Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Yet another weak attempt by the right to bring down their most formidable opponent. Move along, folks, nothing new to see here. But not to worry, there will be another attempt soon, and another. Creating "scandals" against Clinton and then spending years "investigating" them has become SOP for the GOP these days.
Good thing they have nothing more pressing to expend a little bit of energy on.
You don't have to 'create' Clinton scandals. They just keep marching forward in lock step by the Legion.
"Just wanted one device." LIE
"All work emails handed over." LIE
"Never received classified info." LIE
"Never sent classified info." LIE
Something else to keep in mind. Knowing that some emails can be classified after the fact, to send/receive them in the first place from your private server is a horrible decision and poor judgement
Originally Posted by Kibby
General David Petraeus was criminally charged for mishandling Sensitive Documents by the DOJ
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheWiseWino
Charged, tried and convicted by the very same Justice Department that you now claim would... The DOJbe complicit in the cover-up of Clinton's criminal activity as odds are they will refuse to investigate.
Except this is what I really posted - The DOJ is likely to be complicit in the cover-up of Clinton's criminal activity as odds are they will refuse to investigate. If it was "criminal" for General Petraeus, it's criminal for Hillary Clinton .
The operative words here are "likely" & and "odds". Do you agree that the DOJ should investigate the "mishandling of documents" as a criminal charge for Clinton JUST AS THEY DID for Petraeus?
It's not the same US Attorney General, but the "new" AG is still refusing to investigate the IRS and the "new" AG has not issue any statement about the requested criminal investigation into the Clinton mishandling of Sensitive Documents. It won't take long to find out if the "new" IG is the same as the "old" IG. Tick-Tock
Clinton claimed there were no Classified materials - we already know that was wrong.
Clinton claimed there were no Sensitive Documents - the IG of the State Department AND the Intelligence IG both say that is Wrong ...... and they have requested a DOJ Criminal Investigation.
This is not the Mythical Vast Right Wing Conspiracy (Clinton needs a new Play-Book), this is the State and Intelligence Inspector Generals' request.
Hillary has said that she didn't know of any classified information on her private email.
Hillary today on her private server email scandal:
"The American people deserve the truth and I will do my part to make sure Americans get the truth." -Hillary
"We are all accountable to the American people, to get the facts right, and I will do my part" -Hillary
How can anyone believe that, she wiped her server clean and refused to hand it over.
How can she do her part to get the facts right when she wiped her server clean. We don't know what emails she didn't hand over and can't know, because she wiped them clean.
If you believed Hillary and thought her comments were sincere - WAKE UP, USE YOUR BRAIN, YOU ARE A SHEEP!
It's very simple to "Know the truth".
All she has to do is turn over the Private Email Server that she was using in violation of the State Department policy, the paperwork she signed and the Administration's Policy.
She absolutely KNEW she was violating the rules and putting National Security at risk - NOBODY is at fault but Hillary Clinton, who thinks "rules" are not for her.
Turn over the Servers and then we will all "Know the Truth"
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.