Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
I'm sad to see you don't understand the difference between permission to and mandate to and completely miss the point that after the 9/11 attacks, focusing on finding/eliminating our attackers would likely have been much ebtter use of our resources than invading/occupying a country that did nothing to us.
Yes, 29 Democrats and 48 Republicans in the Senate voted to give Bush the authority. They are all worthless slime who should be in the Hague for war crimes. What is your point?
I just listened to it...give me the time frame based on the length of the youtube video to listen to.....it's only a few seconds over 2 minutes.....I want to be absolutely sure I know the EXACT words you speak of to show he ie in no doubt talking about NUCLEAR....
Status:
"everybody getting reported now.."
(set 24 days ago)
Location: Pine Grove,AL
29,560 posts, read 16,548,014 times
Reputation: 6042
Quote:
Originally Posted by chucksnee
I just listened to it...give me the time frame based on the length of the youtube video to listen to.....it's only a few seconds over 2 minutes.....I want to be absolutely sure I know the EXACT words you speak of to show he ie in no doubt talking about NUCLEAR....
The NY Times article says they found the chemical weapons in 2004, correct.
The video in my link is from August of 2006, correct,
President Bush in this video says
Quote:
" The main reason we went into Iraq at the time was because we thought he had Weapons of Mass destruction, turns out he didnt "
So either he is defining WMD as Nukes.
Or he defined them as Chems,Bio, and Nukes, which would mean he was lying in 2006.
The NY Times article says they found the chemical weapons in 2004, correct.
The video in my link is from August of 2006, correct,
President Bush in this video says
So either he is defining WMD as Nukes.
Or he defined them as Chems,Bio, and Nukes, which would mean he was lying in 2006.
What article, and don't tell me what he says, give me the time frame.....because what you quoted he stated is only part of the entire sentence...(see I did watch the video)
Acting decisively is easy - shoving your wedding tackle in a garbage compactor is a decisive act. How about acting smart?
Obama has been visible checked out on has a Let's See More, approach. In the world of world affairs, any president must be decisive on the information available. Many will forget, or choose to forget the wave of Terrorism was coming from Clinton and exploded on US Shores. The WTT, NY City, 911!
We had the USS Cole, Cobalt towers , the First Bombing of the WTT.
Like or not and history support President Bush , he made the right decision. Now the road of Freedom and the preservation of peace is not easy. President actually fire Rumsfeld and change direction in Iraq that by the end of the Bush second term there was relative peace.
Bush took on a recession and we as a country enjoyed prosperity, until the housing crisis. Which could be argued that was caused by Senior Democrats. We all know the players. Bush actually worked with Dems and passed Democratic sponsor bills. Ted Kennedy Remember?
Its taken 6 year for Obama to turn the economy what it took Bush by the 3 year of his 1st term.
Bush Decisive, very much. Obama weak on leadership and very bad policy.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.