Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
No, I'm explaining what the judge said was possible and why she made her decision to disallow the phone stuff.
Just a thought:
I know that there was a man that was being harassed by an employer via text messages. he immediately deleted each message. He never replied to them. When he went for unemployment, he was at loss to prove harassment. His cell carrier was able to retrieve those messages, which went on for months, with the date and time stamps still intact.
If those messages and images are really there why could that not be done in this case.
I know that there was a man that was being harassed by an employer via text messages. he immediately deleted each message. He never replied to them. When he went for unemployment, he was at loss to prove harassment. His cell carrier was able to retrieve those messages, which went on for months, with the date and time stamps still intact.
If those messages and images are really there why could that not be done in this case.
Unless they really don't exist.
It could've been done. But the State didn't do it, they didn't want that known. Defense could've but found out late, due to prosecution with holding
Root: "He did scream for help... I don't know what else he could have done."
He could have fought back. He didn't, because I think he was trying to reach for his gun the whole time. That's what 90 % of concealed carry gun-owners would be doing in that situation IMO.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.