Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
NPR piece day before yesterday mentioned this particular Muslim quarter had 35% unemployment which correlates to unrest and then criminal behavior. They alluded to being more susceptible to terrorist activities.
These weren't refugees, these were home grown Belgians going back and forth to Syria. Conservatives want to ban all Muslims or Syrian refugees.
once again you show that you are either just plain WRONG, you have no reading comprehension, or you are lying to try and prove a point. we do not want to ban all muslims, but rather stop them from entering the country until such time as they can be properly vetted.
once again you show that you are either just plain WRONG, you have no reading comprehension, or you are lying to try and prove a point. we do not want to ban all muslims, but rather stop them from entering the country until such time as they can be properly vetted.
What is "proper vetting" are there specific proposals as to what they look like because I have yet to hear a thing. The refugees have already been vetted for years before being allowed to enter but the Visa program is a candidate for improvement. Your the one who brought up refugees.
Tell me whats the difference between stopping a religious group from immigrating versus a ban?
The disussion was ISIS trained cells insiode the US and the 400 number was from documented sources in europe, an investigation, online followers does not equate to thousands of trained terrorists from ISIS.
What is "proper vetting" are there specific proposals as to what they look like because I have yet to hear a thing. The refugees have already been vetted for years before being allowed to enter but the Visa program is a candidate for improvement. Your the one who brought up refugees.
Tell me whats the difference between stopping a religious group from immigrating versus a ban?
its called digging into the background of these people to make sure they are NOT terrorists in disguise. ISIS has said they would in fact send terrorist fighters into the US as refugees fleeing persecution. in other words they are going to use our laws and compassion against us.
The disussion was ISIS trained cells insiode the US and the 400 number was from documented sources in europe, an investigation, online followers does not equate to thousands of trained terrorists from ISIS.
There are 900 that they know of and there are thousands more that they suspect. And if you'd been reading the news you would know that they don't properly vet incoming Muslims or San Bernardino wouldn't have happened. They interviewed the wife three times and missed what she was up to.
You can't be seriously posting about this given the ignorance shown here:
Quote:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Goodnight
What is "proper vetting" are there specific proposals as to what they look like because I have yet to hear a thing. The refugees have already been vetted for years before being allowed to enter but the Visa program is a candidate for improvement. Your the one who brought up refugees.
Tell me whats the difference between stopping a religious group from immigrating versus a ban?
You have yet to "hear a thing"? What, does some agency call you with the scoop?
They haven't been vetted for years. Try and keep up.
once again you show that you are either just plain WRONG, you have no reading comprehension, or you are lying to try and prove a point. we do not want to ban all muslims, but rather stop them from entering the country until such time as they can be properly vetted.
Where are the arrests of family members of the St Bernadino terrorist family members who claimed they were not radicalized? The mom who lived at the same house and can't claim not knowing.
Yesterday a so called former radical islamist said on TV that many times it is entire families who know about it as these terrorist don't trust outsiders so they keep it with brothers, sisters, cousins, parents, etc.
There are 900 that they know of and there are thousands more that they suspect. And if you'd been reading the news you would know that they don't properly vet incoming Muslims or San Bernardino wouldn't have happened. They interviewed the wife three times and missed what she was up to.
You can't be seriously posting about this given the ignorance shown here:
You have yet to "hear a thing"? What, does some agency call you with the scoop?
They haven't been vetted for years. Try and keep up.
Long response but you still have not indicated what needs to be changed in the vetting of refugees, I don't think you are aware of the current process yet you want to stop refugees from coming here.
Long response but you still have not indicated what needs to be changed in the vetting of refugees, I don't think you are aware of the current process yet you want to stop refugees from coming here.
I still have not indicated what needs to be changed? When did that enter the discussion?
Every time you've posted something and it's dispelled, you post some demand in response as though it was part of the discussion in the first place.
Bottom line - it needs to be changed before we allow entry of any additional Muslims. WHAT needs to be changed or HOW it needs to change is not my job.
If someone posted that Elon Musk shouldn't put any people on SpaceX until the problems are resolved, would you argue that they're unaware and need to post specifically what needs to be changed?
You might, but that would make about as much sense as your current posts do.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.