Should Army Traitor Bowe Bergdahl Go To Prison (Congressmen, influence, McCain)

[mickdoo]

He should be promoted and accepted into obamas cabinet for foreign policy adviser.

[steven_h]

Originally Posted by Goodnight

It's his job to threaten intervention even before the verdict, interesting.

YEP! Intervention in a travesty of so-called justice!

[steven_h]

Originally Posted by TigerLily24

It has been noted several times that NO ONE DIED looking for him.

That is the sworn testimony of witnesses FOR THE PROSECUTION at the hearing.

I see your witnesses and raise you a General:
SAN ANTONIO — The general who led the Army investigation into Sgt. Bowe Bergdahl"s disappearance from an Afghan combat outpost in 2009 testified Friday that Bergdahl walked away intentionally in hopes of triggering a search and rescue mission that would reveal "severe" leadership problems in his platoon.

Let's say that nobody died as a result.

Is Bergdahl a deserter? By any definition YES

Would triggering a search for him constitute causing intentional danger to his platoon? YES

Did this administration trade five of the highest value prisoners we had for this deserter? YES

Is it at all likely those five high value leaders will do more damage, wreak more havoc and kill more people? YES


We'll place the deaths of soldiers on the back burner until there is more clarification.

Based on his intent, he deserves what any deserter of his post deserves.

Am I mistaken, or would that be a firing squad?

[TigerLily24]

Originally Posted by steven_h

I see your witnesses and raise you a General:
SAN ANTONIO — The general who led the Army investigation into Sgt. Bowe Bergdahl"s disappearance from an Afghan combat outpost in 2009 testified Friday that Bergdahl walked away intentionally in hopes of triggering a search and rescue mission that would reveal "severe" leadership problems in his platoon.

Let's say that nobody died as a result.

Is Bergdahl a deserter? By any definition YES

Would triggering a search for him constitute causing intentional danger to his platoon? YES

Did this administration trade five of the highest value prisoners we had for this deserter? YES

Is it at all likely those five high value leaders will do more damage, wreak more havoc and kill more people? YES


We'll place the deaths of soldiers on the back burner until there is more clarification.

Based on his intent, he deserves what any deserter of his post deserves.

Am I mistaken, or would that be a firing squad?

If that is the verdict, so be it.

[Arjay51]

Originally Posted by Goodnight

Some where killed doing road security and monitoring elections, what do you have that verifies they were searching.

Again you show abject ignorance. As part of a standing order a missing soldier is part of the mission, looking for him and finding him.

Further proof that you know nothing about what you comment on, even demand the outcome you want unless you decide to take that back.

[Arjay51]

Originally Posted by Goodnight

It's his job to threaten intervention even before the verdict, interesting.

It is his job to intervene before the incorrect verdict is reached.

Are you claiming to be an expert in military law now? Hint, you aren't even close to any knowledge of military law as you have proven time and time again.

[desertdetroiter]

Originally Posted by Arjay51

Perhaps hailing as a victory in the Rose Garden his exchange? Obama making a big deal out of one of his own traitorous decisions based on no facts (as usual).

In point of fact, Obama violated a long standing policy of the US, he dealt with terrorists and not for the last time. That is what he did wrong this time.

What was traitorous about what Obama did and what terrorists did he deal with? Name 'em. You can't.

Number two, the United States has quite an extensive history of dealing with ACTUAL terrorists. Every president since Ike at least has dealt with terrorists. It's what we do despite some bogus longstanding policy.

Sorry to tell you.

[Goodnight]

Originally Posted by steven_h

YEP! Intervention in a travesty of so-called justice!

You're so dishonest I'm done trying to reason with you.

You realize there isn't even a verdict yet.

[MotleyCrew]

He should not go to jail. he should be shot by firing squad...by his peers he left behind. I have no problem with reality...it is those on the left that live in an upside down world.

[chucksnee]

I'm confused here, did berghdal leave his post/company/job? Does the time frame matter? Does what he was going to do matter? All that is after the fact...

He broke military law...like it or not.....again, if the courts want to take that into consideration, fine, let them, in the end he left his post....which is what everyone? All at once now....