Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Democrat Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid called the people who have been supporting Cliven Bundy and his family, "Domestic Terrorists" on Thursday.
Just one little problem - he apparently forgot that terrorists are people who attack civilians.
The only people coming close to "terrorism", were the Federal agents who descended on Bundy's ranch to try to take Bundy's cattle and keep him off public land - all without a single court order to be found.
But apparently to Harry Reid, "terrorists" are anybody who opposes a liberal administration.
It is said that England's King George III suffered from similar delusions, focused on American patriots and people who were doing nothing but asking the government to treat them fairly. Come to think of it, has anyone ever seen Harry Reid and King George III in the same room at the same time? How old is Harry Reid, anyway?
That is very true. But after this last election, dare I say, I as a member of the Libertarian Party,
MAY vote for Rand Paul IF he runs. I was so disappointed Johnson did not get more votes, and
when I look back, maybe I should have listened to my son and voted for Romney.
Don't play the lesser of two evil game. I vote with my conscience, not which 2 candidates from the 2 main parties that the media presents to us.
Has anyone here defended Harry for his statements ?
Surely Harry has supporters who believe he speaks the truth.
I agree with you. The normally lock-stepped dim crowd are biting their tongues. Seems like Harry's stench makes it impossible for the pill to reach the mouth.
Don't play the lesser of two evil game. I vote with my conscience, not which 2 candidates from the 2 main parties that the media presents to us.
You and I know they are one in the same and have all the money. Supreme court told em they could have as much as their buds could give em too. Third parties have no shot at all hell they barely let half the guys who run even participate in debates and we know why that is too. Only thing to do...........is......well I can't say it or I will be tagged by they NSA so I will digress.
Just one little problem - he apparently forgot that terrorists are people who attack civilians.
Like oh say.....Bundy's neighbors whom he threatened with a range war? Like those folks?
Or how about the "militia" who brought their children with? Those kids maybe?
I don't think that objection holds water. Heres the one that does:
Terrorists have to actually use force for their objectives. Thats the difference between a terrorist and a person exercising their rights. Not just the threat of force.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
