Why do feminist principles only count with non-dateable guys?

[NVplumber]

Originally Posted by ovcatto

Now those are some damn fine credentials for providing critiques on feminism as a philosophy and political movement to say nothing of the psycho-bio-socio-anthropologic nature of the relationships between men and women.

...and he accuses others of being full of themselves.

What? You like to read stuff in after cberry picking. Can't you quote and attempt to refute a WHOLE post? And actually keep things in context? Sheesh. "Socio biologicic anthropologic" blah blah blah. Feminism, just like chauvanism, fails to recovnize the NEED men and women have for each otber. Tbat is as analytic as one need get.

If you want to get a scuffle going on tbis issue, QUOTE THE WHOLE THING NEXT TIME. gawwwwwd that crap is annoying! You can't make an argument when things are actually in context. You have to re arrange things to suit. You do it all the time, and Im calling you on it. Its a moronic tactic, and skews everything to a point there is zero room to discuss anything, since you have veered a statement away from its supporting statements, or subject, in this case, to make it say what you WANT it to say. Is this how liberals debate and discuss? Seems so. Good grief!!! You can't really be serious?

[West of Encino]

Originally Posted by Vic 2.0

feminism - definition of feminism by the Free Online Dictionary, Thesaurus and Encyclopedia.

We've been letting man-hating "feminazis" don the label for too long. It's got everyone believing the lie that they are in fact feminists. Feminism is not a bad word!



So you are in favor of giving these rabble-rousers whatever empowering label they want you to use in describing them? Wouldn't that hurt our (the true feminists) cause? "Liar" needs to become the common term for people who claim to be feminists yet attack or are unnecessarily hostile towards men specifically. I will not perpetuate the lie you seem to be fighting for.

You can also thank the government (run by self-hating males) for allowing female supremacy to exist and plague society. Male politicians and lawmakers are more misandric than female supremacists themselves.

[rw47]

Originally Posted by NVplumber

What? You like to read stuff in after cberry picking. Can't you quote and attempt to refute a WHOLE post? And actually keep things in context? Sheesh. "Socio biologicic anthropologic" blah blah blah. Feminism, just like chauvanism, fails to recovnize the NEED men and women have for each otber. Tbat is as analytic as one need get.

If you want to get a scuffle going on tbis issue, QUOTE THE WHOLE THING NEXT TIME. gawwwwwd that crap is annoying! You can't make an argument when things are actually in context. You have to re arrange things to suit. You do it all the time, and Im calling you on it. Its a moronic tactic, and skews everything to a point there is zero room to discuss anything, since you have veered a statement away from its supporting statements, or subject, in this case, to make it say what you WANT it to say. Is this how liberals debate and discuss? Seems so. Good grief!!! You can't really be serious?

Don't bother, this is just crappy debate tactic and he/she knows it. Blab on, insult your opponents, question their credibility, but whatever you do, do not say anything meaningful because god forbid it might lead to an actual discussion.

I've been waiting on a clarification for the completely random insult that was tossed at me about 5 pages ago.

And I'm still laughing at the prospect that you have be an expert in human biology to comment on a social/cultural issue.