Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Nearly every time a gun is used, it's a celebration of the Second Amendment by someone who loves his gun.
See, that's weird. Shooting is a fun challenge and hunting has its merits, and I can understand having one around for the sake of protection too. But what our eager colleague here is describing sounds more like sex.
See, that's weird. Shooting is a fun challenge and hunting has its merits, and I can understand having one around for the sake of protection too. But what our eager colleague here is describing sounds more like sex.
Anti-constitution liberal gun grabbers have an unhealthy obsession with associating guns with sex.
just remember, if you die, we will never speak to you again for the rest of our lives.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Seabass Inna Bun
See, that's weird. Shooting is a fun challenge and hunting has its merits, and I can understand having one around for the sake of protection too. But what our eager colleague here is describing sounds more like sex.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Harrier
Anti-constitution liberal gun grabbers have an unhealthy obsession with associating guns with sex.
coming from a state that in 1984 had a bio terrorist attack, it's surprising. guns are the least effective way of killing people. throw some rat poison in the salad bar if you want to hurt people. the same liberal idiots that condemn guns, won't condemn their hollywood heroes that produce incredibly violent movies and games. it must be the guns, not the people selling the violence. it's like liberals have never heard of marketing. it's like blaming foot locker, or nike, if someone dude does a 360 dunk on you and jams your face in his nuts.
Ironic ain't? With all of the special effects today, Hollywood has taken violence in movies to a new level. Now don't get me wrong, I love a good action film, but those in Hollywood who preach about gun control shouldn't partake in the making of violent films, now should they?
He has used firearms recreationally, however those were rented or otherwise supplied (all according to applicable law and in controlled environments).
He is a law abiding citizen, and a future responsible gun owner.
Usually when liberals try to link pro constitution people with the crazies who commit these tragic shootings, they do it less directly, but you went straight for the jugular and essentially equated Harrier (a self admitted non-gun owner) with Adam Lanza, simply because Harrier supports and defends the constitution.
Can you liberals be anymore transparent and shallow?
Not anywhere in my post, Harrier, not anywhere in my post.
Look, you said that if it's not in the Constitution that people should be free to live their lives without fear of some gun nut blowing them away, it's not a right.
That's one of the silliest things you've ever said -- which is saying something.
You can pretend it's because you're such a freedom-loving Constitutionalist, but one, you'll never convince sane Americans that living with guns around every corner and in every public place is what the Founders had in mind, and two, you're deflecting because you're embarrassed by your ridiculous post.
Not anywhere in my post, Harrier, not anywhere in my post.
Look, you said that if it's not in the Constitution that people should be free to live their lives without fear of some gun nut blowing them away, it's not a right.
That's one of the silliest things you've ever said -- which is saying something.
You can pretend it's because you're such a freedom-loving Constitutionalist, but one, you'll never convince sane Americans that living with guns around every corner and in every public place is what the Founders had in mind, and two, you're deflecting because you're embarrassed by your ridiculous post.
Out of curiosity, what do you think the firearms ownership rate (per capita) was in 1776? Do you think it was higher or lower than it is now?
so background checks, licensing, and tracking of guns is going to magically end gun violence? is that what you are suggesting?
you almost made me laugh with this post. the fact is that pencils are dangerous weapons when used in a certain manner, you are just too blind to see it. and the idea that somehow, as a pointed out before, licensing, and background checks, and tracking of guns is not going to magically end gun violence. all it will do is stop some law abiding citizens from owning guns.
because those 90 people in detroit are not cute cuddly white rich kids, so the media doesnt care about them.
center right party in power? who would that be? it certainly is not the democrats(who in fact ARE in power now), and most of the republicans are barely on the right these days also.
the problem with liberalism is that they are the ones that have cheapened life through pushing for easy abortions on demand. and ever since gun violence has been on the increase. liberals have pushed policies of cheap life, and then get outraged when someone goes out and proves their efforts to be successful.
And who said tracking guns would "end" gun violence? Do you think you are clever because you can argue against a simplistic strawman?
Out of curiosity, what do you think the firearms ownership rate (per capita) was in 1776? Do you think it was higher or lower than it is now?
Higher because people needed to hunt for food.
That is no longer the case, nor could the founders have known that 200+ years later, morons would be pretending to be patriotic constitution-lovers in order to defend their sick obsession with guns they only play with.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
With all of the special effects today, Hollywood has taken violence in movies to a new level. Now don't get me wrong, I love a good action film, but those in Hollywood who preach about gun control shouldn't partake in the making of violent films, now should they?
