Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Clearly, if she has been asking for immunity, she is guilty of something. You dont plead the 5th and ask for immunity if you have nothing to hide, if you arent trying to be a coward and cover your own behind.
And why is it the IRS is getting away with refusing to release all her emails?
Where is Obama? Did he not tell the entire country that he wants to get to the truth? So where is he calling for the release of all information being requested? Where is he calling out Lerner? He doesnt want the truth out, because knows damn well what it is.
I am so fed up with our government. When they arent wasting money, they are pulling crap like this, keeping the truth on various things from getting out to the public. They continually cover up for people, in an effort to not hold people accountable.
And shame on you liberals who are perfectly okay with this. You should not give one damn who is in office right now. You, as AMERICANS, should want to know the truth. You should want accountability. What is to stop them from doing this to you, should corrupt folks on the other side of you aisle get in these positions?
Why the heck did she agree to testify again? What a waste of tax payers money!!!
Your failure to comprehend what I write is, at this point, entirely your problem not mine.
Oh I very well understand the circle you're running around in.. its comical
Quote:
Originally Posted by HistorianDude
Issa needs to offer her immunity if he really wants her to testify. He doesn't really seem all that anxious to make that happen.
Once againm, you fail to comprehend whats being written, this thread is about LERNER and HER need to plead the 5th and ASK for immunity. If you claim Issa needs to guarantee Lerner wont be prosecuted then this means you are ADMITTING there is something to be prosecuted for...
Quote:
Originally Posted by HistorianDude
I know exactly what I'm talking about. My declining to chase your red herring only puts a finer point on that simple truth.
We have all seen you run around and admit that Issa needs to offer Lerner a guarantee there will be no prosecution in regards to crimes that will be admitted to.
Quote:
Originally Posted by HistorianDude
What about her? Is it about her hair color? Is it about her shoes?
No... it's about her testimony in front of Issa's committee.
Or more specifically, her Constitutional right to not testify.
never claimed she didnt have a right to refuse to testify.. Hell, my first response here indicated thats true. please attempt to follow the thread.
If she does not need immunity, why has her lawyer been negotiating for immunity for her for the past 6 months?
Because neither Lerhner nor her lawyer are blithering idiots. And only a blithering idiot wold testify in front of a hostile Congressional committee (especially one run by Issa) without immunity.
Conservatives were targeted to DELAY tax exemption status, liberals were AUDITED AFTER they received their tax exemption status, which is the normal process.
Because neither Lerhner nor her lawyer are blithering idiots. And only a blithering idiot wold testify in front of a hostile Congressional committee (especially one run by Issa) without immunity.
Only someone testifying about crimes, would need immunity.
Oh I very well understand the circle you're running around in.. its comical
And yet, I'm the one cracking jokes while you're the one being all angry and butt hurt.
Quote:
Originally Posted by pghquest
Once againm, you fail to comprehend whats being written, this thread is about LERNER and HER need to plead the 5th and ASK for immunity. If you claim Issa needs to guarantee Lerner wont be prosecuted then this means you are ADMITTING there is something to be prosecuted for...
Don't be stupid. If you want to argue with me, argue with what I say and not the voices in your own head.
And while you're at it, look up "admitting" in the dictionary.
Quote:
Originally Posted by pghquest
We have all seen you run around and admit that Issa needs to offer Lerner a guarantee there will be no prosecution in regards to crimes that will be admitted to.
I've never said anything close. I have said that Issa needs to offer it to get her testimony. This is true regardless of whether or not there was a crime committed by anybody.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
