Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Closed Thread Start New Thread
 
Old 05-18-2013, 07:14 PM
 
Location: So Cal
10,033 posts, read 9,513,888 times
Reputation: 10456

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Iamme73 View Post
This is flat out wrong. The law is specifically written that the police can ask you at anytime they suspect you might be here illegally.

So if you are walking down the street, in Arizona if a police officer suspects you are here illegally the Arizona law gives him the authority to come up to you stop and say papers please, prove you are here legally.


The Arizona Act additionally made it a state misdemeanor crime for an alien to be in Arizona without carrying the required documents, required that state law enforcement officers attempt to determine an individual's immigration status during a "lawful stop, detention or arrest", or during a "lawful contact" not specific to any activity when there is reasonable suspicion that the individual is an illegal immigrant.
Actually "lawful contact" was removed, so no you cannot be stopped soley for the fact of asking your legal status.

"Arizona doesn’t clearly define a Lawful Contact but the revised version of SB 1070 has removed this wording.

The original law stated police can conduct an immigration status check during any quote “lawful contact,” if they have reasonable suspicion a person is an illegal immigrant.
It replaces “lawful contact” with “lawful stop, detention or arrest,” clarifying police may not stop people without cause."

 
Old 05-18-2013, 07:16 PM
 
500 posts, read 376,213 times
Reputation: 212
Someone is hallucinating and feeling all victimized. Poor boy.

Of course patriots and tea partiers now have solid proof they've been targeted. I doubt you'll see any of them belly aching on forums.
 
Old 05-19-2013, 03:21 PM
 
79,907 posts, read 44,241,574 times
Reputation: 17209
Quote:
Originally Posted by pknopp View Post
Don? Question post #50.
I'd still like an answer here.
 
Old 05-19-2013, 03:54 PM
 
62,993 posts, read 29,178,555 times
Reputation: 18604
Quote:
Originally Posted by VLWH View Post
Actually "lawful contact" was removed, so no you cannot be stopped soley for the fact of asking your legal status.

"Arizona doesn’t clearly define a Lawful Contact but the revised version of SB 1070 has removed this wording.

The original law stated police can conduct an immigration status check during any quote “lawful contact,” if they have reasonable suspicion a person is an illegal immigrant.
It replaces “lawful contact” with “lawful stop, detention or arrest,” clarifying police may not stop people without cause."
She'll just continue to spout the ole ethnocentric lies anyway.
 
Old 05-22-2013, 05:26 AM
 
79,907 posts, read 44,241,574 times
Reputation: 17209
Quote:
Originally Posted by pknopp View Post
I'd still like an answer here.
Still waiting Don.
 
Old 05-27-2013, 11:09 AM
 
79,907 posts, read 44,241,574 times
Reputation: 17209
Still waiting.
 
Old 05-27-2013, 11:55 AM
 
Location: US
3,091 posts, read 3,969,227 times
Reputation: 1648
Just so we'll know we are on a level playing field, what do you think is Arizona's immigration problem and what are the immigration laws. Just in general terms is fine. In other words, what is Arizona dealing with with regard to illegal immigrants.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Don Draper View Post
Conservatives were upset that parts of the Arizona law were struck down.

Many right wingers have no problem with the government targeting innocent minorities.
 
Old 05-27-2013, 02:24 PM
 
62,993 posts, read 29,178,555 times
Reputation: 18604
Quote:
Originally Posted by Don Draper View Post
They seem to support profiling when it's against minorities.

Please explain, seems to be a double standard. Profiling is ok when it's non Whites but wrong when it's Whites conservatives?
What profiling are you referring to? Why mention white conservatives only?
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Closed Thread


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:32 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top