Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Prevents nothing. Enhances Iran getting the bomb. The mad mullahs will do whatever they want regardless of any empty promises from them.
And what is your historical precedent for this opinion in Iran? In other words, what separates your "mad mullahs" spiel from cynical lying propaganda insofar is Iran is concerned?
Of course you can't provide any thing of substance to show that this is wrong.
I didn't provide any links because I shouldn't have to. I will below, but those who make claims like "Iran can self inspect their own sites" are just believing some crap that was put out by the AP (based on an initial draft with regard to Parchin but didn't become of the actual deal) and then retracted.
United Nations inspectors will be present with Iranian technicians as they take samples from a key military site, two Western diplomats said, undercutting an objection by U.S. Republicans to the nuclear deal between Iran and world powers.
Iran has agreed to accept comprehensive International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) inspections of its suspect sites as part of the historic July deal in exchange for an easing of international sanctions.
An August report by the Associated Press, in its original version, said the agreement on Parchin suggested that IAEA inspectors would be barred from the site and would have to rely on information and environmental samples provided by Iranian technicians. The AP later published what it said was the text of an early draft of the agreement that remains unconfirmed.
The report was seized on by Republicans in the U.S. Congress as proof that President Barack Obama's administration gave in to Iran on the sensitive issue of inspections to check on Tehran's suspected ambition to build a nuclear bomb.
So you're OK with Iran's incessant threats to annihilate our friend Israel and with Iran keeping 4 American hostages... right?
Nice of you to throw in with the Mullahs.
Israel is more than capable of taking care of themselves. If anything, Iran is the one who would suffer should they ever be stupid enough to take on Israel.
This deal is between Iran and six other world powers, not Iran and the U.S. alone. We should negotiate for things that fall outside the scope of this agreement separately.
Agree, it is a complicated deal considering 7 countries are involved. Guess another deal will be needed regarding the U.S. citizens in Iran.
Wonder how the sanctions removal will go. Think congress will try to derail that?
Sanctions removal would be difficult enough with a cooperative congress.
Removing the US sanctions on foreign companies and banks doing business with Iran will be the first step. Iran will be blocked from doing business with the US because of their participation in terrorism even after this agreement.
The complications come in with foreign subsidiaries of US companies doing business with other countries that may be connected to Iran.
Congress is already considering stepping up other sanctions that are outside the current deal, I would think that would be a show stopper for Iran at this time.
I didn't provide any links because I shouldn't have to. I will below, but those who make claims like "Iran can self inspect their own sites" are just believing some crap that was put out by the AP (based on an initial draft with regard to Parchin but didn't become of the actual deal) and then retracted.
United Nations inspectors will be present with Iranian technicians as they take samples from a key military site, two Western diplomats said, undercutting an objection by U.S. Republicans to the nuclear deal between Iran and world powers.
Iran has agreed to accept comprehensive International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) inspections of its suspect sites as part of the historic July deal in exchange for an easing of international sanctions.
An August report by the Associated Press, in its original version, said the agreement on Parchin suggested that IAEA inspectors would be barred from the site and would have to rely on information and environmental samples provided by Iranian technicians. The AP later published what it said was the text of an early draft of the agreement that remains unconfirmed.
The report was seized on by Republicans in the U.S. Congress as proof that President Barack Obama's administration gave in to Iran on the sensitive issue of inspections to check on Tehran's suspected ambition to build a nuclear bomb.
Iran isn't going to allow anyone to inspect any sensitive facilities nor should they.
Many understand diplomat speak.
"I am disturbed by statements suggesting that the IAEA has given responsibility for nuclear inspections to Iran. Such statements misrepresent the way in which we will undertake this important verification work," IAEA Director-General Yukiya Amano said in an unusually strongly worded statement on Thursday.
He doesn't say the claims are wrong. he says they are being misrepresented. He also says he is unable to provide any verification for his claims.
So you're OK with Iran's incessant threats to annihilate our friend Israel and with Iran keeping 4 American hostages... right?
Nice of you to throw in with the Mullahs.
You don't hear that from the president just the Ayatollah and some right wingers.
If we got along with them we wouldn't need an agreement, the nations involved in this are not going to back out because of angry rhetoric from some old school right wing nuts.
Sanctions removal would be difficult enough with a cooperative congress.
Removing the US sanctions on foreign companies and banks doing business with Iran will be the first step. Iran will be blocked from doing business with the US because of their participation in terrorism even after this agreement.
The complications come in with foreign subsidiaries of US companies doing business with other countries that may be connected to Iran.
Congress is already considering stepping up other sanctions that are outside the current deal, I would think that would be a show stopper for Iran at this time.
Israel is more than capable of taking care of themselves. If anything, Iran is the one who would suffer should they ever be stupid enough to take on Israel.
This deal is between Iran and six other world powers, not Iran and the U.S. alone. We should negotiate for things that fall outside the scope of this agreement separately.
Yes, Israel is capable of taking care of themselves. That isn't even the point. Their capabilities doesn't mean we should allow them to get the short end of the stick when we are in a position to prevent that.
And there is NO REASON the hostages they are holding could NOT be in the scope of this agreement.
This agreement is utterly without defense.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
