Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 09-16-2015, 08:24 AM
 
Location: The Silver State (from the UK)
4,664 posts, read 8,243,413 times
Reputation: 2862

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by 3~Shepherds View Post
Let us guess........ you like the 24 Days Notice Deal?

What do you mean exactly? Spell out your understanding of "24 days notice"..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 09-16-2015, 08:42 AM
 
Location: Long Island
57,314 posts, read 26,228,587 times
Reputation: 15648
Quote:
Originally Posted by OICU812 View Post
Please, do tell, how will Obama's agreement prevent Iran from ever, ever, ever getting nuclear weapons. I'll wait.
What agreement will guarantee any country from ever getting nuclear arms.

It's not Obama's agreement by the way.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-16-2015, 08:45 AM
 
Location: Long Island
57,314 posts, read 26,228,587 times
Reputation: 15648
Quote:
Originally Posted by BMoreJuice View Post
Yes. Terrorist activities, Terrorist Financing, Human Rights violations of its own citizens and other abroad, yielding of genocidal threats of the United States and Israel, Prevention of ICBM's production.

Your knowledge of the deal is extremely poor. This deal has not prevented nuclear weapons, but has legitimized it down the road.
There are other sanctions that will remain in place relative to the above.

The deal puts off their ability to become a nuclear power 10-15 years, maybe they change in that time. The alternative of keeping sanctions in place wasn't working and was a dead end.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-16-2015, 12:35 PM
 
Location: The Silver State (from the UK)
4,664 posts, read 8,243,413 times
Reputation: 2862
Quote:
Originally Posted by Goodnight View Post
There are other sanctions that will remain in place relative to the above.

The deal puts off their ability to become a nuclear power 10-15 years, maybe they change in that time. The alternative of keeping sanctions in place wasn't working and was a dead end.


You're totally right. Plus, there is more of a chance that Iran will not be nuclear armed under this agreement than without.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-16-2015, 12:39 PM
 
595 posts, read 368,767 times
Reputation: 210
Quote:
Originally Posted by Goodnight View Post
I think this deal is complicated enough without expanding to the dual Iranian-US Citizens, some real questionable backgrounds. They may have very well attempted to put that in the deal but the focus is nuclear capability. There are other others in place, next up for debate is how to remove sanctions.

I could care less about Israel's recognition, it is unimportant to the US and what exactly does that do for Israel.
Agree, it is a complicated deal considering 7 countries are involved. Guess another deal will be needed regarding the U.S. citizens in Iran.

Wonder how the sanctions removal will go. Think congress will try to derail that?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-16-2015, 12:42 PM
 
79,907 posts, read 44,222,338 times
Reputation: 17209
Quote:
Originally Posted by BMoreJuice View Post
Yes. Terrorist activities, Terrorist Financing, Human Rights violations of its own citizens and other abroad, yielding of genocidal threats of the United States and Israel, Prevention of ICBM's production.

Your knowledge of the deal is extremely poor. This deal has not prevented nuclear weapons, but has legitimized it down the road.
I've asked this many times and I never get an answer. Why should we expect them to be different than us? We've funded the terrorists. We have argued for and have killed American citizens (by targeting them) without due process. We threaten other countries all the time. We are the only country to have actually used a nuclear weapon.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-16-2015, 12:44 PM
 
79,907 posts, read 44,222,338 times
Reputation: 17209
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mag3.14 View Post
Except that you are wrong about Iranians inspecting their own sites. 100% wrong. If that is all you need to know, then I rest my case.
Of course you can't provide any thing of substance to show that this is wrong.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-16-2015, 12:46 PM
 
7,300 posts, read 3,399,266 times
Reputation: 4812
Quote:
Originally Posted by Toyman at Jewel Lake View Post
A deal that calls for "inspections" of Iranian nuclear weapons sites to be inspected only by Iranians? That's about as much as I need to know. Anyone that voted for that deal is a traitor to this country.
How so?

Insofar as Iran threatens anyone at all, it's Israel. We are not the State of Israel and they certainly are not us nor do they care about our well being.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-16-2015, 12:48 PM
 
7,300 posts, read 3,399,266 times
Reputation: 4812
Quote:
Originally Posted by BMoreJuice View Post
All roads once again have lead to Iran's genocidal threats of the Jewish state. Until Iran de-committees from this destruction, we have no business legitimizing its nuclear program.
Playing the part of victim while hording illegal nuclear weapons that play a large part in destabilizing the region is not a legitimate position.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-16-2015, 12:53 PM
 
7,300 posts, read 3,399,266 times
Reputation: 4812
Quote:
Originally Posted by OICU812 View Post
Is the government of Saudi Arabia engaging the public in "death to America" chants, threatening to wipe Israel off the map, while pursuing nuclear weapons and ICBMs, and did they kill or injure hundreds of US service members in Iraq with their bombs (EFPs)??

No?

Hmmmmm..... I guess there must be a double standard going on here.

Your correlations are flat out lies, besides being laughably ridiculous. When did the "government" of Iran engage in "Public Death to America" chants (do you read what you write before you post it?)?

Saudi Arabia is the largest state sponsor of Wahabism that has radicalized Islam across the world. It is more directly responsible for U.S. service member deaths and Islamic terrorism than any other country.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:03 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top