Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 11-11-2016, 04:08 AM
 
Location: Wartrace,TN
8,069 posts, read 12,787,809 times
Reputation: 16525

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by PullMyFinger View Post
Would be the best thing this country ever did. Just look at these maladjusted, overweight and immature young people protesting about something most have no clue of. One girl (she was probably 5'2/200 lbs) suggested there would be bloodshed to get what they want. First off, who is going to shed their blood? I doubt she could climb a set of stairs without resting. These young people are lost. Their parents taught them nothing.

They do 2 years of military service and get 2 years of college in return.
Last thing we need. Roughly four million people turn 18 every year. If you required two years of service that would mean eight million more enlisted +/- in our military. Our current military has a total of 1,430,000 active duty members and it costs over 600,000,000,000.00 dollars to operate. Adding 8,000,000, to the ranks would use the entire federal budget and more.

Our military is doing fine without these worthless whiners. It is not the job of our military do the job of failed parents.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 11-11-2016, 04:27 AM
 
Location: Phoenix, AZ
7,184 posts, read 4,769,336 times
Reputation: 4869
Quote:
Originally Posted by PullMyFinger View Post
Would be the best thing this country ever did. Just look at these maladjusted, overweight and immature young people protesting about something most have no clue of. One girl (she was probably 5'2/200 lbs) suggested there would be bloodshed to get what they want. First off, who is going to shed their blood? I doubt she could climb a set of stairs without resting. These young people are lost. Their parents taught them nothing.

They do 2 years of military service and get 2 years of college in return.
Well, that girl could sit on your rib cage and prevent you from breathing long enough to kill you.

These kids need more than two years for the experience to do any good: they need 6 yrs.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-11-2016, 04:47 AM
 
137 posts, read 197,117 times
Reputation: 216
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wartrace View Post
Last thing we need. Roughly four million people turn 18 every year. If you required two years of service that would mean eight million more enlisted +/- in our military. Our current military has a total of 1,430,000 active duty members and it costs over 600,000,000,000.00 dollars to operate. Adding 8,000,000, to the ranks would use the entire federal budget and more.

Our military is doing fine without these worthless whiners. It is not the job of our military do the job of failed parents.
That's the real set of problems. The economics of such a thing are absolutely ludicrous. We'd have to increase the regular military size as well to have experienced command and support troops to look after all the kids.

I've seen enlistment turn some problem kids around, but it usually doesn't just fix people systematically.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-11-2016, 04:54 AM
 
Location: The Island of Misfit Toys
2,765 posts, read 2,793,856 times
Reputation: 2366
Counter proposal:

Two years mandatory feminist, African American, Latino American, LBGQ, Muslim American and people with disabilities sensitivity training.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-11-2016, 05:05 AM
 
Location: middle of everywhere
1,863 posts, read 4,300,247 times
Reputation: 1915
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shankapotomus View Post
Counter proposal:

Two years mandatory feminist, African American, Latino American, LBGQ, Muslim American and people with disabilities sensitivity training.
Bravo! Now that would fix quite a bit of society's ills and have a more well adjusted society. Talk about fixing the failure of American parents.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-11-2016, 05:12 AM
 
Location: DC
6,848 posts, read 7,996,763 times
Reputation: 3572
Quote:
Originally Posted by PullMyFinger View Post
Would be the best thing this country ever did. Just look at these maladjusted, overweight and immature young people protesting about something most have no clue of. One girl (she was probably 5'2/200 lbs) suggested there would be bloodshed to get what they want. First off, who is going to shed their blood? I doubt she could climb a set of stairs without resting. These young people are lost. Their parents taught them nothing.

They do 2 years of military service and get 2 years of college in return.
The military is not a substitute for parenting. Raise your child right and stop looking to the government to fix things you screw up.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-11-2016, 05:28 AM
 
45,232 posts, read 26,457,645 times
Reputation: 24994
Horrible idea, and it's pathetic people who support such an idea must also believe the govt owns our bodies.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-11-2016, 05:28 AM
 
Location: Wartrace,TN
8,069 posts, read 12,787,809 times
Reputation: 16525
Quote:
Originally Posted by poppunk View Post
That's the real set of problems. The economics of such a thing are absolutely ludicrous. We'd have to increase the regular military size as well to have experienced command and support troops to look after all the kids.

I've seen enlistment turn some problem kids around, but it usually doesn't just fix people systematically.
Another problem is with the largest military in the world would our leaders be tempted to use it?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-11-2016, 05:29 AM
 
45,232 posts, read 26,457,645 times
Reputation: 24994
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shankapotomus View Post
Counter proposal:

Two years mandatory feminist, African American, Latino American, LBGQ, Muslim American and people with disabilities sensitivity training.
Yes instead of SEALS the can be SJW's!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-11-2016, 05:32 AM
 
28,677 posts, read 18,801,179 times
Reputation: 30998
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wartrace View Post
Last thing we need. Roughly four million people turn 18 every year. If you required two years of service that would mean eight million more enlisted +/- in our military. Our current military has a total of 1,430,000 active duty members and it costs over 600,000,000,000.00 dollars to operate. Adding 8,000,000, to the ranks would use the entire federal budget and more.

Our military is doing fine without these worthless whiners. It is not the job of our military do the job of failed parents.
Quote:
Originally Posted by poppunk View Post
That's the real set of problems. The economics of such a thing are absolutely ludicrous. We'd have to increase the regular military size as well to have experienced command and support troops to look after all the kids.

I've seen enlistment turn some problem kids around, but it usually doesn't just fix people systematically.
Let's say only a quarter of that 4,000,000 is capable of being trained for any military specialty (actual DoD statistics point to only 25-28% proving trainable for any military specialty).

So 1,000,000 per year at best can even make the cut into basic training. If we keep them for two years, that's 2,000,000 greenies. The current accession capacity of the DoD is about 120,000 recruits annually--that's training cadre, training equipment, bunkspace, mess hall tables, classrooms, acreage to train in, hospital beds, doctors, gas, tires, and oil. Those are all costs on top of military mission operational requirements. So let's increase all of that by 2000x.

Wait, there's more. Even the potentially good troops are not that good right out of training. You've also changed the proportion of ready-for-combat versus not-ready-for-combat even when they're out of training. Currently the military tries to control that proportion overseas so that units likely to face combat are not burdened with too large a proportion of green troops. That control goes out the window.

And none of that has anything to do with increasing the ability to do the military mission. Today's military doesn't need "cannon fodder."

As has been stated, it's not the military's job to fix society.

OTOH, I wouldn't mind seeing a provision requiring all persons seeking elected or appointed federal office to have served at least two years in some kind of onerous service duty.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:41 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top