously by right wingers in the U.S. and means little or nothing.

I could come up with an equally significant or insignificant quote as well:

"Anyone who is not a liberal by 35, has not grown past the Freudian oral stage, and is forever stuck in seeking only personal gratification."

And you can quote me on that.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-27-2013, 10:35 AM
 
Location: Unperson Everyman Land
38,644 posts, read 26,393,631 times
Reputation: 12656
Quote:
Originally Posted by Saritaschihuahua View Post
Wow. I must've been living on another planet while all this was going on.

I actually THOUGHT that the Republicans had been digging their heels politically refusing to work with the Democrats on ANYTHING, and preventing anything from being passed or approved that might remotely be good for the country. In fact, I thought they were still doing that.

GEE, I sure as h*ll need to catch up, obviously!

You mean things like Obamacare and the trillion dollar stimulus?

When were officeholders bribed by the leadership to vote in favor of tax increases on the wealthy the way they were to vote for Obamacare?

Still watching the shiny coin?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-27-2013, 10:47 AM
 
7,300 posts, read 6,736,448 times
Reputation: 2916
Quote:
Originally Posted by momonkey View Post
You mean things like Obamacare and the trillion dollar stimulus?

When were officeholders bribed by the leadership to vote in favor of tax increases on the wealthy the way they were to vote for Obamacare?

Still watching the shiny coin?
You mean the right wing nutjobs didn't litigate it all the way to the Supremes? Don't tell me the right wing nutjobs haven't been working hard against anything Democrats wanted to do?

As for the trillion dollar stimulus, go talk to your right wing nutjobs, whose most lucrative contributors happen to be.... tatata taaaaaaaaaaaaa! BANKS! So that wasn't a Democratic incentive. That was Repugs not wanting their election funds to dry up.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-27-2013, 11:16 AM
 
73,048 posts, read 62,657,702 times
Reputation: 21942
Quote:
Originally Posted by HoodsofATL View Post
Honestly at the core its Old vs Young that's dividing the country and then its race, and sexuality comes in third but they all bounce back to old vs young.
Which shows we have always been a divided nation from day one.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:39 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top