Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 07-08-2015, 09:42 PM
 
3,786 posts, read 5,332,556 times
Reputation: 6314

Advertisements

U.S. Code, Title 18, Part I, Chapter 101, Section 2071, Paragraph a: “Whoever willfully and unlawfully conceals, removes, mutilates, obliterates, or destroys, or attempts to do so, or, with intent to do so takes and carries away any record, proceeding, map, book, paper, document, or other thing, filed or deposited with any clerk or officer of any court of the United States, or in any public office, or with any judicial or public officer of the United States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both.”

Paragraph b: Whoever, having the custody of any such record, proceeding, map, book, document, paper, or other thing, willfully and unlawfully conceals, removes, mutilates, obliterates, falsifies, or destroys the same, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both; and shall forfeit his office and be disqualified from holding any office under the United States.

It is important to quote this code verbatim.

For four years Hillary used a private server, at her house, to conduct State business. Those emails were not transacted or recorded through official State Department servers which are protected and backed up regularly to protect them from hackers.

She was keeping her State Department emails out of the reach of Freedom of Information Act requests. She willfully and unlawfully concealed, removed, mutilated, obliterated, falsified and destroyed material that was part of official State Department business. For that she needs to go to jail and be disqualified from holding any office under the United States of America.

How are you going to spin that?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 07-08-2015, 09:43 PM
 
69,368 posts, read 64,128,317 times
Reputation: 9383
Quote:
Originally Posted by Versatile View Post
Quit changing it. The question is that. You said she has broken the law. PROVE IT.
What would be the grounds to fire someone if they didnt do anything wrong?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-09-2015, 07:50 AM
 
12,282 posts, read 13,244,094 times
Reputation: 4985
Quote:
Originally Posted by Teak View Post
U.S. Code, Title 18, Part I, Chapter 101, Section 2071, Paragraph a: “Whoever willfully and unlawfully conceals, removes, mutilates, obliterates, or destroys, or attempts to do so, or, with intent to do so takes and carries away any record, proceeding, map, book, paper, document, or other thing, filed or deposited with any clerk or officer of any court of the United States, or in any public office, or with any judicial or public officer of the United States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both.”

Paragraph b: Whoever, having the custody of any such record, proceeding, map, book, document, paper, or other thing, willfully and unlawfully conceals, removes, mutilates, obliterates, falsifies, or destroys the same, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both; and shall forfeit his office and be disqualified from holding any office under the United States.

It is important to quote this code verbatim.

For four years Hillary used a private server, at her house, to conduct State business. Those emails were not transacted or recorded through official State Department servers which are protected and backed up regularly to protect them from hackers.

She was keeping her State Department emails out of the reach of Freedom of Information Act requests. She willfully and unlawfully concealed, removed, mutilated, obliterated, falsified and destroyed material that was part of official State Department business. For that she needs to go to jail and be disqualified from holding any office under the United States of America.

How are you going to spin that?
I don't pretend to try and understand a written law.I have heard of no charges against her.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-09-2015, 08:05 AM
 
11,755 posts, read 7,120,263 times
Reputation: 8011
Quote:
Originally Posted by pghquest View Post
Oh please.. you guys ran around babbling over a bridge that was shut down, calling to off Christies head because he "should have" known, even though it wasnt illegal and nothing proved he had any thing to do with it...
Well, don't you agree that a closer examination is warranted when one's close associates have plead guilty and been indicted in connection with the Bridgegate, and that one of said associate who agreed to a guilty plea says "there exists evidence that Christie knew about it at the time."

Mick
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-09-2015, 08:09 AM
 
12,282 posts, read 13,244,094 times
Reputation: 4985
Quote:
Originally Posted by MTQ3000 View Post
Well, don't you agree that a closer examination is warranted when one's close associates have plead guilty and been indicted in connection with the Bridgegate, and that one of said associate who agreed to a guilty plea says "there exists evidence that Christie knew about it at the time."

Mick

pghquest doesn't want to hear that. We do though. thanks.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-09-2015, 08:26 AM
 
27,145 posts, read 15,327,118 times
Reputation: 12072
Quote:
Originally Posted by florida.bob View Post
Another phony scandal in the process of unravelling.

You can not possibly be this blind.
This can be nothing but an intentional turn from the truth.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-09-2015, 08:30 AM
 
27,145 posts, read 15,327,118 times
Reputation: 12072
Quote:
Originally Posted by HeyJude514 View Post
Wouldn't it be refreshing to see the GOP turn their attention to the real problems facing the country instead of working so hard to find a scandal on Hillary? It's like they think there is nothing of importance that they could be working on outside of Benghazi and e-mails.


Oh yes of course, no government official should ever be held to accountabilitywith a D after their name in your book.

Although that is your responsibility of this nation.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-09-2015, 10:31 AM
 
69,368 posts, read 64,128,317 times
Reputation: 9383
Quote:
Originally Posted by Versatile View Post
pghquest doesn't want to hear that. We do though. thanks.
liar
Quote:
Originally Posted by MTQ3000 View Post
Well, don't you agree that a closer examination is warranted when one's close associates have plead guilty and been indicted in connection with the Bridgegate, and that one of said associate who agreed to a guilty plea says "there exists evidence that Christie knew about it at the time."

Mick
I didnt at all object to an "examination", but the left did far more than just "examine", while they CRY non stop because the right is "examining" whats going on in Washington.

IRS, Emails, violating subpoenas etc. ALL WRONG...

left response, big deal..

When the LEFT starts to hold themselves to their OWN standards, I'll stop calling them out for the hypocrites that theya re.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-09-2015, 10:32 AM
 
69,368 posts, read 64,128,317 times
Reputation: 9383
Quote:
Originally Posted by bluesjuke View Post
Oh yes of course, no government official should ever be held to accountabilitywith a D after their name in your book.

Although that is your responsibility of this nation.
Exactly.. The left will defend any Democrat no matter what they do.. Its pathetic...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-24-2015, 04:25 AM
 
143 posts, read 96,284 times
Reputation: 242
Default Criminal investigation requested over Clinton's private email account

Will the woman who's every "achievement" in life is based on the fact that she was married to a man who was elected POTUS be electable? Oh Hill no....


Quote:
(CNN)A criminal investigation could be opened in relation to the personal email account that Hillary Clinton used during her time as secretary of state, according to a New York Times report late Thursday.



http://www.cnn.com/2015/07/24/politi...ce-department/
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:37 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top