Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
25 years and she is talking to press? - maybe she did shotty work??? In 25 years- what refugee has caused a terrorist act? one thing I do know- most of these people are tightly knit together-- just as the Cuban refuges- very few who did NOT know each other or who was who from where, to whose parent or cousin- it is easy to track- even if there are no documents because of this-
maybe she was an employee 20 yrs ago> before PCs? terrible way to attack your co workers- maybe disgruntled - I can see that
really? really? I suggest you look that one up cause embassies are great but not at all required, kind of funny how little so many really know about the greater world and how we operate in it.
I have utilized US services in countries where we have no embassies and it is common enough. furthermore often the nearest is hundreds of miles away and guess what it is no biggie.
And I suppose all of these countries have state of the art record keeping systems too right?
Or how about at least social security numbers?
Verifiable school and employment records?
Fingerprinted birth and death certificates?
Drivers license agencies that require at least two forms of verifiable ID?
Any flipping reliable way to tell one Muhammad from the next?
No?
How do you vet someone from a third world sand pit?
The damn Director of the FBI and CIA said this months and months ago. Lefties are deaf dumb and blind.
I know, I know. The way we vet refugees should be the same for everyone. Asking them, "Are you a terrorist?" is stupid but it's just as stupid to let people in who need work when we have our own people on welfare and unemployment so even if they aren't a terrorist why do we want them? Just so businesses can have cheap labor and the Catholic Church, for example, can fill their pews are not good enough reasons.
I say shut the whole thing down for 6 months to a year.
hmm, on the Nordstrom thread you are repeatedly demanding proof.... where is yours? links to both or we have to say you are not meeting the standards you are requiring of others...
come on now. Proof both did what you said or we must conclude your statement in not correct.
Try paying attention and actually getting your news from somewhere besides the DNC talking points in your inbox.
people, those are 3rd world countries, people (not all) but a lot of people live in the dessert, in mountains, etc...they don't even know how old they are, they have no calendars, women don't go to hospitals to have babies, they don't have showers, toilets....how in the world can you vet someone like that?
I don't believe people in the U.S. understand how primitive they are.
I will say this, the nice ones are child like, but the mean ones are meaner then you can imagine, and you don't know who is who. they pretend to be nice, they lie, to get into the U.S. I mean, why do you think so many women want to get away from it all and come to the U.S. and btw, there are many muslim women who lived this kind of life and are all for the ban.
“As a recently retired 25-year veteran of the U.S. Department of State who served almost eight years as a refugee coordinator throughout the Middle East, Africa, Russia and Cuba, I have seen first-hand the abuses and fraud that permeate the refugee program and know about the entrenched interests that fight every effort to implement much-needed reform. Despite claims of enhanced vetting, the reality is that it is virtually impossible to vet an individual who has no type of an official record, particularly in countries compromised by terrorism. U.S. immigration officials simply rely on the person’s often rehearsed and fabricated ‘testimony.’ I have personally seen this on hundreds of occasions.”
That's her statement not my quotes for copying it.
And it's not just in the terrorist countries, either. She gives an example of Malta and just as we have a problem with Mexicans and Central Americans coming here for work not because of political asylum, she says this, too: "Similarly, the “special” in-country refugee programs in Cuba and Russia continue, although they are laden with fraud and far too often simply admit economic migrants rather than actual refugees."
Frankly, I think we should cut everyone off and investigate the ones already here.
"the reality is that it is virtually impossible to vet an individual who has no type of an official record, particularly in countries compromised by terrorism."
I think ht FBI said the same thing BEFORE the election and the left ignore it.
hmm, on the Nordstrom thread you are repeatedly demanding proof.... where is yours? links to both or we have to say you are not meeting the standards you are requiring of others...
come on now. Proof both did what you said or we must conclude your statement in not correct.
Maybe YOU should keep with the news instead of asking others to show you what is common knowledge.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
maybe she did shotty work???
In 25 years- what refugee has caused a terrorist act? one thing I do know- most of these people are tightly knit together-- just as the Cuban refuges- very few who did NOT know each other or who was who from where, to whose parent or cousin- it is easy to track- even if there are no documents because of this- 
