Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Trayvon was on the phone with Rachel Jeantel and this lines up with the phone records and time frames. Which makes Zimmermans story about Martin jumping out of bushes so much hogwash.
He also claimed that there was no address visible and there was.
He stated that he had no knowledge of SYG laws and he did.
He admitted that he was following TM and then changed his story.
He proved his capacity for lying right from the jump when he and wifey attempted to hide what they were doing with the defense fund donations.
Much of that is completely irrelevant to the issue at hand: Who initiated the physical altercation? So far all of the evidence points to Trayvon's having initiated it.
Do you have proof Zimmerman did anything wrong? because the state sure does not, they could probably use the help.
Neither party did anything against the law up to the point of physical contact; there is no evidence who initiated the contact.
"Against the law" and wrong aren't always the same thing. Moral and ethical are not always illegal. I didnt say he broke the law. He should not have chased Trayvon. A strange, undentified man chasing a person would make the average person feel threatened.
Do you have proof Zimmerman did anything wrong? because the state sure does not, they could probably use the help.
Neither party did anything against the law up to the point of physical contact; there is no evidence who initiated the contact.
The fact that you would quote my post and ask me that question and ignore the post I was responding to, which was based on speculation, Zimmerman's statements and the poster's opinion that Trayvon is a thug shows your bias.
By the way, I've said over and over that there is no evidence of who attacked who.
There are plenty of people being dramatic here, not just people you disagree with. It doesn't really matter how you see it or how I see it. We don't know what thd jury will do. I doubt he'll be convicted, but it doesn't mean that I think that what he did was moral and ethical. I dont think Zimmerman planned to kill Trayvon Martin, but I do think there was ill-will and spite. I also believe that his actions made Trayvon Martin feel threatened.
When someone jumps you, breaks your nose, and pounds your head into the ground...it can generate ill-will and spite.
"Against the law" and wrong aren't always the same thing. Moral and ethical are not always illegal. I didnt say he broke the law. He should not have chased Trayvon. A strange, undentified man chasing a person would make the average person feel threatened.
Much of that is completely irrelevant to the issue at hand: Who initiated the physical altercation? So far all of the evidence points to Trayvon's having initiated it.
There is no evidence pointing to Martin or Zimmerman initiating physical contact.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
