Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 12-10-2016, 09:57 PM
 
22,473 posts, read 12,007,727 times
Reputation: 20398

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by AFP View Post
You are making the claim so therefore back it up with evidence.
See post #228.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 12-10-2016, 09:58 PM
 
26,504 posts, read 15,084,039 times
Reputation: 14662
You already have Democrats on TV asking for a re-vote.


Is it considered a foreign interference on our election if:

-Non-US Citizens voted.

-You accept millions in your foundation from foreign countries and that foundation whisks you around, puts you face to face with mega donors, schedules events to coincide with campaign rallies, etc...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-10-2016, 10:06 PM
 
32,071 posts, read 15,072,790 times
Reputation: 13691
Quote:
Originally Posted by WaldoKitty View Post
I am.

Provide a link to an official press release from the CIA where they state the Russians influenced the 2016 election and cost Hillary Clinton the Presidency.
If Trump and his minions don't believe our intelligence then our country is screwed. We could have many more terrorists attacks because Trump is in denial and does nothing about it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-10-2016, 10:08 PM
 
Location: Long Island
57,315 posts, read 26,228,587 times
Reputation: 15648
Quote:
Originally Posted by michiganmoon View Post
You already have Democrats on TV asking for a re-vote.


Is it considered a foreign interference on our election if:

-Non-US Citizens voted.

-You accept millions in your foundation from foreign countries and that foundation whisks you around, puts you face to face with mega donors, schedules events to coincide with campaign rallies, etc...

Well that is your definition.

Problem is it's not even arguable that a foreign power hacked into the DNC, so according to your definition that doesn't constitute foreign interference. I assume the bipartisan investigation that concludes in January will be dismissed since hacking doesn't fit the definition.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-10-2016, 10:33 PM
 
Location: Seattle
1,384 posts, read 2,693,644 times
Reputation: 1378
Unfortunately there are so many stupid people in this country who will fall for the game.
It is so clear that they are trying to do anything to discredit the legitimacy of Trump's presidency. After failing the recounts, they're now pulling out as many fantasies as they can to explain the loss.

They know the result won't be overturned, but their goal now is to try to create as much chaos and distraction as they can to prevent Trump from leading effectively. This is all just part of their machinations to keep the country divided.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-10-2016, 10:44 PM
 
32,071 posts, read 15,072,790 times
Reputation: 13691
Quote:
Originally Posted by Boosane View Post
Unfortunately there are so many stupid people in this country who will fall for the game.
It is so clear that they are trying to do anything to discredit the legitimacy of Trump's presidency. After failing the recounts, they're now pulling out as many fantasies as they can to explain the loss.

They know the result won't be overturned, but their goal now is to try to create as much chaos and distraction as they can to prevent Trump from leading effectively. This is all just part of their machinations to keep the country divided.
So you are saying that you don't believe our intelligence and calling people stupid because they do? Do you think Trump knows more about our intelligence. He doesn't even listen to the briefings he should get daily. He couldn't be bothered by it
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-10-2016, 11:54 PM
 
Location: Buckeye, AZ
38,936 posts, read 23,908,308 times
Reputation: 14125
Quote:
Originally Posted by natalie469 View Post
So you are saying that you don't believe our intelligence and calling people stupid because they do? Do you think Trump knows more about our intelligence. He doesn't even listen to the briefings he should get daily. He couldn't be bothered by it
Trump is too Nixonian to be our president. We had that before and it ruined the oval office well into pre-Contra Reagan. Since then, the only president with no scandal was H.W. Bush and he still was "too liberal" and broke his no new taxes promise (to save the American people screwed over through the S&L crisis.)
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-11-2016, 01:55 AM
 
8,924 posts, read 5,630,750 times
Reputation: 12560
Trump publicly asked for the help of the Russians. The man is a mess. Big ego, can't be criticized, etc. I doubt he is going to do most of the crap he was campaigning on....
It may be a long 4 years....
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-11-2016, 02:26 AM
 
6,977 posts, read 5,711,006 times
Reputation: 5177
Quote:
Originally Posted by Goodnight View Post
This is rather interesting, the secret assessment isn't exactly secret anymore. We will see if other major outlets confirm this story.



https://www.washingtonpost.com/world...=.eec99278b266
Wash Post = Fake news.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-11-2016, 03:01 AM
 
Location: Seattle
1,384 posts, read 2,693,644 times
Reputation: 1378
Quote:
Originally Posted by natalie469 View Post
So you are saying that you don't believe our intelligence and calling people stupid because they do? Do you think Trump knows more about our intelligence. He doesn't even listen to the briefings he should get daily. He couldn't be bothered by it
Quote:
"However, some questions remain unanswered and the CIA’s assessment fell short of a formal US assessment produced by all 17 intelligence agencies, the report said. For example, intelligence agents do not have proof that Russian officials directed the identified individuals to supply WikiLeaks with the hacked Democratic emails."
Maybe you should use some critical thinking before "believing in our intelligence".
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:27 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top