Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 06-09-2016, 05:23 PM
 
Location: the very edge of the continent
89,059 posts, read 44,853,831 times
Reputation: 13718

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by lvmensch View Post
First statement in the report.
*************************
This article has been archived. It is still available for reference purposes, but may contain out of date information.
*************************
And it obviously is directed at the peer to peer sexual attack problem not predators looking to invade girls locker rooms. They would have vastly different characteristics.
Based on what?

If you disagree with the 99% of sex crime predators being male, provide different statistics with a citation.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 06-09-2016, 08:39 PM
 
Location: Lone Mountain Las Vegas NV
18,058 posts, read 10,357,659 times
Reputation: 8828
Quote:
Originally Posted by InformedConsent View Post
Based on what?

If you disagree with the 99% of sex crime predators being male, provide different statistics with a citation.
It is relatively simple to demonstrate that males do not commit 99%. There is however no point to doing so. Males are the vast majority of the perpetrators of sexual attacks.

But that is not the point. We are looking at the size and characteristics of those who would invade a women's locker room for erotic purposes. You have statistics on that subject? At that point I suspect the nature of the perpetrators is vastly different and women will play a bigger role.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-09-2016, 09:31 PM
 
2,464 posts, read 1,287,600 times
Reputation: 668
Quote:
Originally Posted by InformedConsent View Post
Of all sexual offenders against an individual, 99% are men, 1% are women.

I posted the link to the University of Michigan study.

So, again, I'll ask you...

A girl/woman complains about a suspicious male in the girls'/women's facilities, and he "says" he's "transgender" so he has every right to be there staring at her or making her uncomfortable with his advances. Now what?
I guess you will see an increase in women sexual offenders and a decrease in male sexual offenders.

Quote:
Originally Posted by RMESMH View Post
What specific criteria would you suggest would constitute a violation and who is to be believed initially in order to take any action. Lvmensch has already admitted that enforcement re the the peeping part of this issue might be problematic.
You will have to ask InformedConcent that question, she seems to be the expert on that topic.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-10-2016, 03:50 AM
 
Location: the very edge of the continent
89,059 posts, read 44,853,831 times
Reputation: 13718
Quote:
Originally Posted by lvmensch View Post
It is relatively simple to demonstrate that males do not commit 99%.
Then do so.

I posted a source stating males are 99% of sexual predators.

Post a source that disputes that.

And the idiot Transgender Cause SJWs want to give males FREE REIN to enter girls'/women's multiple occupancy restrooms/changing/locker/shower rooms merely by "claiming" to be "transgender," no proof whatsoever required. It's all just based on their "say so."
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-10-2016, 04:11 AM
 
Location: Columbia, SC
37,229 posts, read 19,219,451 times
Reputation: 14916
Quote:
Originally Posted by Stymie13 View Post
Before people weigh in, I hope they read the link.
Thanks for sharing.
Read the link, and also did a bit of research on lifesitenews. It's a blog by a RW "christian" political group in Canada, and carries about as much weight as the Sunday funnies as a news site. Scratch that - you can actually get some pretty good stuff from the funnies.

Recommendation: They should change their name to life****enews.com

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Campaign_Life_Coalition
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-10-2016, 06:46 AM
 
2,464 posts, read 1,287,600 times
Reputation: 668
Quote:
Originally Posted by InformedConsent View Post
Then do so.

I posted a source stating males are 99% of sexual predators.

Post a source that disputes that.

And the idiot Transgender Cause SJWs want to give males FREE REIN to enter girls'/women's multiple occupancy restrooms/changing/locker/shower rooms merely by "claiming" to be "transgender," no proof whatsoever required. It's all just based on their "say so."
Brock Turner is the guy you don't want in the bathroom with your daughter, a transgender person minding their own business is not the issue.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-10-2016, 06:49 AM
 
Location: the very edge of the continent
89,059 posts, read 44,853,831 times
Reputation: 13718
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cliftonpdx View Post
Brock Turner is the guy you don't want in the bathroom with your daughter, a transgender person minding their own business is not the issue.
Again... I posted a source stating males are 99% of sexual predators.

Post a source that disputes that.

And the idiot Transgender Cause SJWs want to give males FREE REIN to enter girls'/women's multiple occupancy restrooms/changing/locker/shower rooms merely by "claiming" to be "transgender," no proof whatsoever required. It's all just based on their "say so."
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-10-2016, 06:53 AM
 
2,464 posts, read 1,287,600 times
Reputation: 668
Quote:
Originally Posted by InformedConsent View Post
Again... I posted a source stating males are 99% of sexual predators.

Post a source that disputes that.

And the idiot Transgender Cause SJWs want to give males FREE REIN to enter girls'/women's multiple occupancy restrooms/changing/locker/shower rooms merely by "claiming" to be "transgender," no proof whatsoever required. It's all just based on their "say so."
I don't dispute that claim, I think it is a very accurate claim. What I dispute is the claim you have that they are gonna all start pretending to be women so they can sexually assault them freely. That is incorrect because it is also illegal for women to sexually assault others.

I am not saying lots of women are sexually assaulting other women, I am just saying that too is illegal. Try and dispute that.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-10-2016, 09:30 AM
 
Location: Lone Mountain Las Vegas NV
18,058 posts, read 10,357,659 times
Reputation: 8828
Quote:
Originally Posted by InformedConsent View Post
Again... I posted a source stating males are 99% of sexual predators.

Post a source that disputes that.

And the idiot Transgender Cause SJWs want to give males FREE REIN to enter girls'/women's multiple occupancy restrooms/changing/locker/shower rooms merely by "claiming" to be "transgender," no proof whatsoever required. It's all just based on their "say so."
You posted a source that says it may be out of date and is for archival purposes. Find a real one. And find one that deals with the class that approaches strangers in a locker room.

To dispute the 99% is simple.

Most, not all sexual offenders are men

The article observes that womern sexual predators are under reported.

And we are still not to the class that would use women locker room as a tactic.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-11-2016, 02:15 AM
 
Location: the very edge of the continent
89,059 posts, read 44,853,831 times
Reputation: 13718
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cliftonpdx View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by InformedConsent View Post
Again... I posted a source stating males are 99% of sexual predators.

Post a source that disputes that.

And the idiot Transgender Cause SJWs want to give males FREE REIN to enter girls'/women's multiple occupancy restrooms/changing/locker/shower rooms merely by "claiming" to be "transgender," no proof whatsoever required. It's all just based on their "say so."
I don't dispute that claim, I think it is a very accurate claim. What I dispute is the claim you have that they are gonna all start pretending to be women so they can sexually assault them freely. That is incorrect because it is also illegal for women to sexually assault others.
Who said all?

But the better question is how many would it take? How many MORE girl/women victims of male sexual predators are enough for you Transgender Cause SJWs to UNDERSTAND you've made the world MORE DANGEROUS for girls and women?

1? 10? 100? 1,000? 10,000?...

How many?

Answer the question... How many girls'/women's safety do you think is expendable?

1? 10? 100? 1,000? 10,000?...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:21 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top