Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Why would I care about bishops responsibilities. They are just men and nothing special.
Because saying Sister NewAge or Father Friendy said so therefore this is the Catholic position is the equivalent of Speaker Pelosi saying the Catholic church supports abortion on command
I've seen fake and confused people who thought they were gay but weren't in my life. But I've never seen a black man who was really white but just confused. So much for your stupid analogy.
Since when did the public majority decide the rights of the minority? The courts were designed to protect the minority so that their rights couldn't be taken away or denied by the majority.
Should we put every right up to a vote to make sure it is what the majority wants? Our country was not designed that way.
Who said there was a right to same sex marriage under our current Constitution?
Nothing in the Constitution gives any court authority to rewrite or nullify any law.
Who said there was a right to same sex marriage under our current Constitution?
Nothing in the Constitution gives any court authority to rewrite or nullify any law.
Yes. That is why the Constitution is amendable.
It was designed exactly that way.
Actually the Constitution doesn't specifically say anything about marriage because it falls under a fundamental right. It does however say we are all treated equally, and denying people the right to marry due to their sexual orientation is not trying people equal, therefore denying them their right.
So that would mean those laws that deny people their rights are in violation of the Constitution and should be removed from law.
Actually the Constitution doesn't specifically say anything about marriage because it falls under a fundamental right. It does however say we are all treated equally, and denying people the right to marry due to their sexual orientation is not trying people equal, therefore denying them their right.
So that would mean those laws that deny people their rights are in violation of the Constitution and should be removed from law.
Equal rights doesn't mean equality in EVERYTHING. If it did then it would not be fair that a select few people get admitted to a school like Westpoint, and other people who do not have the means to be sponsored by a Congress person don't get to attend.
Equal rights doesn't mean equality in EVERYTHING. If it did then it would not be fair that a select few people get admitted to a school like Westpoint, and other people who do not have the means to be sponsored by a Congress person don't get to attend.
That has nothing to do with equal rights. Equal rights and equal representation by the government is not contingent on sexual orientation.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
