If It Weren't For Liberalism, Today America Would Have Safe, Functioning Nuclear Power Plants Instead of Fossil Fuels (Harry Reid, Congress)
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Why were you so concerned about the alleged plants being planned in 2009 that you felt the need to give cryptic warnings? Might it have something to do with the new liberal in the White House? If McCain had won, the same planning would take place and you probably wouldn't have said a word. That makes you a pathetic hypocrite that nobody should take seriously and should exit this thread.
Blah blah blah. More nothingness from the know-nothing crowd.
Why don't you admit you had absolutely no clue that liberalism was the reason nuclear energy lost its momentum in the USA until you Googled it and started deflecting? Because it's obvious that's what's going on here.
Liberals are starting to eat crow. The problem is, you can't eat crow if you never screwed up to begin with. Liberals are beginning to admit they screwed up bad.
The youngsters on this forum have no clue that it is their ideology that created 40 years of intransigence.
Grab a history book. That's the best advice I can offer you at this juncture.
A science class would probably be good for you as well.
But feel free to tell us more about how wonderful you think nuclear power is. And while you are at it, maybe you can tell us what we should do with nuclear waste.
Grab a history book. That's the best advice I can offer you at this juncture.
Why do you continue to deflect from your contradictory statement four years ago? You seemed very concerned that Obama was secretly planning the construction of new power plants and now you are here blathering on about how all liberals are to blame that there are no new power plants. You cant have it both ways, so which is your true opinion? You are a skilled contorsionist, otherwise known as a hypocrite
Why do you continue to deflect from your contradictory statement four years ago? You seemed very concerned that Obama was secretly planning the construction of new power plants and now you are here blathering on about how all liberals are to blame that there are no new power plants. You cant have it both ways, so which is your true opinion? You are a skilled contorsionist, otherwise known as a hypocrite
Why don't you post my "contradictory post from 4 years ago" if you think it is so damning. I will be more than happy to defend it. Go for it. I'll wait.
Just like the title of the thread states: If it weren't for liberals and liberalism, America would have a vast and expansive nuclear power infrastructure, renewable for infinity, more efficient than fossil fuels, less damaging to the environment than scavenging for coal, oil and natural gas, and more economically efficient than high-cost wind and solar farms.
Top 5 reasons why intelligent liberals don't like nuclear energy.
1)Ignorance
2)Bad pshchological connections
3)Waste
4)Those damn Republicans
5)Fear of the unknown
Here's another reason that you have obviously failed to consider. The problem is not liberals, but NIMBYs. What do you do with spent nuclear fuel? Nobody wants it in their backyard. Not even conservatives.
Here's another reason that you have obviously failed to consider. The problem is not liberals, but NIMBYs. What do you do with spent nuclear fuel? Nobody wants it in their backyard. Not even conservatives.
All that underground testing created all those underground caves.
Load it all into the caves.
Go deep!
Go to the mantel!
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.