Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
You said you knew how wealthy southerners "feel, behave & talk".
I was simply restated what YOU said.
Did you read the post to which I was responding??? Obviously not. I was answering a question. You are attempting to ridicule me and you are harassing me, so STOP. Read in CONTEXT. Figure it out before making posts that are clearly an attempt at ridicule.
The state used peremptory strikes on potential jurors B76, B86, E6, B12, E6 and B35. Two strikes were restored when the judge upheld the defense challenges of E6 and B76.
Did you read the post to which I was responding??? Obviously not. I was answering a question. You are attempting to ridicule me and you are harassing me, so STOP. Read in CONTEXT. Figure it out before making posts that are clearly an attempt at ridicule.
I wouldn't tell you to Google it, silly! It would be like telling you to Google how to make a peanut butter and jelly sandwich. Some things are just common knowledge.
I also never said that there was info from book agents in the packets.
But you made a big deal about these "media packets", as if that's where this ditz got the lead to the book agent. You may quit insulting my intelligence any time. I watched a lot of the trial too. However, by Saturday night I'd seen enough, figured a verdict would come whenever, and we rented a movie.
Did you read the post to which I was responding??? Obviously not. I was answering a question. You are attempting to ridicule me and you are harassing me, so STOP. Read in CONTEXT. Figure it out before making posts that are clearly an attempt at ridicule.
I found this while looking for a source which said that the State did not use all their peremptory strikes in jury selection of Zimmerman trial.
Interesting analysis of Juror B37's questioning by both attorneys.
"Less than two days after a Florida jury found George Zimmerman not guilty in the death of Trayvon Martin, juror B37, one of the six members of the anonymous panel, signed with a literary agent to shop her book about the trial.
The news comes with a bonus video: juror B37’s entire voir dire captured on film and promoted Monday by Gawker. The process by which counsel on each side of the case interviews prospective jurors is revealing in all kinds of ways and a useful lesson in the strengths and weaknesses of the jury system ...
Start with the general observations already raised in Gawker: B37 consumes no media beyond the Today show—no radio, no Internet news, and no newspapers used for anything but lining her parrot's cage. Perhaps because she does not consume any media, she was under the false belief that there were “riots” after the Martin shooting. She also described the Martin killing as "an unfortunate incident that happened."
"What about the odd moment when B37 called Martin a “boy of color”? White says he wouldn’t read too much into it. “There's a tendency to over-emphasize what we believe to be the right nomenclature. In the context of the whole paragraph, her ’boy of color’ sounded like she was trying to use a dimly remembered correct nomenclature (’of color’ in vogue when I was in college), but not remembering the freight of ’boy.’ ... Sure, you strike people based on really clear examples of nomenclature. As a prosecutor in a hate crime case, I once struck someone who said ’I have no problem with African Americans or whatever you're supposed to call them these days.’ But most people don't live in our terminology-conscious bubble."
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.