Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 07-28-2014, 07:38 AM
 
69,368 posts, read 64,135,461 times
Reputation: 9383

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by triple8s View Post
Doesn't the landlord have to agree to accept vouchers? Landlords that agree to accept vouchers know that the rent is guaranteed every month. If a working tenant moves out he can notify the agency that there is an apartment available and someone getting a voucher will get the apartment.
Are you telling me its the landlors fault for accepting payment for his apartment?

As a landlord, I find this view utterly ridiculous. The issue isnt that the landlord is accepting welfare payments, the issue is that welfare payments shouldnt be so ridiculously high, that they can afford to live in luxury.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 07-28-2014, 07:58 AM
 
Location: the very edge of the continent
89,059 posts, read 44,866,510 times
Reputation: 13718
Quote:
Originally Posted by pghquest View Post
Are you telling me its the landlors fault for accepting payment for his apartment?

As a landlord, I find this view utterly ridiculous. The issue isnt that the landlord is accepting welfare payments, the issue is that welfare payments shouldnt be so ridiculously high, that they can afford to live in luxury.
Especially when there are still over 15,000 waiting for public assistance housing.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-28-2014, 07:59 AM
 
69,368 posts, read 64,135,461 times
Reputation: 9383
Quote:
Originally Posted by InformedConsent View Post
Especially when there are still over 15,000 waiting for public assistance housing.
I dont know if that really matters because even if no one was on the waiting list, paying luxury rates for welfare housing is ridiculous.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-28-2014, 08:00 AM
 
Location: the very edge of the continent
89,059 posts, read 44,866,510 times
Reputation: 13718
Quote:
Originally Posted by pghquest View Post
I dont know if that really matters because even if no one was on the waiting list, paying luxury rates for welfare housing is ridiculous.
True.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-28-2014, 08:02 AM
 
3,971 posts, read 4,042,534 times
Reputation: 5402
Quote:
Originally Posted by InformedConsent View Post
I'm just blown away by the $3,000/month public assistance apartments for 4 people when over 15,000 are still waiting for housing.
This is insanity.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-28-2014, 08:10 AM
 
8,016 posts, read 5,863,789 times
Reputation: 9682
Quote:
Originally Posted by ebbe View Post
This is insanity.
This is, but this is also Chicago, the city that spawned Barack Obama.

Nothing about Chicago surprises me. In fact, I would be surprised if this kind of thing DIDN'T happen in Chicago.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-28-2014, 08:13 AM
 
11,086 posts, read 8,549,057 times
Reputation: 6392
Chicago will be the next Detroit.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-28-2014, 08:28 AM
 
Location: Barrington
63,919 posts, read 46,765,593 times
Reputation: 20674
Quote:
Originally Posted by triple8s View Post
Doesn't the landlord have to agree to accept vouchers? Landlords that agree to accept vouchers know that the rent is guaranteed every month. If a working tenant moves out he can notify the agency that there is an apartment available and someone getting a voucher will get the apartment.
Landlords in Chicago have been required to accept vouchers from qualified applicants for more than 20 years.

Reportedly about 20 other cities have similar mandates as does the entire state of Ma.

Crains Chicago broke the news about 500 LSD, a luxury apartment complex. Crains is now on a quest to learn who recieved the super vouchers and if they are politically connected. There is speculation that the recipients may be disabled and require accessable housing.

The building is owned in part by the AFL-CIO Investment Trust. This is one of many labor associations that is determined to prevent Rahm from winning a second term because he supports charter schools, closed non performing, low attendance schools and fired teachers.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-28-2014, 08:50 AM
 
1,701 posts, read 1,108,971 times
Reputation: 711
Quote:
Originally Posted by pghquest View Post
Are you telling me its the landlors fault for accepting payment for his apartment?

As a landlord, I find this view utterly ridiculous. The issue isnt that the landlord is accepting welfare payments, the issue is that welfare payments shouldnt be so ridiculously high, that they can afford to live in luxury.
Your "view" is nothing more than your opinion. As a landlord I'm sure you wouldn't mind getting a few vouchers at $3,000 a pop.

Do you think every state operates the same? Landlords in NY do not have to accept vouchers, it is at their discretion to do so.

99% of the time people interested in an apartment are required to fill out a form which includes source of income, a couple of pay stubs and landlords run credit checks. To some landlords it's a blessing to get a voucher, to others it isn't. A landlord can turn down someone based on poor credit and low income and usually will tell the applicant that the apartment was rented. It's when someone has a good credit rating, a healthy income and gets turned down because of race/religion/ethnicity, that a case can be brought.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-28-2014, 09:14 AM
 
Location: Maryland
18,630 posts, read 19,427,122 times
Reputation: 6462
Quote:
Originally Posted by middle-aged mom View Post
Landlords in Chicago have been required to accept vouchers from qualified applicants for more than 20 years.

Reportedly about 20 other cities have similar mandates as does the entire state of Ma.

Crains Chicago broke the news about 500 LSD, a luxury apartment complex. Crains is now on a quest to learn who recieved the super vouchers and if they are politically connected. There is speculation that the recipients may be disabled and require accessable housing.

The building is owned in part by the AFL-CIO Investment Trust. This is one of many labor associations that is determined to prevent Rahm from winning a second term because he supports charter schools, closed non performing, low attendance schools and fired teachers.
I was just thinking that, being Chicago I wouldn't be surprised if many of these residents are politically connected, community activist types.

Time for some investigative journalism.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:05 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top